The Current Cinema

“The Invite” Is a Witty Relationship Comedy That Could Be Wilder

《邀约》:一部机智的关系喜剧,本可以更大胆
In Olivia Wilde’s bickersome couples comedy, an evening of refreshments and recriminations leads to an intriguing proposition.
在奥利维娅·王尔德这部争吵不休的伴侣喜剧中,一个充满茶点与互相指责的夜晚,引出了一个耐人寻味的提议。
Two couples facing each other in an apartment.
Illustration by Madison Ketcham

“The Invite” begins with an aphorism: “One should always be in love. That is the reason one should never marry.” The words are from Oscar Wilde, and the movie is from Olivia Wilde, née Olivia Jane Cockburn, who adopted the professional surname years ago, in honor of the many pseudonymous Irish writers in her family. Some might see hubris in her choice of namesake, and I wouldn’t disagree, though I also wouldn’t judge: Who’s to say who is or isn’t truly Wilde at heart? “The Invite,” her third feature as a filmmaker, has its own tart, unflattering view of matrimony. The script, by Will McCormack and Rashida Jones, takes the form of a chamber piece, its four bickersome characters confined to one location for the better part of two hours—as close to the Oscar-worthy tradition of drawing-room comedy as Olivia has come.

《邀约》以一句格言开场:“人应当永远在恋爱。这就是人绝不该结婚的理由。”这句话出自奥斯卡·王尔德,而这部电影出自奥利维娅·王尔德——她本名奥利维娅·简·科克本,多年前取了这个艺名,以向她家族中多位使用笔名的爱尔兰作家致敬。有人或许会觉得她选这个名字未免有些狂妄,我也不反对这种看法,但同样不想妄加评判:谁能断定谁骨子里是或不是真正的王尔德呢?《邀约》是她作为导演的第三部长片,对婚姻有着同样尖刻、毫不美化的看法。剧本由威尔·麦科马克和拉什达·琼斯执笔,采用室内剧的形式,四个争吵不休的角色在将近两小时里被限制在同一地点——这是奥利维娅迄今为止最接近奥斯卡·王尔德式客厅喜剧传统的一次尝试。

The drawing room, in this case, is a recently renovated San Francisco apartment, where a married couple, Joe (Seth Rogen) and Angela (Wilde herself), live with their twelve-year-old daughter, Maggie. The kid is away at a sleepover, and Angela has invited the upstairs neighbors, Piña (Penélope Cruz) and Hawk (Edward Norton), over for an evening of wine and charcuterie. Joe, grumpily returning from work, claims to be blindsided by this news, though Angela insists that she told him ages ago—the first disagreement of many. She’s a whirlwind of activity and a ball of nerves, slapping his hand away from the hors d’œuvres and berating him for having forgotten to pick up a bottle of wine. Joe, an equally instinctive complainer, is also a shit-stirrer par excellence. The one benefit of having Piña and Hawk over, he reckons, is that he can finally confront them about their noisy sex life.

这个“客厅”,在这里是一套刚翻修过的旧金山公寓,住着一对夫妇,乔(塞斯·罗根饰)和安吉拉(王尔德本人饰),以及他们十二岁的女儿玛吉。孩子外出参加睡衣派对,安吉拉邀请了楼上的邻居皮尼亚(佩内洛普·克鲁兹饰)和霍克(爱德华·诺顿饰)来家里喝酒、吃冷切肉。乔下班回来,一脸不悦,声称自己对这消息一无所知,安吉拉则坚称自己早就告诉过他——这是诸多分歧中的第一个。她忙得像一阵旋风,又紧张得像一团乱麻,一巴掌拍开他伸向开胃菜的手,斥责他忘了买瓶酒回来。乔,一个同样本能地爱抱怨的人,也是挑拨离间的高手。他觉得,请皮尼亚和霍克过来唯一的好处,就是终于可以当面质问他们那吵死人的性生活了。

This particular grievance carries an unmistakable whiff of jealousy, and I was reminded of an earlier comedy, “Neighbors” (2014), in which Rogen plays a husband and a father confronting the rowdy frat guys next door—and feeling, amid his irritation, a twinge of envy and loss. Twelve years later, there’s more salt and pepper in Rogen’s beard and more vinegar in his demeanor; the let-it-all-hang-out comic boisterousness of his Judd Apatow days has hardened into a shell of middle-aged aggression. Joe looks at his pleasant, comfortable life and sees an abyss. Once an indie-rock front man whose band flamed out after one big hit, he now teaches music—cue the sad trombones—at a good-not-great Bay Area conservatory. Even their gorgeous apartment is, for him, an emblem of failure: it’s the home he grew up in, and one that he could never have afforded, only inherited. For Angela, by contrast, the place is her singular creative outlet, the sole use for her otherwise untapped art-school degree. Wilde and her superb production designer, Jade Healy, treat the apartment as a lovingly furnished combat zone, a space malleable enough to convey either entrapment or distance. The living room can turn suddenly cold and cavernous, with Joe and Angela yelling at each other across an emotional chasm. But then we’ll follow them into the closer quarters of the master bedroom, the one unfinished room in the apartment, where Angela has yet to settle on a paint color—a bit of indecision that reads as profound ambivalence about their marriage.

这个特别的怨言带着一丝掩饰不住的嫉妒意味,让我想起一部更早的喜剧《邻居大战》(2014),片中罗根饰演一位丈夫兼父亲,与隔壁吵闹的兄弟会男生对峙——在恼怒之余,又感到一丝羡慕和失落。十二年过去,罗根的胡须里多了些花白,举止间多了些尖酸;他在贾德·阿帕图时代那种毫无顾忌的喜剧张扬,已硬化为一层中年人的攻击性外壳。乔看着自己舒适、体面的生活,看到的却是一个深渊。他曾是一支独立摇滚乐队的主唱,乐队在一首大热单曲后便销声匿迹,如今他在湾区一所不错但算不上顶尖的音乐学院教音乐——此处应有悲伤的长号声。就连他们那套漂亮的公寓,对他来说也是失败的象征:这是他从小长大的家,一栋他永远买不起、只能靠继承得来的房子。而对安吉拉来说,恰恰相反,这地方是她唯一的创作出口,是她那否则毫无用武之地的艺术学位唯一派上用场的地方。王尔德和她出色的美术指导杰德·希利将这套公寓处理成一个精心布置的战场,一个足够灵活、既能传达困顿感也能表达疏离感的空间。客厅会突然变得冰冷而空旷,乔和安吉拉隔着一条情感的鸿沟互相吼叫。但接着,我们会跟随他们进入主卧那个更私密的空间,那是公寓里唯一未完工的房间,安吉拉还没决定好刷什么颜色的漆——这一点犹豫不决,读起来就像是对他们婚姻的深刻摇摆。

Wilde’s previous feature, the dystopian thriller “Don’t Worry Darling” (2022), was a through-the-looking-glass nightmare of nineteen-fifties-style suburbia whose visual conceits felt thuddingly obvious; nearly every shot screamed “Danger!” so loudly that you couldn’t help but search for the exit. “The Invite” is a more compressed, disciplined affair—a return to the dexterous wit of her début, the teen comedy “Booksmart” (2019). But even here, Wilde’s stylistic choices can veer from shrewd to overly studied. The apartment, though no one’s idea of a fun house, is bedecked with mirrors, and, early on, the cinematographer Adam Newport-Berra uses them to splinter the couple’s every argument into fragments. A reflective shot might juxtapose two Angelas and one Joe, or isolate one spouse in the foreground and the other in the mirror behind them. The effect is distracting yet apt: at no point are husband and wife fully inhabiting the same plane.

王尔德上一部长片是反乌托邦惊悚片《亲爱的别担心》(2022),那是一部关于1950年代风格郊区的幻梦般的噩梦,其视觉手法直白得令人感到沉闷;几乎每个镜头都在尖叫“危险!”,让你忍不住想找出口。《邀约》则是一部更紧凑、更克制的作品——回归了她处女作、青少年喜剧《高材生》(2019)中那种灵巧的机智。但即便在这里,王尔德的风格选择也可能从精明滑向过度雕琢。这套公寓虽然绝不是个好玩的地方,却挂满了镜子,影片一开始,摄影师亚当·纽波特-贝拉就用这些镜子将这对夫妇的每一次争吵都切割成碎片。一个反射镜头可能并置两个安吉拉和一个乔,或者将一方置于前景,另一方置于他们身后的镜中。效果令人分心,却又恰如其分:丈夫和妻子从未完全共处于同一个平面。

Musically, too, the movie tends toward the overwrought; the score, by Dev Hynes, is so awash in ominously thrumming cello strings you might wonder if the term “chamber piece” has been taken literally. And yet Joe and Angela’s animosity is underscored by an absence of song. No one is allowed to play Joe’s one-hit-wonder record, or to touch the piano that now gathers dust in his office. Only when Hawk and Piña finally show up, interrupting Joe and Angela mid-argument, does anyone dare to break this rule—or to suggest that another kind of beautiful music might yet be made.

音乐上,这部电影也倾向于用力过猛;德夫·海因斯创作的配乐充斥着不祥的低沉大提琴弦音,你可能会怀疑“室内乐”这个词是不是被按字面意思理解了。然而,乔和安吉拉的敌意,恰恰被歌曲的缺席所强调。谁也不许播放乔那首昙花一现的热门唱片,也不许碰那架在他办公室里积灰的钢琴。直到霍克和皮尼亚终于出现,打断了乔和安吉拉吵到一半的架,才有人敢打破这条规矩——或者说,才有人敢暗示,或许还能奏出另一种美妙的音乐。

In the annals of double-date-from-hell movies, “The Invite” is neither as good as “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” (1966), Mike Nichols’s still crackling adaptation of Edward Albee’s play, nor as bad as “Carnage” (2011), Roman Polanski’s mirthless film version of Yasmina Reza’s “God of Carnage.” As it happens, Wilde’s movie is a redo of a Spanish comedy, “The People Upstairs” (2020), which the director and screenwriter Cesc Gay adapted from his own stage work. Gay’s movie has already spawned Italian, Swiss, French, and South Korean remakes, though “The Invite” is the first to honor its lineage by casting a Spanish actor as one of its principals—either that, or it was simply and wisely decided that no one but Penélope Cruz could play Piña. A psychotherapist and a sexologist, she styles her hair in a fetching mass of blond locks and dark roots, and sweeps into the apartment with a suave self-assurance that reduces Angela to even more of a stammering wreck. (Wilde is a terrific director of actors, herself included.) When the subject turns, inevitably, to Piña’s high-volume sex life, she makes a heartfelt apology but couldn’t seem less embarrassed; in her eyes, we see a matter-of-fact merriment, plus a glimmer of naughty intent. She is, on paper, the character who drifts closest to caricature—the hot-blooded Euro-chic seductress—and yet, onscreen, she’s the one figure the movie can’t bring itself to mock. She knows herself too well, and is too comfortable in her skin, to make ridicule an option.

在地狱般的四人约会电影史册中,《邀约》既不如《灵欲春宵》(1966)——迈克·尼科尔斯对爱德华·阿尔比剧作至今仍火花四溅的改编——那么好,也不像《杀戮》(2011)——罗曼·波兰斯基对雅丝米娜·雷札《杀戮之神》毫无幽默感的电影版——那么糟。巧的是,王尔德的这部电影翻拍自一部西班牙喜剧《楼上的人》(2020),由导演兼编剧塞斯克·盖伊根据自己的舞台剧改编。盖伊的电影已经催生了意大利、瑞士、法国和韩国的翻拍版,不过《邀约》是第一个通过选用一位西班牙演员担任主角之一来致敬其血统的版本——要么就是大家干脆而明智地认定,只有佩内洛普·克鲁兹能演皮尼亚。她是一位心理治疗师兼性学家,一头金发间露出深色发根,发型迷人,带着一种温文尔雅的自信飘然走进公寓,让安吉拉更加紧张得语无伦次。(王尔德是一位出色的演员导演,对她自己也一样。)当话题不可避免地转向皮尼亚那音量过高的性生活时,她表达了诚挚的歉意,却似乎一点也不觉得尴尬;在她眼中,我们看到一种实事求是的愉悦,外加一丝顽皮的意图。从纸面上看,她是最接近刻板形象的角色——那个热血、欧式时髦的诱惑者——然而在银幕上,她是这部电影不忍心嘲弄的唯一人物。她太了解自己,也太自在了,让人无从讥讽。

Hawk is another story. We initially take our cues from Joe, who can’t stand the guy and doesn’t buy his ludicrous name, his insistent friendliness, his patronizing New Age sensitivity, the fact that he used to be a firefighter. Hawk lays everything on a touch too thick, whether he’s praising Angela’s taste in rugs or even complimenting Joe’s brutal honesty. (“We love a contentious environment,” Hawk declares, by way of either defusing or aggravating the evident tension between his hosts.) Norton, like few other actors, can turn on the charm and the smarm as if they were side-by-side faucets, and what’s disarming about the performance is the way he keeps twisting the taps—flooding us with decency one moment, reverting to smug insufferableness the next. All in all, though, Piña and Hawk’s arrival is a relief; despite untold opportunities for fresh awkwardness and turmoil, the film seems more at ease in the company of guests. The camera steadies itself, the strings and mirrors take a break, and you can sense Wilde’s confidence in her material growing. It’s as if the movie itself grasps that four is better than two—a lesson that has a very specific application where the characters are concerned.

霍克则是另一回事。我们最初跟着乔的视角走,乔受不了这家伙,也不信他那可笑的名字、他那热络得过分的友善、他那居高临下的新时代敏感做派,以及他曾当过消防员这件事。霍克什么都做得有点过头,无论是夸赞安吉拉挑地毯的品味,还是甚至恭维乔那毫不留情的诚实。(“我们就喜欢有火药味的环境,”霍克宣称,这话不知是想缓和还是加剧两位主人之间显而易见的紧张关系。)诺顿和少数演员一样,能把魅力和谄媚像并排的水龙头一样随时切换,而这场表演令人卸下防备的地方,就在于他不停地拧动这两个龙头——一会儿用体面将我们淹没,下一秒又变回那副自鸣得意、令人难以忍受的样子。不过,总的来说,皮尼亚和霍克的到来是一种解脱;尽管有无数次机会制造新的尴尬和混乱,但影片在客人陪伴下似乎更自在。镜头稳定下来,弦乐和镜子也歇了口气,你能感觉到王尔德对自己素材的信心在增长。仿佛电影本身也明白,四个人比两个人好——这个道理,对角色的处境而言,有着非常具体的应用。

Read no further if you wish to preserve the purity of the viewing experience, but Wilde’s film is at its fleeting best in the realms of the impure. Piña and Hawk, we learn, like to host group-sex parties, and it is they, not Angela, who end up extending the invite of the title. The fallout of that inquiry—to which Joe and Angela gamely acquiesce—generates its share of laughs, though our amusement comes at a cost. A sudden swerve into experimental terrain is just as swiftly preëmpted by some predictable slapstick and a fresh round of couples therapy—all so that, in the end, the threat of polyamory can be banished, the blessings of monogamy reasserted, and Oscar Wilde’s disdain for marriage decisively disproved. The closing moments are sweet and poignant; they also suggest a failure of nerve. I’m not saying “The Invite” needed an orgiastic climax—only that it might have benefitted, like any relationship, from less fidelity to a preëxisting script, and perhaps a drop more of its characters’ own courage. What happens onscreen isn’t just coitus interruptus; given how quickly the neighbors quit the premises, it’s more like a premature evacuation. ♦

如果你想保持观影体验的纯粹,就不要再往下读了,但王尔德的电影恰恰是在不纯粹的领域里,才展现出它转瞬即逝的最佳状态。我们得知,皮尼亚和霍克喜欢举办群体性爱派对,而发出片名所指的那份邀约的,是他们,不是安吉拉。那个询问——乔和安吉拉鼓起勇气接受了——所引发的后果,制造了不少笑料,尽管我们的乐趣是有代价的。一次突然转向实验性领域的尝试,很快就被一些可预见的闹剧和新一轮伴侣心理治疗给抢先阻止了——这一切,都是为了在最后,多角恋的威胁可以被驱逐,一夫一妻制的福祉得以重申,而奥斯卡·王尔德对婚姻的鄙夷也被断然证伪。结尾的时刻甜蜜而令人感伤;它们也暗示着一种勇气的缺失。我并不是说《邀约》需要一个狂欢的高潮——只是说,它或许能像任何一段关系那样,从对既定剧本少一点忠诚、再多一滴角色们自身的勇气中获益。银幕上发生的,不只是性交中断;考虑到邻居们撤离得如此之快,这更像是过早离场。 ♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month