Infinite Scroll

The Kardashians Explain Everything (Because They Are Everything)

卡戴珊家族解释一切(因为她们就是一切)
A new book by an online Kardashian theorist argues that Kim and clan are the keys to understanding media in the new millennium.
一位网络卡戴珊理论家的新书提出,要理解新千年的媒体生态,金·卡戴珊及其家族正是关键所在。
April 22, 2026
Image may contain Adult Person Face Head Book Comics and Publication
Illustration by Ariel Davis

Told a certain way, the life of Kimberly Noel Kardashian maps neatly onto the entire history of media in the new millennium. In her teen-age years, Kim’s family was part of the biggest televised spectacle to date, as her father, Robert Kardashian, successfully defended O. J. Simpson in his murder trial. In her twenties, Kim worked as a personal stylist for Paris Hilton and showed up as a bit character in Hilton’s reality series “The Simple Life.” That show prompted grumblings that Hilton and her ilk were famous only for being famous, a mantle that Kim soon took up. In 2007, a sex tape starring her with the singer Ray J became an early case study in virality in the streaming era. (Ray J has since claimed that the tape was leaked by Kim and her mother, Kris Jenner, an allegation that they both deny.) The same year saw the début of “Keeping Up with the Kardashians,” which would, of course, become one of the most successful reality franchises ever and transform the Kardashian clan into both television celebrities and online protagonists of innumerable memes derived from choice snippets.

换个角度看,金伯莉·诺埃尔·卡戴珊的人生轨迹,恰好精准映射了新千年以来的媒介发展史。少女时期,她的家庭就卷入了当时最轰动的电视直播事件——父亲罗伯特·卡戴珊成功为O.J.辛普森杀妻案辩护。二十来岁时,她担任帕丽斯·希尔顿的私人造型师,在希尔顿的真人秀《简单生活》里跑过龙套。那档节目曾引发非议:希尔顿之流不过是"为出名而出名"——这项帽子很快被金接了过去。2007年,她与歌手雷·J的性爱录像带成为流媒体时代病毒传播的早期案例(雷·J后来声称录像带是金与其母克里斯·詹纳故意泄露,两人均予否认)。同年开播的《与卡戴珊一家同行》,日后自然成为史上最成功的真人秀系列之一,将这个家族塑造成电视明星的同时,更让她们成为网络迷因的永恒主角——那些精心剪辑的片段在无数二次创作中永生。

TV made the Kardashian clan, but the internet clinched and multiplied their fame—they are “new media” celebrities, perhaps the biggest examples thereof, as the writer and psychotherapist M. J. Corey documents in her book “Dekonstructing the Kardashians: A New Media Manifesto.” Kim and her siblings, particularly her half sisters, Kendall and Kylie Jenner, built up millions of followers in the early days of social media, becoming ur-stars of Twitter and Instagram. (One of Kim’s memorably random tweets from 2010: “Nicole Richie reminds me of my jeep.”) Kim’s climb from there to the glam heights of Hollywood inspired a mobile game in 2014, the goal of which was to rise from the E-list to the A-list of celebrity. Her buxom re-creation of a Grace Jones photograph for the cover of Paper was designed to “break the internet,” as the magazine itself trumpeted. In 2015, her voluminous selfies were collected in a glossy book published by Rizzoli, titled “Selfish,” which helped to legitimatize a genre once derided for its narcissism as a modern mode of self-expression. Her marriage to Kanye West cemented a new kind of multi-platform fame, as the couple became omnipresent cultural forces in music, fashion, television, beauty, and even religion, when they launched a “Sunday Service” series of spiritual events, complete with streetwear. Propelled by our algorithmic feeds onto every small screen, in every conceivable format, Kim Kardashian became less an individual mega-celebrity than a scalable digital spectacle, attaining the kind of iconicity that the entire family seems to crave; they have even been known to turn Robert, their late patriarch, into a hologram to dispense fatherly wisdom.

电视造就了卡戴珊家族,但互联网巩固并放大了她们的名声——正如作家兼心理治疗师M·J·科里在其著作《解构卡戴珊:一份新媒体宣言》中所记载的,她们是"新媒体"名人,或许是最具代表性的范例。金·卡戴珊和她的兄弟姐妹们,尤其是同母异父的妹妹肯达尔·詹娜与凯莉·詹娜,在社交媒体兴起之初便积累了数百万粉丝,成为推特和Instagram的元祖级明星(金在2010年那条令人难忘的无厘头推文:"妮可·里奇让我想起我的吉普车")。金从那里一路攀升至好莱坞的璀璨巅峰,甚至在2014年催生了一款手机游戏,目标是从E级名人晋升为A级巨星。她为《Paper》杂志封面丰满复刻格蕾丝·琼斯经典照片的造型,被杂志社宣扬为旨在"让互联网瘫痪"。2015年,她海量的自拍照被集结成册,由里佐利出版社推出光面精装书《自私》,这部作品帮助将曾被讥为自恋的自拍体裁,正名为现代自我表达的新模式。她与坎耶·韦斯特的婚姻则巩固了一种新型的多平台名人效应——这对夫妇成为音乐、时尚、电视、美妆乃至宗教领域无处不在的文化力量,他们推出的"周日礼拜"系列灵修活动甚至融入了街头服饰元素。在算法推送的驱动下,金·卡戴珊以各种可想象的形式出现在每块小屏幕上,她不再仅仅是个体超级名人,更成为一种可扩展的数字奇观,达到了整个家族似乎都渴求的偶像地位;她们甚至曾将已故族长罗伯特的全息影像召唤出来,用以传递父亲的智慧。

Corey has long operated as a kind of meta-Kardashian influencer online, building up hundreds of thousands of followers across Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube by sharing conversational videos (“why fans feel betrayed”) and Kardashian memes remixed with quotes from critical theory (Kris Jenner x Chris Kraus) under the name Kardashian Kolloquium. (Corey is a pseudonym; she studied creative nonfiction and counselling psychology at Columbia and has contributed pieces of Kimlinology to The New Yorker.) The book, an extension of this œuvre, deploys a litany of canonical media theorists and philosophers—Jean Baudrillard, Walter Benjamin, Marshall McLuhan, Pierre Bourdieu, Thorstein Veblen—to argue that the Kardashians are “an intentional amalgamation,” “a composite of historical touch points, media tropes, and shifting identities.” They are ciphers that consciously assume whatever shapes are most likely to gain them the most exposure—in other words, they are flesh-and-blood memes.

科里长期在网络上扮演着某种"元卡戴珊"式的影响者,她在Instagram、TikTok和YouTube等平台积累了数十万粉丝,以"卡戴珊研讨会"为名发布对话式视频(如"为何粉丝感到被背叛"),并将批判理论语录与卡戴珊家族梗图混搭创作(例如克里斯·詹纳与克里斯·克劳斯的跨界组合)。(科里是化名;她曾在哥伦比亚大学攻读创意非虚构写作与咨询心理学,并为《纽约客》撰写过金·卡戴珊现象分析文章。)这部著作是她创作脉络的延伸,书中援引了让·鲍德里亚、瓦尔特·本雅明、马歇尔·麦克卢汉、皮埃尔·布迪厄、托斯丹·凡勃伦等一长串经典媒体理论家与哲学家的论述,力图论证卡戴珊家族是"刻意拼合的产物",是"历史节点、媒体套路与流动身份认同的复合体"。她们如同密码般有意识地变幻成最能吸引曝光的形态——换言之,她们是血肉铸就的迷因。

Corey charts the many different pop-cultural archetypes that the Kardashians, and Kim in particular, have played with through the years, often by playing dress-up: the all-American romantic doom of Marilyn Monroe, the ethnically ambiguous curvaceousness of Disney’s Princess Jasmine, the wifely devotion of Jacqueline Kennedy, the girl-group antics of the Spice Girls (when Kim dressed up as Posh in high school). Kim excels at metabolizing the idols of past eras—“performing the particular thrill of borrowed glamour,” Corey writes—but she is also a bellwether of the present. Extravagantly mutable and well maintained, the Kardashians’ very bodies have morphed to take on trends. Their self-transformations include Kylie’s filler-stuffed lips, Kim’s rumored Brazilian butt lift, and Kris’s recently publicized facelift, all of which helped inject such cosmetic procedures into the mainstream. “Kim’s ass . . . seemed to expand in tandem with all the growing interest in her body,” Corey writes. The more ass, the more attention—at least until that particular semiotic bubble popped, and the Kardashians appeared to deflate their rear ends, around 2022. Swapping paramours, hobbies, and physical features, the Kardashians shape—and epitomize—the Zeitgeist.

科里梳理了卡戴珊家族——尤其是金·卡戴珊——多年来通过角色扮演所演绎的众多流行文化原型:玛丽莲·梦露式的美国式浪漫宿命,迪士尼茉莉公主式的族裔模糊的丰腴曲线,杰奎琳·肯尼迪式的贤妻奉献精神,辣妹组合式的女子团体搞怪姿态(金在高中时就曾扮成"高贵辣妹")。金擅长消化过往时代的偶像——科里写道,她"演绎着借来的魅惑所带来的独特颤栗",但她同时也是当下的风向标。卡戴珊家族的身体本身就以极度可变且精心维护的状态,顺应着潮流不断变形。她们的自我改造包括凯莉注射填充物的丰唇、传闻中金的巴西提臀术,以及克丽丝最近公开的拉皮手术——所有这些都助推了这类美容项目进入主流视野。"金的臀部……似乎随着公众对她身体日益增长的兴趣同步扩张,"科里写道。臀部越丰满,关注度越高——至少直到这个特定的符号泡沫在2022年左右破裂,卡戴珊家族似乎才开始让臀部曲线收敛。通过更换情人、爱好与身体特征,卡戴珊家族既塑造着时代精神,也成为了时代精神的缩影。

Corey is at her best when parsing the ways in which the Kardashians resonate with their vast audience. They are aspirational American consumers, flaunting their luxury-brand logos, in addition to being models of the American dream, as billionaire entrepreneurs. (The Kar-Jenner sisters have benefitted from collabs between their respective companies, such as a KKW x Kylie “lip set,” and from posing for Kim’s Kardashian-silhouette-inspired shapewear brand, Skims.) They are relatable mothers, daughters, sisters, and stepsiblings, as a blended family whose tumultuous relationships are documented on reality TV. The book is studded with amusing pieces of Kardashian lore that might be familiar only to devotees. Do you remember Kimoji, a $1.99 mobile app that provided two hundred and fifty Kim-themed emoji? The family once used prosthetic costumes to blend into the normie crowd on a Hollywood bus tour, only to make a run for it to escape photo-takers. Kimye’s 2022 divorce saga was effectively styled by Balenciaga, incepting the label into the public consciousness, one paparazzi photo at a time. Corey pithily sums up Kim’s pattern “of accommodating the public’s appetite for private affairs, and of making reality out of make-believe.”

科里最擅长剖析卡戴珊家族如何与广大观众产生共鸣。她们既是美国梦的典范——作为亿万富翁企业家,炫耀着奢侈品牌标志;也是令人向往的美国消费者。(卡戴珊-詹纳姐妹从各自公司的合作中获益,比如KKW与凯莉联名的"唇妆套装",以及为金·卡戴珊以自家身形为灵感设计的内衣品牌Skims拍摄宣传照。)她们还是可亲的母亲、女儿、姐妹和继兄弟姐妹,这个重组家庭在真人秀中记录着动荡的情感关系。书中点缀着许多有趣的卡戴珊家族轶事,可能只有忠实粉丝才熟悉。你还记得售价1.99美元、包含250个金·卡戴珊主题表情包的Kimoji手机应用吗?这家人曾穿着仿真服装混入好莱坞观光巴士的普通游客中,最后不得不狂奔躲避拍照者。金·卡戴珊与坎耶·韦斯特2022年的离婚风波被巴黎世家巧妙包装,通过一张张狗仔队照片,将这个品牌烙印在公众意识中。科里精辟地总结了金·卡戴珊的模式:"既满足公众对私事的窥探欲,又将虚构转化为现实。"

Yet “Dekonstructing the Kardashians” is also a frustratingly frenetic and recursive book, whose agglomeration of details doesn’t always amount to a deeper narrative. It can read like social-media commentary, with disjointed riffing on one subject after another, and familiar critical ideas trotted out repeatedly. Corey references McLuhan’s famous dictum “The medium is the message” in the book’s preface, then repeats it three times in the first chapter, then once more, for good measure, in the sixth. In a final “Archives” section, she writes, “Now is a good time to bring in good old Marshall McLuhan.” (The McLuhan is the message.) The book seems designed for an online follower of Corey’s, who already knows the details of the Kardashian story and craves exegesis. The lay reader would benefit from a more sustained, linear biography of Kardashianism, but even in the latter half of the book, which proceeds roughly chronologically, the text darts among subjects and eras, often in the span of the same paragraph. A passage about varieties of self-concealment skips from ninjas to Odysseus to Mark Twain’s “The Prince and the Pauper.” Ironically, the Kardashians themselves, usually so expert at capturing attention, get lost in the mix.

然而,《解构卡戴珊家族》也是一本令人沮丧的狂乱而循环往复的书,其堆积的细节并不总能构成更深层的叙事。它读起来像是社交媒体评论,对一个又一个主题进行脱节的即兴发挥,并反复抛出熟悉的批判观点。科里在本书前言中引用了麦克卢汉的名言"媒介即讯息",随后在第一章重复了三次,第六章又为求稳妥再次提及。在最后的"档案"部分,她写道:"现在是时候请出我们亲爱的马歇尔·麦克卢汉了。"(麦克卢汉即讯息。)这本书似乎是为科里的网络追随者设计的,他们早已熟知卡戴珊家族的故事细节,渴望得到诠释。普通读者本可从更连贯、线性的卡戴珊主义传记中获益,但即便在本书大致按时间顺序推进的后半部分,文本仍在不同主题与时代间跳跃,往往在同一段落内就转换话题。一段关于自我隐藏方式的论述,从忍者跳到奥德修斯,再跳到马克·吐温的《王子与贫儿》。具有讽刺意味的是,向来擅长吸引注意力的卡戴珊家族成员,反而在这片纷乱中失焦了。

Corey is generous in quoting the works of other writers (myself among them) and includes many Kardashian-fandom social posts as a kind of vox populi, but an overabundance of references disrupts the flow of larger ideas. The book is more dekonstruction and less manifesto; its credo may be contained in the line “To me, the Kardashians are no different from other enduring national institutions such as Las Vegas, Disney, and the WWE,” which is not a particularly controversial statement about a family that has long been accepted as American royalty. One of the book’s more sustained, intriguing scenes comes, several hundred pages in, when Corey describes how she came to start posting videos about the Kardashians. She was staying at her mother’s home in Arizona during the pandemic and began filming herself in the carport, after getting advice from a Gen Z friend that “pop culture-tok” could be a good home for cultural commentary that she had begun to do on Instagram. She went from having fifteen thousand followers on Instagram to more than a hundred and eighty thousand on TikTok. “If I’d learned anything from the Kardashians, it was that diversifying mediums is a wise move,” Corey writes. The Kardashian scholar had become a Kardashian-style content creator.

科里在书中慷慨引用了其他作者(包括我本人)的作品,并收录了大量卡戴珊粉丝的社交媒体帖子作为民间声音的呈现,但过多的征引材料有时会打断核心思想的连贯脉络。这本书更像是一场解构而非宣言;其核心观点或许凝结在这句话中:"对我而言,卡戴珊家族与拉斯维加斯、迪士尼、WWE等美国长青文化机构并无二致。"——对于这个早已被奉为美国名流王朝的家族而言,这实在算不上什么惊世骇俗的论断。全书最耐人寻味的持续性场景出现在数百页之后:科里描述了自己如何开始制作卡戴珊主题视频。疫情期间她暂居亚利桑那州的母亲家中,在得到Z世代朋友"流行文化短视频可能是文化评论的理想载体"的建议后(此前她已在Instagram开展文化评论),便开始在车库里录制视频。她的粉丝数从Instagram的一万五千人激增至TikTok的十八万以上。"若说从卡戴珊家族学到了什么,那便是媒介多元化总是明智之举,"科里写道。这位卡戴珊文化研究者,已然蜕变为卡戴珊式的内容创作者。

If you hitch your fortunes to the Kardashians for long enough, you’re bound to get ensnared in one drama or another. Late in the book, Corey describes the harassment she faced when she declined to weigh in on a Balenciaga controversy that some observers felt implicated Kim and Kanye by association. “It was my job, as a volunteer cultural critic, to deconstruct and then moralize about such a revelation, as everyone else on the platform was doing,” Corey writes in an apt summary of a writer’s current role on the internet. Other accounts then tried to rage-bait their followers into attacking Corey’s “silence.” Attention online—which is to say, the modern entertainment industry at large—can look a bit like a pyramid scheme, with each lower layer trying to siphon a segment of audience away from the more famous one above. It is that ruthless practice of eliciting engagement at any cost that may be the Kardashians’ true innovation, and the life style is not for everyone. As Corey writes, “I just wanted to post my wannabe Barthes takes in peace.” ♦

若你长久地将自己的命运与卡戴珊家族捆绑,便注定会被卷入一场又一场的纷争。在书的末尾,科里描述了自己因拒绝就巴黎世家(Balenciaga)争议事件表态而遭受的骚扰——部分观察者认为该事件通过关联效应牵涉到了金·卡戴珊与坎耶·韦斯特。"作为志愿文化评论者,我的职责本应是像平台上所有人那样,对此类事件进行解构并作出道德评判,"科里如此写道,精准概括了当下写作者在网络环境中的角色。随后,其他账号试图煽动粉丝攻击科里的"沉默"。网络世界的关注度——或者说整个现代娱乐产业——运作模式近似金字塔骗局,每一层都试图从更知名的上层那里分流一部分受众。这种不惜一切代价博取参与度的残酷法则,或许才是卡戴珊家族真正的创新,而这样的生活方式并非人人皆可承受。正如科里所写:"我只想安安静静地发表我那些模仿罗兰·巴特风格的见解。" ♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month