Page-Turner

The Thrill of Picture Books That Let Kids in on the Joke

让孩子会心一笑的绘本魅力
Several recent books with unreliable narrators give children the rare pleasure of feeling smarter than the story.
近来几部以不可靠叙述者为主角的童书,让孩子们难得地享受到了比故事更聪明的快感。
April 20, 2026
A person peels away the top layer of a book cover.
Illustration by Antonio Giovanni Pinna

Spend time with a four-year-old and you will quickly learn that one way to guarantee shrieks of unstoppable laughter is to pretend not to see them sitting on the couch and then sit on top of them. It’s even better if you act confused by the lumpiness of the couch and repeatedly try to flatten the “cushion.” Another perennial crowd-pleaser is to sling the four-year-old over your shoulder as you pretend to look for them everywhere. Why do these shticks elicit such delight? Maybe because it’s uncommon in childhood to feel smarter than the biggest people in the room: to know something they don’t and to see them behave foolishly. If I were to create a comedy club for four-year-olds, the headlining act would involve a bumbling adult who misses something very obvious that all the four-year-olds in the audience already know.

和四岁孩子相处一阵,你就会发现,要让他们笑得停不下来,有个屡试不爽的法子:假装没看见他们坐在沙发上,然后一屁股坐上去。要是你还能摆出困惑的表情,抱怨沙发怎么凹凸不平,反复想把那个"垫子"压平,效果就更好了。另一个经久不衰的保留节目是把孩子扛在肩上,假装到处找他们。为什么这些老把戏总能带来如此纯粹的快乐?或许是因为在童年时期,能比房间里最高大的人更聪明——知道些他们不知道的事,看着他们犯傻——这样的机会实在难得。要是我来开个四岁儿童喜剧俱乐部,压轴节目准得安排个笨手笨脚的大人,对观众席上所有四岁小孩都心知肚明的事浑然不觉。

Several recent picture books play to this essential aspect of little-kid humor—the thrill of being in on the joke. Like the best Marx Brothers routines, these books set up a premise that unravels, with escalating absurdity, while kid listeners are given the satisfaction of knowing more than the story’s narrators.

最近出版的几本图画书,都抓住了幼儿幽默感的核心——那种"我懂这个笑话"的兴奋感。就像马克斯兄弟最精彩的喜剧桥段,这些书先抛出一个前提,然后层层解构,荒诞感不断升级,而小读者们则享受着比故事叙述者知道得更多的满足感。

“Don’t Trust Fish” (2025), written by Neil Sharpson and illustrated by Dan Santat, starts off with bland information about different types of animals:

《别信鱼》(2025),尼尔·夏普森著,丹·桑塔特绘,开篇平淡地介绍各类动物:

This animal has fur.

这动物身上长着毛。

This animal is warm-blooded.

这种动物是恒温动物。

This animal feeds her babies milk.

这种动物用乳汁哺育幼崽。

This animal is a MAMMAL.

这种动物属于哺乳类。

But after a few lines about reptiles and birds, things quickly go awry. When a page turn reveals an anodyne greenish fish, the narrator warns, “DON’T TRUST FISH,” and proceeds to list all the reasons not to, starting with the way fish don’t follow any template. Some have gills, some have lungs; some lay eggs, some don’t; some eat seaweed, some eat other fish. Repeating the mantra “Don’t trust fish,” the narrator becomes increasingly agitated about “their fishy secrets.” The child listener will soon grasp that this particular narrator is ridiculously wary of fish and brimming with wacky conspiracy theories about what they’re really up to:

但在讲了几行爬行动物和鸟类之后,事情很快变得不对劲。翻页出现一条平淡无奇的青绿色鱼时,叙述者警告道:"别相信鱼",接着列举了所有不该相信鱼的理由,首先就是鱼类不遵循任何模板。有些鱼有鳃,有些有肺;有些产卵,有些不产;有些吃海藻,有些吃其他鱼。叙述者不断重复"别相信鱼"这句咒语,对"它们那些鱼腥味的秘密"越来越激动。小读者很快就能领会到,这位叙述者对鱼类荒谬地警惕,满脑子关于鱼类真实意图的古怪阴谋论。

A group of fish is called a “school.”

一群鱼,我们称之为“鱼群”。

But what are they learning in these “schools”?

然而,这些"学校"里究竟在教些什么呢?

We have a right to know.

我们有权知道。

Santat’s illustrations begin with straightforward, muted sincerity and become brighter, busier, and more gleeful—filling every corner of the page—as Sharpson’s narrator becomes ever more unhinged, ranting about fish spies, fish disguises, and fish taking over the world. A kid listening to the story gains the supreme satisfaction of feeling far smarter, calmer, and more stable than the person in charge, while also solving its central mystery: Why is this narrator so afraid of fish? The twist of the ending provides a clue.

桑塔特的插画起初平实朴素、色调柔和,随着夏普森的叙述者愈发疯癫——喋喋不休地谈论鱼间谍、鱼伪装和鱼统治世界——画面逐渐变得明亮、繁复、欢快,直至填满书页的每个角落。听故事的孩子会获得极大的满足感:他们觉得自己比掌控故事的人更聪明、更冷静、更稳重,同时还能解开核心谜题:为什么叙述者如此害怕鱼?结局的转折给出了线索。

One reason this book delights is that literature for the youngest children is dominated by God-like narrators: utterly trustworthy, sternly dependable, consummate authorities on just about everything. Like parents and teachers, the narrators of picture books generally set the rules and guide the reader steadily in a predetermined direction. But a subversive tradition took hold in the early nineteen-seventies, coinciding with the heyday of Saturday-morning cartoons and children’s educational television. Some of the funniest picture books began to mine humor from a narrator who was either determined to mislead the reader or downright clueless. Jon Stone’s “The Monster at the End of This Book” (1971), illustrated by Michael Smollin, is a classic example, with Grover, the Sesame Street monster, employing extreme measures to prevent the reader from turning the pages—think knotted ropes, nailed boards, and brick walls—owing to his terror at the looming creature of the book’s title. (The monster waiting at the end of the book is, of course, Grover himself; when the second-to-last page is turned and Grover discovers that he is the monster, his relief is palpable—though we read in small print that he feels “so embarrassed.”) Other standouts in the unreliable-narrator tradition include Don and Audrey Wood’s “The Little Mouse, the Red Ripe Strawberry, and the Big Hungry Bear” (1984), in which the narrator tricks a mouse into sharing his strawberry by warning that a ravenous bear is coming to eat it, and Jon Scieszka’s “The True Story of the 3 Little Pigs” (1989), illustrated by Lane Smith, in which the much maligned wolf narrates the fable from his vantage, claiming he was only trying to borrow a cup of sugar from his neighbors (the pigs) when he felt a sneeze coming on.

这本书之所以令人愉悦,原因之一是幼儿文学向来由全知叙述者主宰:他们绝对可信、严格可靠,几乎在一切事物上都是完美权威。就像父母和老师一样,绘本的叙述者通常设定规则,并沿着预定方向稳步引导读者。但一种颠覆性的传统在二十世纪七十年代初开始盛行,恰逢周六晨间动画片与儿童教育电视节目的黄金时代。一些最有趣的绘本开始从叙述者身上挖掘幽默——这些叙述者要么执意误导读者,要么干脆对真相一无所知。乔恩·斯通(Jon Stone)创作、迈克尔·斯莫林(Michael Smollin)绘制插图的《这本书结尾的怪物》(1971)便是经典范例:芝麻街的怪物格罗弗(Grover)因惧怕书名中那个若隐若现的生物,不惜采取极端手段阻止读者翻页——打结的绳索、钉死的木板、砖砌的墙壁轮番上阵。(当然,等在书末的怪物正是格罗弗自己;当倒数第二页被翻开,格罗弗发现自己就是怪物时,他的释然溢于纸面——尽管小字标注着他感到"如此难为情"。)不可靠叙述者传统中的其他杰作还包括唐·伍德(Don Wood)与奥黛丽·伍德(Audrey Wood)的《小老鼠、红草莓与大饿熊》(1984),其中叙述者通过警告饥肠辘辘的熊要来吃掉草莓,诱使小老鼠分享它的果实;以及乔恩·谢斯卡(Jon Scieszka)创作、莱恩·史密斯(Lane Smith)绘制插图的《三只小猪的真实故事》(1989),被污名化的狼从自身视角重述了这个寓言,声称自己只是想在打喷嚏发作前向邻居(三只小猪)借杯糖而已。

These unreliable narrators are instantly appealing to kids because they extend a welcoming hand from the page, pulling young listeners inside the joke. Just as the narrator of “Don’t Trust Fish” wants to persuade readers to watch out for fish, the narrator of “The Bear Out There” (2025) written and illustrated by Jess Hannigan, has her own agenda, one that unfolds in bold, acrylic collage art. The story opens with a knock on the door that produces a terrified scream from a kid waiting inside. Sporting spiky orange hair and eyes that are reduced to featureless black orbs, she is visibly on edge, confiding:

这些不可靠的叙述者之所以能立刻吸引孩子,是因为他们从书页里伸出欢迎的手,将小读者拉进玩笑之中。正如《别相信鱼》的叙述者试图说服读者提防鱼类,杰丝·汉尼根(Jess Hannigan)创作并绘制插画的《外面的熊》(2025年)中的叙述者也有自己的盘算——这个意图随着粗犷的丙烯拼贴画面逐渐展开。故事始于一阵敲门声,屋里等待的孩子发出惊恐的尖叫。她顶着一头橙色尖刺短发,眼睛缩成没有特征的黑色圆点,显然处于紧张状态,她低声吐露道:

I know what the scary thing out there is.

我知道外面那可怕的东西是什么。

If you want to know, too, I can tell you, but

若你也想知道,我也可以告诉你,只是——

be prepared.

You may be chilled to the bone.

你或许会感到彻骨的寒意。

Are you ready?

Come closer.

You must promise not to scream.

你得保证,绝不尖叫。

The big reveal? There’s a bear out there. As the girl catalogues the signs that this frightening creature lurks just outside the house (e.g., “Your feet get suuuuper itchy”), readers quickly realize that this narrator is not someone to trust. . . . She is, in fact, hilariously untrustworthy, bragging about her woodland expertise while sketching a bear that resembles an eight-legged cat. But the story has several satisfying twists. First, there really is a bear out there, and kids will figure out where long before the girl does. Second, contrary to the girl’s dire warnings and her over-the-top reactions—she flees the premises, bellowing in horror—the bear means no harm. Third, as in “Goldilocks,” it is not the bear who is the intruder but the girl. We learn that this is the bear’s own house. The bear casually remarks, “break-ins happen all the time.” Donning an apron and a deadpan expression, the bear turns out to be an excellent host, offering the reader honey-lemon tea and sympathetic commentary about how frightening the woods can seem to “non-bear folk.” The end papers hold the final joke, which won’t be lost on attentive children: the splashy cover of the girl’s memoir, titled “I SURVIVED A REAL BEAR.”

最大的反转?外面真的有头熊。当女孩细数这头可怕生物潜伏在屋外的种种迹象(比如"你的脚会变得超级超级痒"),读者很快意识到这位叙述者并不可靠……事实上,她不可靠得令人捧腹,一边吹嘘自己的丛林生存技能,一边画出了像八脚猫的熊。但故事有几个令人满意的转折。首先,外面确实有头熊,孩子们会比女孩更早发现熊的踪迹。其次,与女孩危言耸听的警告和夸张反应——她惊恐地嚎叫着逃离现场——相反,这头熊并无恶意。第三,如同《金发姑娘》的故事,入侵者并非熊而是女孩。我们得知这原本就是熊的家。熊漫不经心地评论道:"非法闯入时有发生。"它系上围裙,面无表情,结果竟是位出色的主人,为读者奉上蜂蜜柠檬茶,并体贴地表示森林对"非熊族类"来说可能确实可怕。环衬页藏着最终的笑点,细心的孩子绝不会错过:那是女孩回忆录的炫目封面,标题写着《我亲历了真熊袭击》。

If you’ve ever been on the receiving end of a five-year-old’s withering “You are not the boss of me” (having caused offense by, say, helping to zip a jacket or tie a shoelace), you’ve seen how young children yearn for power. The draw of books with unreliable storytellers is that they give kids the chance to be in charge, deciding for themselves what the real story is. In a picture book from 2024, “Don’t Think of Tigers” by the South African author-illustrator Alex Latimer, the narrator breaks the fourth wall with an irresistible promise to the reader: “This book in your hands is MAGIC. Here’s how it works—whatever you picture in your mind I will draw on the next page.” The test case—picturing a cow doing ballet—produces a smug bovine pirouetting. But then the narrator cautions, “I really, really can’t draw tigers, so whatever you do, please DON’T THINK OF TIGERS!” Hence the joke of the book: kids listening to the story can’t stop imagining tigers, and, since their wish is the narrator’s command, each ensuing page is filled with a new, very silly iteration of a tiger: shaped like a cube, carrying a briefcase, flaunting a mermaid’s tail. The narrator, who has been getting a lot of practice drawing tigers, turns out to be quite good at it, and the low-key message that mistakes are the pathway to mastery won’t be lost on children, even while they relish bossing the narrator around.

如果你曾领教过五岁孩子那句杀伤力十足的"你管不着我"(也许只是因为你帮忙拉上外套拉链或系了鞋带就冒犯了他们),你就会明白年幼的孩子多么渴望掌控感。那些由不可靠叙述者讲述的绘本之所以吸引孩子,正是因为它们赋予孩子们当家作主的机会,让他们自行判断故事的真相。在南非作家兼插画家亚历克斯·拉蒂默(Alex Latimer)2024年出版的绘本《千万别想老虎》中,叙述者打破第四面墙,向读者许下难以抗拒的承诺:"你手中的这本书有魔法。它的奥秘在于——无论你脑海中浮现什么画面,我都会在下一页画出来。"当试想"跳芭蕾的奶牛"时,书页上果然出现了一头得意洋洋旋转的牛。但随后叙述者警告道:"我真的真的不会画老虎,所以无论如何,请千万别想老虎!"由此展开了全书的笑点:听故事的孩子们根本停不下想象老虎的念头,而他们的每个念头都成了叙述者的指令,于是后续每页都涌现出各种滑稽的老虎形象——方块状的、拎公文包的、甩着美人鱼尾巴的。这位反复练习画虎的叙述者最终技艺娴熟,而"失误乃精通之途"的温和寓意,即便在孩子们陶醉于对叙述者发号施令时,也不会被他们错过。

In Daniel Bernstrom’s “One Day at the Bottom of the Deep Blue Sea” (2025), illustrated by Brandon James Scott, the “boss” in the story (and the adult proxy) is a giant toothy shark who meets his match in a little girl determined not to become his supper. Like Scheherazade telling stories to save her own life, the pigtailed scuba diver must convince the shark that there are better things to eat than herself. Kids will quickly see through her ruses. The girl’s menu offerings include a squid squirting ink, a puffer fish that’s “quite a filling treat,” and a delicacy guaranteed to zap the shark cross-eyed:

在丹尼尔·伯恩斯特伦(Daniel Bernstrom)2025年出版的绘本《深海一日》(One Day at the Bottom of the Deep Blue Sea)中,布兰登·詹姆斯·斯科特(Brandon James Scott)绘制插画,故事里的"大老板"(也是成人世界的化身)是一条龇着尖牙的巨鲨,却遇上了不愿成为他盘中餐的小女孩。正如山鲁佐德为保全性命而讲述故事,这位扎着双马尾的潜水女孩必须说服鲨鱼:世上还有比她更美味的食物。孩子们一眼就能看穿她的把戏。她为鲨鱼列出的菜单包括喷墨的乌贼、"管饱"的河豚,还有一道保证能让鲨鱼吃到斗眼的美味——

“Don’t give up,” said the girl.

“别放弃,”女孩说。

“Ever thought of boneless meat?

"想过无骨肉吗?"

You could try the dotted ray!

不妨试试虚线射线!

It is very safe to eat.”

“吃起来很安全。”

By the time the girl bamboozles the shark into chomping down on a sea turtle’s hard shell, knocking out his teeth, kids will feel almost as sorry for him as they do gratified at being too wise to fall for such tricks. The shark is a pleasing stand-in for a big bossy grownup, easily fooled. Although Bernstrom’s rhyming verses don’t always scan, they have a rollicking energy perfect for reading aloud, and Scott gives his characters a goofy, cartoonish appeal—round eyes, expressive mouths—amid an undersea palette of rich blues, greens, and purples.

当女孩哄骗鲨鱼咬上海龟坚硬的甲壳、磕掉牙齿时,孩子们既会为鲨鱼感到难过,也会因自己足够聪明、不会上这种当而暗自得意。鲨鱼是讨人喜欢的替身,代表着那些专横霸道、容易受骗的大人。尽管伯恩斯特朗的押韵诗句并非总是工整,却充满适合大声朗读的欢快活力;而斯科特笔下的人物——圆眼睛、表情丰富的嘴巴——在深蓝、翠绿与暗紫交织的海底色调中,透着一股傻气又卡通化的魅力。

Even as they make both kids and grownups laugh, these picture books grant children a rare authority over the story, allowing and even encouraging young readers to know more than the characters about what’s actually going on. In the real world, it’s an important human skill to recognize another’s viewpoint: to exercise the muscle that identifies when someone has a bias or when their version of a story tilts to their advantage. Anaïs Nin wrote, “We do not see things as they are, we see them as we are.” Books with unreliable storytellers highlight this fundamental aspect of human nature—while urging kids to think more deeply about why we see things the way we do. ♦

这些绘本在逗乐孩子和大人的同时,赋予儿童一种难得的叙事主导权——允许甚至鼓励小读者比书中角色更清楚究竟发生了什么。在现实世界中,识别他人视角是重要的人类能力:我们需要锻炼这种肌肉,以察觉某人是否带有偏见,或某段叙述是否朝有利于讲述者的方向倾斜。阿娜伊斯·宁曾写道:"我们看见的并非事物本身,而是我们自身。"那些由不可靠叙述者讲述的故事,恰恰凸显了人性的这一根本特质——同时也在敦促孩子们更深入地思考:为何我们总是透过自己的棱镜看待世界?♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month