The Front Row

The History of Jazz Has Instantly Expanded

爵士乐的历史瞬间被改写了
Newly released archival live performances by Ahmad Jamal, Joe Henderson, and Cecil Taylor illuminate their legacies and the art form at large.
新近发布的艾哈迈德·贾马尔、乔·亨德森与塞西尔·泰勒现场演奏档案,不仅照亮了他们的艺术遗产,更映现出爵士乐这门艺术形式的辽阔光谱。
April 21, 2026
Figure holds a cigarette and sits by the piano
Photograph by Dennis Stock / Magnum

As far as commercial holidays go, Record Store Day is a virtuous occasion, because recorded music is among the wonders of the world, and the survival of physical media is crucial to the future of art. In the realm of jazz, the holiday’s hero is the producer Zev Feldman, who is responsible for a long and transformative run of releases from previously unavailable archival sources. To mark the latest Record Store Day (April 18th), working with a variety of labels, he has brought forth treasures that both deepen the history of jazz and expand the art form’s imaginative range. Three of the new sets (also available on CD and via digital download on April 24th) offer revelatory experiences of musicians whom I’ve been listening to for half a century—Cecil Taylor, Ahmad Jamal, and Joe Henderson. Delightful old recordings are rediscovered year in and year out, but it is rare for new entries in extensive discographies to feel instantly canonical.

在商业节日中,唱片店日(Record Store Day)堪称一股清流——毕竟录音音乐是人类文明的瑰宝,实体媒介的存续对艺术的未来至关重要。爵士乐领域的节日英雄当属制作人泽夫·费尔德曼(Zev Feldman),他长期致力于发掘尘封档案,推出了一系列改变行业格局的唱片。为迎接4月18日的最新唱片店日,他与多家厂牌合作呈献的珍藏,既深化了爵士乐的历史脉络,又拓展了这门艺术形式的想象疆界。其中三套新作(CD与数字下载版将于4月24日同步发行)让我这位聆听者历经半世纪后,对塞西尔·泰勒(Cecil Taylor)、艾哈迈德·贾马尔(Ahmad Jamal)和乔·亨德森(Joe Henderson)三位音乐家获得了颠覆性的认知。虽然每年都有令人惊喜的老录音重见天日,但能在卷帙浩繁的唱片目录中甫一问世即奠定经典地位的,实属凤毛麟角。

The albums by Jamal and Henderson are from the nineteen-seventies, a time when jazz was in crisis—and their performances, both recorded in concert at the same venue (Chicago’s Jazz Showcase), present personal responses to the artists’ own situations and to the state of the music at large. As for Taylor’s recording, from the late sixties, it defines a bold advance in jazz that nevertheless reconnects with the music’s traditions.

贾马尔和亨德森的专辑均出自上世纪七十年代,彼时爵士乐正陷入危机——这两张现场录音均录制于芝加哥爵士秀场,既呈现了艺术家对自身处境的回应,也折射出当时爵士乐的整体生态。至于泰勒在六十年代末的录音,则标志着爵士乐一次与传统重新联结的大胆跃进。

Ahmad Jamal, “At the Jazz Showcase: Live in Chicago”
Resonance Records

艾哈迈德·贾马尔(Ahmad Jamal),《爵士秀场:芝加哥现场》(At the Jazz Showcase: Live in Chicago),共振唱片(Resonance Records)

Jamal started his recording career in 1951 with a style of piano playing so unusual that it was often grossly misunderstood and underestimated (including, in 1958, in the pages of The New Yorker). Eschewing the profusion and complexity of the era’s bebop pianists (foremost, Bud Powell), Jamal played sparely, creating arrangements for trios that served as backdrops for his improvisations of stark strokes and elegant gestures, sharp punctuations and witty melodic distillations. He neither accompanied other soloists nor had wind-instrument sidemen in his band. But, by the mid-sixties, Jamal’s style changed. Working with a new, looser generation of drummers, he went from restrained to overflowing, playing denser and more emphatically expressive solos, albeit without sacrificing wit or melody. That transformation came at a cost: in the late fifties, Jamal had enjoyed great commercial success, but in the next decade his popularity waned. The trouble wasn’t his alone. Rock was supplanting the show-tune-based Great American Songbook—Jamal’s prime source—as the musical mainstream, and by the seventies popular jazz was heavily tinged with “fusion” elements (electric instruments, borrowings from rock and R. & B.) that often came at the expense of improvised solos. Jamal acceded to the trend and made several electric-based albums in pop modes that ranged from funk to easy listening. But the new album, “At the Jazz Showcase: Live in Chicago,” features live performances from March of 1976 that sound like a revolt against commercial concessions.

贾马尔(Jamal)于1951年开启录音生涯,其钢琴演奏风格如此独特,以至于常常遭到严重误解与低估(1958年《纽约客》的乐评亦不例外)。他避开了当时波普钢琴家繁复华丽的演奏风格(以巴德·鲍威尔[Bud Powell]为代表),以极简手法构建三重奏编曲,为即兴演奏铺就底色——时而挥洒凌厉笔触与优雅姿态,时而迸发锐利顿挫与诙谐旋律。他既不担任其他独奏乐手的伴奏,也从不任用管乐手作为乐队成员。但到六十年代中期,贾马尔的风格开始转变。在与新一代更自由随性的鼓手合作中,他从克制走向奔涌,独奏变得绵密而更具表现力,却未牺牲其特有的机锋与旋律美感。这种转变付出了代价:五十年代末期贾马尔曾获得巨大商业成功,而此后十年间他的受欢迎程度逐渐衰退。困境并非独属于他。摇滚乐正取代以音乐剧曲调为基础的"美国经典歌集"——贾马尔的核心创作源泉——成为主流音乐;到七十年代,流行爵士乐已深深浸染"融合"元素(电声乐器、借鉴摇滚与节奏布鲁斯),即兴独奏的空间往往因此被挤压。贾马尔顺应潮流,推出多张以电声乐器为主的流行风格专辑,涵盖放克到轻音乐等多种类型。但新专辑《在爵士秀场:芝加哥现场》收录的1976年3月现场演出,听来却像是对商业妥协的一场反叛。

Classic American pop songs figure in the album, which also starts with an original composition by Jamal, “Ahmad’s Song.” Like many of the numbers here, it opens with a florid, rhapsodic piano introduction, before the drummer Frank Gant (with whom he’d been playing for a decade) and the bassist John Heard join in and kick things into high gear. What follows is an electrifying outburst of energy, as Jamal pushes the tempo, pulls it back to cascading cadenzas, tosses in quotes from other jazz and pop tunes, unleashes carillons of thunder. The second track, Antônio Carlos Jobim’s bossa-nova “Wave,” features a similarly dazzling virtuosic variety of phrases and riffs—a skipping and rocking eight-note motto that brings cheers from the audience, rapid two-handed chopping figures up the keyboard, crashing dissonances, swirl and bluster, lyrical whispers. Jamal’s exuberant solos give rise to a wondrous, paradoxical divergence: he flaunts a distinctive art of decomposition, breaking melodies down into small motifs that he both obsessively repeats and cleverly varies, yet he also keeps melody central, punctuating the improvisations with recognizable fragments of the basic tune, like signposts amid his free associations.

这张专辑收录了多首经典美国流行歌曲,开篇则是贾马尔原创的《艾哈迈德之歌》。与专辑中许多曲目相似,这首作品以华丽奔放的钢琴引子开场,随后合作十年的鼓手弗兰克·甘特与贝斯手约翰·赫德加入演奏,将乐曲推向高潮。当贾马尔提速疾驰,又猛然收束为倾泻而下的华彩乐段,时而穿插其他爵士与流行乐曲的旋律碎片,时而释放雷霆般的钟鸣和弦,迸发出令人震颤的能量狂潮。第二轨安东尼奥·卡洛斯·乔宾的波萨诺瓦名曲《浪涌》同样展现了令人目眩的炫技变奏——跳跃摇摆的八音符动机引发观众欢呼,双手在琴键上疾速劈斩,不协和音轰然碰撞,旋流与风暴交织间忽又化作抒情絮语。贾马尔蓬勃的即兴演绎催生出奇妙而矛盾的分裂感:他既炫耀着独特的解构艺术,将旋律拆解成执着重复又巧妙变奏的短小动机,却又始终坚守旋律的核心地位,在自由联想的迷宫中不时插回原曲的辨识片段,犹如散置的路标。

Fans of Jamal’s spare and firmly arranged recordings may struggle to recognize him in the teeming exuberance of this album. What unifies the two modes is the precision of Jamal’s discrete musical gestures, and his art of contrasts—how he moves in both periods, with jolting abruptness, from whispers to roars, from touches to torrents and back. If his early recordings isolate these gestures and surround them with musical space, separating the foreground of his piano from the background of his rhythm arrangements, the new recording brings background and foreground crashing together. To borrow an analogy from visual art, the finish of paint on the earlier recordings is thin, close to the canvas; here, it’s built up thickly. If there’s something Mondrian-like in his earlier, starker sense of musical geometry, at the Jazz Showcase he paints over the sharp lines with a van Gogh-esque impasto. In recent years, Feldman has put out three great albums of Jamal’s nineteen-sixties live recordings that chart the pianist’s transition to these more expansive styles. The new release marks the fullest flowering of them that I’ve heard.

贾马尔(Jamal)早期录音风格简约、编排严谨,其乐迷或许很难在这张新专辑的繁茂盛景中辨认出他的身影。将这两种模式统一起来的,是贾马尔那些离散音乐姿态的精准性,以及他的对比艺术——在两个时期,他如何以令人震撼的突兀感,从低语转向咆哮,从轻触转为洪流,再复归平静。如果说他早期的录音将这些姿态孤立起来,用音乐空间环绕它们,将其钢琴演奏的前景与节奏编排的背景分隔开来,那么新录音则让背景与前景猛烈地碰撞在一起。借用视觉艺术的类比,早期录音的颜料涂层很薄,贴近画布;而在这里,颜料被厚重地堆积起来。如果说他早期作品中那种更鲜明的音乐几何感带有某种蒙德里安式的气质,那么在《爵士秀场》专辑中,他则以梵高式的厚涂法覆盖了那些锐利的线条。近年来,费尔德曼(Feldman)已发行了三张贾马尔上世纪六十年代现场录音的杰出专辑,它们勾勒出这位钢琴家向这些更开阔风格转变的轨迹。而这张新专辑,标志着我所听闻的这种风格最绚烂的绽放。

Joe Henderson, “Consonance: Live at the Jazz Showcase”
Resonance Records

乔·亨德森(Joe Henderson),《和谐:爵士展示厅现场》(Consonance: Live at the Jazz Showcase),共振唱片(Resonance Records)

Henderson’s career launched later than Jamal’s but bore certain similarities. In the early sixties, Henderson, a tenor saxophonist, emerged as a modernist on the edges of mainstream jazz, where fervent but finger-snapping hard bop met the avant garde. He recorded with such illustrious musicians as Eric Dolphy, Andrew Hill, Woody Shaw, Lee Morgan, Horace Silver, Grant Green, and John Coltrane’s longtime bandmates McCoy Tyner and Elvin Jones. In the early seventies, Henderson released such tough-minded albums as “At the Lighthouse” and “In Japan” but also made commercially tinged, fusion-based recordings (such as “Black Narcissus” and “Canyon Lady”). At the time of the Chicago gig, in February, 1978, he hadn’t been in the studio as a bandleader in nearly three years.

亨德森的职业生涯起步比贾马尔晚,但两人有相似之处。六十年代初,这位次中音萨克斯手以现代主义者的姿态出现在主流爵士乐的边缘地带,那里既有热情洋溢、指响清脆的硬波普,也触及前卫音乐。他曾与埃里克·多尔菲、安德鲁·希尔、伍迪·肖、李·摩根、霍勒斯·西尔弗、格兰特·格林等杰出音乐家合作录音,也与约翰·科尔特兰的长期乐队伙伴麦考伊·泰纳和埃尔文·琼斯同台。七十年代初,亨德森发行了《在灯塔》和《在日本》这样风格硬朗的专辑,但也制作了带有商业色彩、融合爵士风格的唱片(如《黑色水仙》和《峡谷女郎》)。1978年2月芝加哥演出时,他已近三年未以乐队领队身份进过录音室。

Like just about every major tenor saxophonist of his generation, Henderson was influenced by Coltrane, but Henderson absorbed that influence and transformed it into a mark of his own originality. He took on essential elements of Coltrane’s sound—the long low-note honks and growls and high-pitched screeches and wails—and he was inspired by Coltrane’s vehemence, how his energies from deep within seemed to burst out with reckless, self-revealing fervor. Yet where Coltrane is a natural complexifier, piling chords on chords and notes on notes and creating colossal intricacies even within jaunty phrases, Henderson is a simplifier, planing the harmonic field in order to dash ahead all the more ebulliently. Coltrane builds vertically, layering and intertwining the music into elaborately interlocking spirals; Henderson hurls out details and dashes through them, creating sonic landscapes for his relentless improvisational travels.

与他那一代几乎所有重要的次中音萨克斯手一样,亨德森也受到科尔特兰的影响,但他将这种影响内化吸收,转化为自身独创性的印记。他继承了科尔特兰音色的核心要素——低沉的长音轰鸣与咆哮,高亢的尖啸与哀鸣——更从科尔特兰那种仿佛从灵魂深处迸发、带着不顾一切的自我袒露之激情的演奏方式中汲取力量。然而,科尔特兰天生是复杂化的巨匠,他在和弦上堆叠和弦,音符上叠加音符,即便在轻快的乐句中也能构筑出恢弘繁复的织体;亨德森却是简化者,他削平和声的疆域,只为更酣畅淋漓地向前奔涌。科尔特兰垂直建构音乐,层层叠叠交织出精密咬合的螺旋;亨德森则挥洒出细碎的星火,从中疾驰而过,为他不懈的即兴之旅开辟出辽阔的声音风景。

Notably, the first track on the new album, “Mr. P.C.,” is a Coltrane composition, an assertive romp that, a minute and a half in, already conjures a sense of having gone far fast. With buzzing and droning, wild high rasps and moans, fragmented and juddering phrases, roars and screams and split notes, beelike buzzing and hectic squalling, Henderson offers the sound-world of the avant-garde underpinned by songful riffs and a foot-stomping beat. At times, as in his solo on his own composition “Inner Urge,” these sound-shredding elements reach strident extremes untempered by thee rhythmic accompaniments of his bandmates—the pianist Joanne Brackeen, the bassist Steve Rodby, and the drummer Danny Spencer—who are keenly responsive partners in the high-spirited clamor.

值得注意的是,新专辑的第一首曲目《P.C.先生》是科尔特兰的原创作品,这首充满力量的欢快曲目在开场一分半钟内,便营造出疾驰远行的听觉意象。亨德森通过蜂鸣般的持续音、狂野的高音嘶鸣与呻吟、破碎震颤的乐句、咆哮尖叫与分裂音符、蜜蜂振翅般的嗡鸣与狂乱的嘶喊,构建出前卫主义的声景世界,其基底却是旋律性极强的即兴重复段与跺脚节拍。有时——比如在他原创曲目《内在冲动》的独奏段落中——这些音色撕裂元素会达到刺耳的极端,并未因乐队成员的节奏伴奏而缓和;钢琴手乔安妮·布雷肯、贝斯手史蒂夫·罗德比与鼓手丹尼·斯宾塞在这场激昂的喧腾中,始终是敏锐呼应的合奏者。

Henderson also offers one of the most beautiful and unusual renditions of the classic modernist ballad “ ’Round Midnight” that I’ve ever heard. It starts with his unaccompanied solo saxophone; then, joined by the rest of the quartet, he bumps the tempo up to a bouncy stride and offers solos with thrilling velocity and intensity to match. He ends another ballad, “Good Morning Heartache,” with another free and unaccompanied cadenza that dives into the wild zone, buzzing and yodeling. I’ve listened to many of Henderson’s albums from early in his career through the seventies, and long beyond. The new one is what I’d play for a Martian who wanted to know the power and the freedom of Henderson’s art.

亨德森还演绎了一版我所听过的最优美、最不寻常的经典现代主义民谣《午夜时分》。他以萨克斯管的无伴奏独奏开场;随后,在四重奏其他乐手的加入下,他将节奏提升至轻快的步幅,并以令人振奋的速度和强度呈现独奏。在另一首民谣《早安心痛》的结尾,他再次以一段自由的无伴奏华彩乐段收尾,跃入狂野之境,嗡鸣与约德尔唱法交织。我聆听过亨德森从早期至七十年代乃至更久远的许多专辑。这张新作,我会放给一位想了解亨德森艺术力量与自由的火星人听。

Cecil Taylor Unit, “Fragments: The Complete 1969 Salle Pleyel Concerts”
Elemental Music

塞西尔·泰勒乐队,《碎片:1969年普莱耶音乐厅音乐会全集》 Elemental Music

Taylor, of course, is one of the prime creators of so-called free jazz, a genre largely defined by atonality, collective improvisation, ferocious intensity, and the absence of a foot-tapping beat. But the idiom’s paradoxes—and its deep roots in classic jazz—are reflected in the title of his composition “Fragments of a Dedication to Duke Ellington,” which fills the entirety of this two-disk album. The recording, from Paris on November 3, 1969, is by a quartet featuring two of Taylor’s longtime collaborators, the drummer Andrew Cyrille (who’s still active and recording) and the alto saxophonist Jimmy Lyons, along with Sam Rivers—one of the prime free-jazz recording artists in his own right—on tenor and soprano saxes and flute. The group offers two separate performances of the same composition—one, from the afternoon set, and the other, from the evening. This is the first official release of the recordings, and hearing them is an ecstatic experience.

当然,泰勒是所谓自由爵士乐的主要开创者之一。这种音乐类型在很大程度上以无调性、集体即兴、激烈强度和缺乏可踏脚打拍子的节奏为特征。但这一音乐风格的悖论——及其在经典爵士乐中的深厚根源——都反映在他作品《献给艾灵顿公爵的片段》的标题中,这首曲子占据了这张双碟专辑的全部内容。这张1969年11月3日在巴黎录制的专辑,由泰勒的两位长期合作者——鼓手安德鲁·西里尔(至今仍活跃于乐坛并持续录音)和上低音萨克斯手吉米·莱昂斯——以及萨姆·里弗斯共同演绎。里弗斯本身也是自由爵士乐的重要录音艺术家之一,在专辑中演奏次中音和高音萨克斯管以及长笛。乐队对同一首作品进行了两场独立的演出——一场来自下午场,另一场来自晚场。这是这些录音的首次正式发行,聆听它们是一种令人狂喜的体验。

I’ve long thought of the great jazz musicians synesthetically, in terms of their implicit connections to other art forms. Taylor’s music has always struck me as bound with dance, for reasons that also help explain his deep connection to Ellington, beyond the similarities of their percussive piano styles and their efforts to create original group sounds. For much of Ellington’s career, his band was a dance band, playing in night clubs and at social gatherings which weren’t principally concerts, and his compositions and arrangements were designed to set people in motion. Taylor didn’t make his career playing for dancers (though he did, in 1990, accompany a choreographed dance performance), yet his music does much the same thing, in radically different ways that take a bit of teasing out. Taylor’s way of playing the piano evokes dance in its gestures, and he provokes the same effect from the entire group. At the keyboard, he doesn’t swing; he lurches and glides, leaps and thrusts and spins and jitters, unleashing torrents of notes at astounding speed, fragmenting his rhythms to their vanishing point. His free music manages to be intensely rhythmic nonethelesss, in a way that’s radically different from the familiar beats of foot-tapping jazz. His performances channel metabolic undulations, akin to breathing with the whole body, and they are liable to get even listeners in their seats, at home, moving along. By the end, a listener should feel not only exhilarated but also exhausted.

长久以来,我总以通感的方式看待伟大的爵士乐手,思考他们与其他艺术形式之间隐秘的关联。泰勒的音乐总让我联想到舞蹈——这不仅有助于解释他与埃林顿之间深刻的共鸣(超越两人相似的敲击式钢琴风格与创造独特乐队音色的追求),也揭示了其音乐内核的某种特质。埃林顿的乐队在其职业生涯的大部分时间里都是舞曲乐队,在夜总会和社交聚会上演奏,那些场合并非纯粹的音乐会;他的作曲与编曲旨在让人随之舞动。泰勒的职业生涯并非为舞者伴奏(尽管1990年他曾为编舞表演配乐),但他的音乐却以截然不同的方式达成了相似的效果,只是这种关联需要稍加梳理才能领会。泰勒的钢琴演奏方式通过肢体动作唤起舞蹈的意象,他也以这种方式激发整个乐队的共鸣。在琴键前,他不摇摆;他踉跄、滑行、腾跃、突进、旋转、震颤,以惊人的速度倾泻音符洪流,将节奏拆解至消逝的边缘。然而,他的自由爵士依然充满强烈的节奏感,只是这种节奏与那种令人脚趾打拍的熟悉爵士节拍截然不同。他的演出传递着新陈代谢般的律动,宛如用整个身体呼吸,甚至能让安坐家中的听众也不由自主随之摆动。一曲终了,听者不仅感到振奋,更会筋疲力尽。

My only complaint about the new album is that the two versions of “Fragments”are presented in reverse chronological order—starting with the evening set, which runs forty-nine minutes, and followed by the afternoon one, which is nearly twice as long. The shorter version, heard first on the first disk, feels rushed; though the musicians are all inspired, the results feel somewhat unvaried. In the longer one, the quartet’s members have more solos and develop a wider range of moods, revealing the great variety that emerges from their relatively homogeneous and immensely complex style. It’s a grand, rich, and mighty experience—and the shorter rendition suggests that the quartet knew that they couldn’t top it or match it in such short order.

我对这张新专辑唯一的抱怨是,《碎片》的两个版本采用了倒序排列——先是四十九分钟的晚间版,然后是时长近两倍的午后版。率先出现在第一张唱片里的短版显得仓促;尽管乐手们都很投入,但效果略显单一。而在长版中,四重奏成员有更多独奏段落,情绪层次也更丰富,展现出他们相对统一又极其复杂的风格中蕴藏的多样性。这是一次宏大、丰沛而震撼的体验——短版则暗示着四重奏明白,在如此有限的时间里他们无法超越或匹敌这个版本。

What the briefer version also lacks is the sense of stamina, of athleticism that’s at the heart of Taylor’s music. He was lean and in shape, as the album’s booklet and cover photos attest, and he remained so throughout his career. (I saw him, when he was nearing eighty, play with whirlwind thunder for an hour and a half, without interruption, amid the holy racket of his fifteen-to-twenty-piece big band.) Taylor’s music has a heroic, monumental sense of time; it occupies time the way that a staged spectacle occupies space, and, as a result, the forty-nine-minute evening set of “Fragments” seems slight, whereas the hour-and-a-half-plus version, for all its mind-wrenching and body-seizing intensity, fits properly in its dimensions. Taylor, who’d already made eleven studio albums, starting in 1956, hadn’t recorded any since October, 1966. As great as many of them are– notably, the last of that group, “Conquistador!”—this Paris concert is the earliest recording yet released to reveal the vast scope of his ambitions. ♦

精简版还缺失了泰勒音乐的核心特质——那种持久的耐力与竞技般的活力。从专辑内页和封面照片可以看出,他身形精瘦、体态健美,这种状态贯穿了他的整个职业生涯。(我曾亲眼目睹,年近八旬的他在十五到二十人编制的大乐队制造的圣洁喧嚣中,以旋风惊雷之势连续演奏了一个半小时。)泰勒的音乐具有一种英雄史诗般的时间感;它占据时间的方式,犹如舞台奇观占据空间。正因如此,《碎片》中四十九分钟的晚间演出片段显得单薄,而超过一个半小时的完整版本,尽管充满令人心神震颤、身体紧绷的强度,却恰如其分地展现了应有的格局。自1956年起已发行十一张录音室专辑的泰勒,自1966年10月以来再未进过录音棚。尽管此前那些专辑中不乏杰作——尤其是该阶段的最后一张《征服者!》——但这场巴黎音乐会作为已发布的最早录音,首次揭示了他宏阔的艺术野心。♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month