The Current Cinema

“Tony,” “Late Fame,” and the Rocky Road to Literary Stardom

《托尼》、《迟来的盛名》与文学星途的崎岖之路
The protagonists of two films, an Anthony Bourdain bio-pic and a drama about a neglected poet, find themselves struggling with their writerly destinies.
两部电影的主人公——一部安东尼·波登的传记片和一部关于被忽视的诗人的剧情片——都在各自的写作宿命中挣扎。
A man in chefs whites in a kitchen.
Photograph by Seacia Pavao / Courtesy A24

I mean it as a strange sort of compliment when I say that, for decent stretches of the new biographical drama “Tony,” I came close to forgetting who Tony was—or, more precisely, I forgot about the brash, beloved, outsized, outspoken personality he would become. When we first meet him onscreen, in the spring of 1975, Tony (Dominic Sessa) is a Vassar student, with an unruly mop of hair, a mouth full of pompous put-downs, and a blustery ambition to become a writer. When someone addresses him as Anthony, he waves the name aside, claiming that only his mother calls him that. Through a convoluted chain of events, Tony winds up in Provincetown, Massachusetts, where he spends his summer working at a sloppy seafood joint called the Flagship. The chef (a wonderful Antonio Banderas) rechristens him Flaco, a term of endearment, mostly, that lodges in your brain. Not until the closing scenes do we hear Tony’s full name, Anthony Bourdain, spoken aloud, and for many in the audience the moment will land with a satisfying click—the sound of destiny snapping into place. Others, like me, might find themselves jolted back to bio-pic reality: Oh, yeah! That guy.

说这话是一种奇怪的赞美:在看新传记剧情片《托尼》的很长一段时间里,我几乎忘了托尼是谁——或者更准确地说,我忘了他后来会成为的那个粗鲁、受人爱戴、不同凡响、直言不讳的人物。1975年春天,我们第一次在银幕上见到他时,托尼(多米尼克·塞萨饰)是瓦萨学院的学生,顶着一头乱蓬蓬的头发,满口浮夸的贬损之词,怀着成为作家的狂妄野心。有人叫他安东尼,他挥手不理,声称只有他母亲才那么叫他。经过一连串曲折的事件,托尼来到了马萨诸塞州的普罗温斯敦,整个夏天都在一家名叫“旗舰”的邋遢海鲜馆打工。主厨(由出色的安东尼奥·班德拉斯饰演)给他起了个新名字叫“弗拉科”,这大体上是个昵称,却深深印在你的脑海里。直到结尾几场戏,我们才听到托尼的全名——安东尼·波登——被大声说出来,对许多观众而言,这一刻会带来一种满足的“咔嗒”感——那是命运归位的声音。而像我这样的其他人,可能会被猛地拽回传记片的现实:哦,对!是那家伙。

How could we forget? Bourdain, the celebrity chef who parlayed the success of his best-selling memoir, “Kitchen Confidential” (2000), into an astounding career as a globe-trotting TV host, was often lovingly described as “larger than life.” In the years since his suicide, in 2018, the public’s undimmed affection suggests that he may also be larger than death. He was previously memorialized onscreen in an anguished documentary, “Roadrunner” (2021), that tried to make sense of the exuberant highs and despairing lows of his final years. “Tony,” which was directed and co-written by the Canadian filmmaker Matt Johnson, attempts more or less the opposite. Loosely drawn from the Provincetown chapters of “Kitchen Confidential,” the film is a narrow, crowd-pleasing slice of a wildly tumultuous life—a portrait of the culinary artist as an endearing, exasperating young fuckup, set during a summer of squid stews and Wellfleet oysters that changes his life.

我们怎么可能忘记?波登这位明星主厨,凭借畅销回忆录《厨房机密档案》(2000年)的成功,将其转化为环球旅行电视主持人的惊人事业,常被爱称为“比生命更传奇”。自他2018年自杀以来,公众未曾消减的喜爱表明,他或许也比死亡更强大。此前,一部痛苦的纪录片《流浪者》(2021年)曾在银幕上纪念他,试图理解他生命最后几年里狂喜的高潮与绝望的低谷。《托尼》由加拿大电影人马特·约翰逊执导并联合编剧,它尝试的几乎恰恰相反。影片松散地取材于《厨房机密档案》中普罗温斯敦的章节,截取了一段狂野动荡人生中狭窄却取悦观众的片段——一幅烹饪艺术家年轻时可爱又可气的混蛋肖像,背景是一个改变了他一生的夏天,充满了炖鱿鱼和韦尔弗利特牡蛎。

“Jaws” is in theatres, and love is in the air. Tony comes to Provincetown in pursuit of his crush, Nancy (Emilia Jones), to whom he lies continually and unconvincingly about his reasons for being there. The Flagship kitchen is basically a fruits de mer frat house, where the kitchen workers, none rougher or funnier than Sal (Leo Woodall), are a bunch of misfits, snorting cocaine off one hand and slamming down plates of French fries with the other. The exception is Banderas’s unnamed chef, a pillar of Jesus-loving rectitude who gives Tony a job, lets him sleep on his porch, and awakens him each morning with a splash of sea water—a bracing dose of tough love. If it’s fairly easy to dissociate “Tony” from its real-life subject, it’s because the script filters Tony’s experience through a not unpleasant haze of coming-of-age clichés: it’s a youthful romance, a goofball gross-out, and a “Karate Kid” fable rolled into one. You might get so caught up in the comedy, familiar beats and all, that you forget you’re watching a bio-pic.

《大白鲨》正在影院上映,空气中弥漫着爱情的气息。托尼来到普罗温斯敦,是为了追求他迷恋的南希(艾米莉亚·琼斯饰),他不断向她撒谎,说自己来此地的理由,但毫无说服力。“旗舰”餐厅的后厨基本上就是个海鲜兄弟会,厨房员工是一群格格不入的人,其中要数萨尔(利奥·伍德尔饰)最粗鲁也最有趣,他们一手吸着可卡因,一手摔下一盘盘炸薯条。唯一的例外是班德拉斯饰演的无名主厨,他是热爱耶稣、品行端正的支柱,给了托尼一份工作,让他睡在自己的门廊上,每天早晨用海水把他泼醒——这是一剂令人警醒的严厉之爱。如果说把《托尼》与其现实生活中的原型区分开来相当容易,那是因为剧本将托尼的经历,过滤进了一层并不令人反感的成长故事陈词滥调之中:它既是青春罗曼史,又是傻瓜式的粗俗喜剧,还是一则《龙威小子》式的寓言。你可能会完全沉浸在这部喜剧里,包括那些熟悉的节拍,以至于忘了自己正在看一部传记片。

This is all to the good. As Johnson demonstrated in “BlackBerry” (2023), his engrossing drama about the success and failure of the once popular smartphone, he has a knack for spinning real-life events into counterintuitive entertainment. Far too many bio-pics are mere exercises in slobbering idol worship, and most of them are made and marketed on the strength of a physical resemblance between star and subject. Refreshingly, the degree to which Dominic Sessa looks like the young Bourdain—and, specifically, Bourdain before his face was famous—feels piddlingly insignificant here. Watching Sessa, a lean, gangly twentysomething with a viciously compelling scowl, I was reminded less of Bourdain than of Sessa’s own breakthrough role in “The Holdovers” (2023), in which he played another smart, angry, insecure teen-age malcontent who gets stranded during a seasonal holiday and finds an improbable mentor.

这完全是件好事。正如约翰逊在他引人入胜的剧情片《黑莓》(2023年)中所展示的那样——该片讲述了这款曾风靡一时的智能手机的成功与失败——他有一种天赋,能把真实事件转化为反直觉的娱乐。太多的传记片仅仅是流着口水搞偶像崇拜的练习,而且其中大多数都是靠明星与原型人物的外貌相似度来制作和营销的。令人耳目一新的是,多米尼克·塞萨长得有多像年轻的波登——具体来说,是在他那张脸出名之前的波登——在这里显得微不足道。看着塞萨,一个瘦削、身材瘦长、带着一种极具冲击力的怒容的二十多岁年轻人,我想到的与其说是波登,不如说是塞萨自己在《留校联盟》(2023年)中的突破性角色,在那部片子里,他扮演了另一个聪明、愤怒、缺乏安全感的青少年不满者,在假期被困时,找到了一位意想不到的导师。

Tony, though, has his own unique set of issues. He’s a sloppy drunk, an angry blowhard, and a bit of a klutz, which isn’t ideal in a job where cuts and burns are everyday hazards. But, beneath his comic belligerence, he has a vulnerability that keeps his swagger in check. There’s an early scene in the film, before Tony decamps for Provincetown, in which he lies to his parents about having won a summer writing fellowship. Tony’s braggadocio is only skin deep; watch the shame that clouds his face when his mother, Gladys Bourdain (a coolly incisive Dagmara Dominczyk), corrects his pronunciation of the word “bildungsroman.” (Gladys, a Times copy editor, knew her business; she also proved instrumental in getting “Don’t Eat Before Reading This,” her son’s juicy first essay about the restaurant industry, published in The New Yorker, in 1999.)

不过,托尼有他自己独特的问题。他是个邋遢的酒鬼,一个愤怒的吹牛大王,还有点笨手笨脚,这在一份割伤和烫伤是日常危险的工作中可不太理想。但是,在他滑稽的好斗外表之下,有一种脆弱感抑制着他的虚张声势。影片早期有一场戏,在托尼动身去普罗温斯敦之前,他向父母撒谎,说自己赢得了一个暑期写作奖学金。托尼的吹嘘只是表面功夫;看看当他母亲格拉迪斯·波登(由冷静犀利的达格玛拉·多敏齐克饰演)纠正他“成长小说”这个词的发音时,他脸上布满的羞愧吧。(格拉迪斯是《纽约时报》的文字编辑,精通本行;事实证明,在将她儿子那篇关于餐饮业的生动有趣的第一篇文章《读此文前勿进食》于1999年发表在《纽约客》上这件事上,她也起到了关键作用。)

This Tony, the future bad-boy tell-all insider of the culinary world, is still touchingly unformed—a mortar full of raw, pasty potential, crying out for life experience to pestle him into shape. But what, exactly, will he be ground into—a chef or a scribe? “I’m a writer,” Tony keeps telling people; it’s the identity he’s long clung to, and the only one that gives his shambles of a life meaning. We never see him do any actual writing in the film, and that’s more than O.K.; the last thing we need is another hackneyed spectacle of a young literary genius hunched over his typewriter. What we do see Tony do is cook—shucking oysters, shredding potatoes, and, on a fateful Friday night, plating a lobster thermidor for the girl of his dreams. The kitchen montages are formulaic yet revelatory; Tony loves food, it turns out, as much as he loves words, and Johnson’s film commits to the belief that a writer is ultimately nothing without a subject. Amid the squalor and chaos of a Provincetown kitchen, Anthony Bourdain found his—and Tony did, too.

这个托尼,也就是未来烹饪界那个爆料的坏小子内行人,仍然稚嫩得令人动容——他像一臼子生涩、糊状的潜能,迫切需要生活经历来把他捣杵成型。但他究竟会被研磨成什么——厨师还是写作者?“我是个作家,”托尼不停地对人说;这是他长久以来坚守的身份,也是唯一能让他那一团糟的生活具有意义的东西。我们在影片中从未看到他真正写作,这完全没问题;我们最不需要的就是又一个年轻文学天才伏案打字的陈腐场面。我们确实看到托尼做的是烹饪——剥牡蛎、切土豆丝,以及在一个决定性的周五晚上,为他梦寐以求的女孩做一盘龙虾 thermidor。厨房的蒙太奇段落虽显套路,却富有揭示性;原来,托尼对食物的热爱,不亚于他对文字的热爱,而约翰逊的电影坚信这样一个信念:一个作家,如果没有写作对象,终究什么都不是。在普罗温斯敦一间厨房的污秽与混乱中,安东尼·波登找到了他的写作对象——托尼也找到了。
Willem Dafoe sitting on a table in blue room.
Willem Dafoe, in “Late Fame.”
威廉·达福,出演《迟来的名声》。
Photograph by Atsushi Nishijima / Magnolia Pictures / Everett

Bourdain was in his forties when “Kitchen Confidential” was published, and “Tony” ends with that career-igniting milestone still decades away. “Late Fame,” an exquisitely wry and melancholic new drama from the director Kent Jones, approaches the puzzle of a writer’s life and art from the opposite direction. Ed Saxberger (Willem Dafoe), a rumpled-looking Manhattanite in his late sixties or early seventies, was a young man when he wrote a slender volume of poetry titled “Way Past Go”; it was published, in 1979, to some acclaim, including a rave in the Village Voice. Nearly fifty years later, Saxberger’s early burst of literary promise is long forgotten, as are the poems themselves. He works at a post office, a job he’s held for thirty-seven years. Age and alcohol have taken a toll; he’s several years sober but still hangs out at a bar with his buddies, none of whom know about his literary past.

《厨房机密档案》出版时,波登已经四十多岁了,而《托尼》的结尾,距离那个点燃事业的里程碑还有几十年。导演肯特·琼斯执导的新片《迟来的盛名》,一部精妙绝伦、讽刺而忧伤的剧情片,则从相反的方向探讨了作家的生活与艺术这个谜题。埃德·萨克斯伯格(威廉·达福饰)是个衣着邋遢的曼哈顿人,年近古稀或刚过七十。他年轻时写过一本薄薄的诗集,名叫《遥遥领先》;诗集于1979年出版,获得了一些好评,包括《村声》杂志的一篇热情评论。将近五十年后,萨克斯伯格早年闪现的文学才华早已被遗忘,那些诗作本身也一样。他在邮局工作,一干就是三十七年。岁月和酒精留下了痕迹;他戒酒好几年了,但仍和一群朋友泡在酒吧里,而这些朋友没人知道他往日的文学经历。

One chilly day, that past comes rushing back. Saxberger is greeted outside his apartment building by Wilson Meyers (Edmund Donovan), an impassioned young admirer who considers “Way Past Go” a masterpiece: “It’s as if the poems were written yesterday,” he declares. Dafoe, a master of expressive restraint, turns even this first encounter into a small triumph of barely suppressed feeling. A crinkly smile steals across Saxberger’s careworn face, but it’s chased away by genuine shock (“Is this some kind of joke?” he wonders aloud) and more than a hint of skepticism. He’s right to be suspicious. Meyers, an almost parodic vision of an old soul, gushes praise in unfashionably complete sentences. He begs Saxberger to meet with him and his friends—a motley group of writers, artists, critics, and intellectuals, all apparently just as besotted with “Way Past Go” as he is. But Donovan shows us the calculation, verging on disingenuousness, beneath Meyers’s lofty, earnest veneer. Here is a man who believes fervently in his own flattery but also wields it like a weapon.

一个寒冷的日子,那段往事突然涌回。萨克斯伯格在公寓楼外,遇到了威尔逊·迈耶斯(埃德蒙·多诺万饰),一位充满激情的年轻崇拜者,他认为《遥遥领先》是一部杰作:“这些诗就好像是昨天写的一样,”他宣称。达福是表情克制的大师,他甚至将这次初次相遇,也变成了一场情感几不可察的小小胜利。一丝皱巴巴的微笑掠过萨克斯伯格饱经风霜的脸,但随即被真切的震惊(“这是什么玩笑吗?”他大声质疑)和不止一丝的怀疑所驱散。他怀疑得对。迈耶斯,一个近乎戏仿般的老灵魂,用不合时宜的完整句子滔滔不绝地赞美。他恳求萨克斯伯格见见他和他的朋友们——一群混杂的作家、艺术家、评论家和知识分子,显然都和他一样痴迷于《遥遥领先》。但多诺万向我们展示了迈耶斯那崇高、热忱外表下的算计,近乎虚伪。这是一个狂热相信自己那套奉承话,但也将其像武器一样挥舞的人。

After some initial reluctance, Saxberger finds himself in a Greenwich Village coffee shop where Meyers and his group regularly hang out. They call themselves the Enthusiasm Society, a name that captures their unironic spirit of cultural advocacy and their instinctive rejection of snark. They extend that enthusiasm to Saxberger immediately, welcoming him into the group and, before long, inviting him to serve as the marquee name for an upcoming event devoted to readings of their work. But, after the initial intoxication of niche celebrity, Saxberger finds himself disadvantaged and disoriented on multiple fronts. He is no longer the vigorous young poet who took inspiration from, and briefly rubbed elbows with, the New American Poetry pioneers of the nineteen-forties and fifties: Robert Creeley, Amiri Baraka, Ed Dorn. Decades out of practice, Saxberger is assailed by writer’s block and confused by the machinations of a modern-day publishing industry that wants to turn his rediscovery into a branding exercise. He also finds himself at odds with his bar buddies, who, in one lacerating scene, respond to Saxberger’s self-disclosure with mocking, philistine incuriosity.

起初有些不情愿,但萨克斯伯格最终还是来到了格林威治村的一家咖啡馆,迈耶斯和他的小团体常在那里聚会。他们自称“热忱社”,这个名字捕捉到了他们毫不反讽地倡导文化的精神,以及他们对刻薄嘲讽的本能拒绝。他们立刻将这份热忱延伸到了萨克斯伯格身上,欢迎他加入团体,并很快邀请他在一场即将举行的、专门朗读他们作品的活动上担任领衔人物。但是,在最初享受到小众名望的陶醉之后,萨克斯伯格发现自己在多个方面都处于劣势,迷失了方向。他不再是那个精力充沛的年轻诗人了,他曾从四五十年代美国新诗歌的先驱——罗伯特·克里利、阿米里·巴拉卡、埃德·多恩——那里汲取灵感,并曾与他们有过短暂的交往。几十年疏于练习,萨克斯伯格受到写作障碍的困扰,并被现代出版业的那套运作搞得困惑不已,这个行业想把他的重新发现变成一次品牌营销。他还发现自己与酒吧老友们格格不入,在一场极尽讽刺的戏里,他们对萨克斯伯格的自我坦白报以嘲弄和庸俗的漠不关心。

“Late Fame” has its roots in an 1895 novella, by the Viennese writer Arthur Schnitzler, that was, itself, the object of overdue discovery: unpublished during the author’s lifetime, it didn’t appear until 2014. (An English translation came out in 2017.) It was adapted for the screen by Samy Burch, who previously wrote “May December” (2023), Todd Haynes’s slippery comic melodrama about the cinematic exploitation of an old tabloid scandal. The circumstances of “Late Fame” may be less outwardly fraught, but here, as in the earlier film, Burch fleshes out the awkward dynamics of an ill-advised collaboration, in which superficial pleasantries hide the petty motives and desires of all involved. And, despite a shift from nineteenth-century Vienna to present-day New York, she has left the bones of the original story largely intact. This portrait of wannabe bohemians and intellectuals who adopt the fashions, mannerisms, and artistic practices of an earlier time has its own essential timelessness.

《迟来的盛名》源于维也纳作家阿图尔·施尼茨勒1895年的一部中篇小说,这部小说本身也是一个迟来的发现:在作者生前未曾出版,直到2014年才面世。(英译本于2017年出版。)剧本由萨米·伯奇改编,她之前曾为托德·海因斯那部关于将旧日小报丑闻进行电影化剥削的、狡猾的喜剧情节剧《五月十二月》(2023年)撰写剧本。《迟来的盛名》的情节或许表面上没那么充满纠葛,但在这里,和那部早期电影一样,伯奇充实了一场不明智的合作中那些尴尬的动态关系,其中,表面的客套掩盖了所有参与者狭隘的动机和欲望。而且,尽管背景从19世纪的维也纳移到了当今的纽约,她基本上保留了原故事的骨架。这幅描绘一群想成为波西米亚人和知识分子的人,他们模仿早期时代的时尚、举止和艺术实践,其本身就具有一种本质上的永恒性。

As in the novella, the society has a lone female member in its ranks, an actress and singer named Gloria (Greta Lee, of the romantic drama “Past Lives”). A woman of flamboyantly seductive gestures, Gloria dazzles Saxberger with her puckish wit, come-hither smile, and unfeigned, vibrant talent—at one point, she delivers a fiery rendition of the 1929 Brecht-Weill standard “Surabaya Johnny”—only to stand revealed, in the final stretch, as a tragically elusive object of desire. But hers is not the only mask to come off. Jones, who wrote and directed the realist drama “Diane” (2019), has made a satire with a surfeit of soul; he turns even the revelation of his characters’ foibles and pretensions into an act of tenderness. Meyers turns out to be a rich kid with a fancy apartment, someone who can afford to play the artistic revolutionary—which doesn’t negate, and may indeed validate, his love for art.

与中篇小说一样,这个社团中只有一位女性成员,一位名叫格洛丽亚(由爱情片《过往人生》中的格蕾塔·李饰演)的演员兼歌手。格洛丽亚举止浮华诱人,她用顽皮的机智、勾人的微笑和真实而充满活力的才华迷住了萨克斯伯格——有一刻,她激情澎湃地演唱了1929年布莱希特-魏尔的标准曲目《泗水约翰尼》——结果却在最后阶段显露出来,她不过是一个可悲地难以企及的欲望对象。但被揭下面具的,不止她一人。曾编剧并执导现实主义剧情片《黛安》(2019年)的琼斯,拍出了一部极富灵魂的讽刺剧;他甚至将揭示角色弱点和做作之处的过程,也变成了一种温柔之举。迈耶斯原来是个富家子弟,住着豪华公寓,玩得起艺术革命者的游戏——这并不能否定他对艺术的热爱,或许反而印证了这份爱。

The only figure who remains transparently, unchangeably himself is Saxberger, who, even as he enjoys his brush with literary celebrity, finds a deeper liberation in his limitations. He cannot churn out fresh verse on someone else’s deadline; nor can he pretend to be the critical authority, the endlessly encouraging mentor and sounding board, that his society friends so desperately need him to be. The poetry of this movie, in short, is in Dafoe, who gives his finest performance in years—a long trek from bliss to despair to disillusionment, and finally to the odd contentment and consolation that disillusionment often brings. ♦

唯一一个始终表里如一、不可改变的人物是萨克斯伯格,即使在他享受与文学名声的短暂邂逅时,也在自己的局限中找到了更深层的解脱。他无法在别人规定的截止日期前赶出新诗;也无法假装成他的社团朋友们迫切需要他成为的那种权威评论家、那个不断给予鼓励的导师和倾听者。简而言之,这部电影的诗意,全在于达福身上,他奉献了多年来最精彩的表演——这是一段从幸福到绝望,再到幻灭,并最终抵达幻灭常带来的那种奇特的满足与慰藉的漫长跋涉。 ♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month