The Current Cinema

The Calculated Uplift of “I Swear”

“我发誓”背后的精心算计
Kirk Jones’s bio-pic of the activist John Davidson, who has worked to destigmatize Tourette’s syndrome, is effective as an educational tool but mechanical as a drama.
柯克·琼斯(Kirk Jones)为活动家约翰·戴维森(John Davidson)拍摄的传记片,在消除人们对图雷特综合征的污名化方面颇有助益,但作为一部剧情片却显得刻板生硬。
April 17, 2026
A man covering his mouth
Illustration by Anuj Shrestha

Like many upbeat biographical dramas, “I Swear” begins at the end. A culminating moment of triumph is neatly reverse engineered into a prologue: it’s 2019, and the Scottish activist John Davidson (Robert Aramayo) is being honored for his groundbreaking work to raise awareness of Tourette’s syndrome. John is nervous, for good reason. He has severe coprolalia, a symptom of Tourette’s that causes him to blurt out obscenities unpredictably—all in all, not an ideal situation for a man about to meet Queen Elizabeth II. Sure enough, John causes a scene, yelling, “Fuck the Queen!” Once the initial shock in the room has subsided—the Queen herself seems unperturbed—John says, “Sorry, Ma’am,” and quietly finds his seat. The ceremony begins, and the message is clear: if Her Majesty could take such an indignity in stride, what’s the rest of the world’s excuse?

与许多励志传记片一样,《我发誓》(I Swear)从结局开始。影片将胜利的高潮时刻巧妙地倒叙为序幕:2019年,苏格兰活动家约翰·戴维森(John Davidson,罗伯特·阿拉马约饰)因在提高公众对图雷特综合征(Tourette's syndrome)认知方面的开创性工作而获表彰。约翰的紧张情有可原——他患有严重的秽语症(coprolalia),这是图雷特综合征的症状之一,会让他不受控制地突然爆出污言秽语。总而言之,对于一个即将面见伊丽莎白二世女王的人来说,这绝非理想状况。果不其然,约翰引发了一场骚动,高喊"去他X的女王!"当现场的初次震惊平息后——女王本人似乎并未动怒——约翰说了句"抱歉,陛下",便安静地落座。仪式开始,影片的讯息不言而喻:若女王陛下都能从容承受这般冒犯,世人还有什么借口呢?

It’s an amusing point of entry, although, as a scene of comic vindication, it arguably renders the movie moot. Here is Davidson in a foul-mouthed nutshell: sincere, self-effacing, and prone to embarrassing exclamations that—even after years of anguished personal struggle and laudable public advocacy—he remains powerless to prevent. The film’s title, an obvious reference to profanity, also alludes to an incident dramatized later on, when John, on trial after inadvertently triggering a pub brawl, must give sworn testimony in court. (He can’t get through the oath without calling the judge a cunt—an assessment as unintentional as it is hilariously spot-on.) What’s a man to do when, in striving to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, his best-faith efforts are mistaken for the opposite?

这倒是个有趣的切入点,尽管作为喜剧式的辩白场景,它或许让整部电影显得多余。戴维森的形象在粗口的外壳下展露无遗:真诚、谦逊,却总忍不住冒出令人尴尬的惊呼——即便历经多年痛苦的个人挣扎和值得称道的公开倡导,他依然无力控制。片名直指脏话,同时也暗指后续戏剧化呈现的事件:约翰因无意引发酒吧斗殴受审时,必须在法庭上宣誓作证。(他连宣誓词都念不完就脱口骂法官"贱人"——这句评价虽非本意,却精准得令人捧腹。)当一个人竭力陈述全部真相时,最真诚的努力反被误解为相反之意,他又能如何?

“I Swear” serves up an ingratiating answer to that question. It was written and directed by the British filmmaker Kirk Jones, a reliable purveyor of uplift; only in comparison with his earlier work, which includes “Waking Ned Devine” (1998), “Nanny McPhee” (2006), and “My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2” (2016), could his new movie be construed as remotely hard-hitting. With its mostly happy ending established, it flashes back to 1983, when the teen-age John (played movingly by Scott Ellis Watson), who lives with his parents and siblings in the Scottish town of Galashiels, begins to experience his first Tourette’s symptoms. His physical tics derail a promising football career, and his verbal eruptions frequently land him in trouble at school, where neither his peers nor his headmaster grasp that he has no control over his offending words and deeds. Even a deeper knowledge of Tourette’s is not a guarantee of understanding. When John begins spitting out his food, his mother, Heather (Shirley Henderson), worn down by exhaustion and anger, banishes him from the dinner table—the first in an unceasing series of maternal rejections. (His father’s rejection is more final; he abandons the family not long after John’s condition worsens.) Years later, only John (now played by Aramayo) remains with Heather at home, medicated into semi-submission, with little hope of a life of independence or fulfillment.

《我发誓》对这个问题给出了讨巧的答案。这部影片由英国电影人柯克·琼斯编剧并执导,他向来擅长制作励志作品;只有与他之前的作品相比——包括《与墨索里尼喝茶》(1999年)、《魔法保姆麦克菲》(2006年)和《我盛大的希腊婚礼2》(2016年)——这部新作才能被解读为有那么一点尖锐。影片先交代了基本圆满的结局,然后闪回到1983年:少年约翰(斯科特·埃利斯·沃森动人地饰演)与父母和兄弟姐妹住在苏格兰小镇加拉希尔斯,开始出现最初的图雷特综合征症状。身体的抽搐使他原本前途光明的足球生涯戛然而止,言语的爆发又常常让他在学校惹上麻烦——无论是同学还是校长,都不明白他无法控制自己冒犯性的言行。即使对图雷特综合征有更深的了解,也未必能保证理解。当约翰开始喷吐食物时,母亲希瑟(雪莉·亨德森饰)被疲惫和愤怒压垮,将他赶下餐桌——这是母亲一系列持续不断的拒绝中的第一次。(父亲的拒绝则更为彻底;在约翰病情恶化后不久,他便抛弃了家庭。)多年后,只有约翰(现由阿拉马约饰演)仍与希瑟住在家中,靠药物勉强维持半顺从状态,对独立或充实的生活几乎不抱希望。

John Davidson’s story has been told in several TV documentaries over the past few decades, starting with a 1988 episode of the BBC series “Q.E.D.,” titled “John’s Not Mad,” which has been credited with doing much to educate the British public about Tourette’s. (Oliver Sacks, one of the episode’s prominent voices, offers a precise, sympathetic analysis of John’s symptoms.) Perhaps because it focussed on John’s teen-age years, when Tourette’s treatments and therapies were fewer and farther between, the documentary took a more downbeat view of its subject and his prospects than the movie does. In “I Swear,” John’s social rehabilitation is set in motion by Dottie Achenbach (Maxine Peake), the mother of an old school friend, who takes John under her wing. In relatively short order, she moves John into her house, gets him off his meds, and encourages him to apply for a job at a local community center, where his boss, Tommy Trotter (Peter Mullan), proves as saintly as Dottie is. It’s Tommy who nudges John toward the realization that the problem lies not with his condition but with society’s ignorance of it. A public-awareness campaign is launched, with John heroically leading the way.

约翰·戴维森的故事在过去几十年里被多部电视纪录片讲述过,最早是1988年英国广播公司系列节目《Q.E.D.》中名为《约翰不是疯子》的一集,该片被认为极大地帮助英国公众了解了图雷特综合征。片中权威声音之一奥利弗·萨克斯对约翰的症状进行了精准而富有同理心的分析。或许由于纪录片聚焦于约翰的少年时期——当时图雷特综合征的治疗手段稀缺——它对主人公及其前景的看法比电影更为悲观。在《我发誓》中,约翰的社会康复始于老同学的母亲多蒂·阿亨巴赫(马克辛·皮克饰),她将约翰纳入羽翼之下。在较短时间内,她让约翰搬进自己家,帮他戒断药物,并鼓励他去当地社区中心求职。那里的老板汤米·特罗特(彼得·穆兰饰)展现出与多蒂同样圣洁的品格,正是汤米引导约翰意识到问题不在于他的病症,而在于社会对此的无知。一场公众意识倡导活动由此展开,约翰英勇地走在最前列。

“I Swear,” then, isn’t just an account of Davidson’s life. It’s a direct extension of his activism, and its effectiveness as an educational tool is what renders it frictionless and predictable as a drama. In the course of the narrative, as John is embraced by friends and assaulted by strangers, Jones’s storytelling veers between breakthroughs and setbacks with a rhythm so mechanical as to verge on metronomic. Yet the movie is a slick and expertly calculated piece of work, and it has taken even the most reflexive skepticism into account; you may emerge from the theatre blinking back tears and rolling your eyes. The only remotely complicated figure is his mother, Heather—a would-be villain in the logic of the film, made more complex and tragic by Henderson, who has a gift for gloomy nuance. Strikingly, in “John’s Not Mad,” the real-life Heather came across as entirely devoted and sympathetic. You needn’t be a bio-pic truth fetishist to wonder how close to reality Jones’s treatment gets—and how much may have been artificially sweetened, or embittered, for effect.

《我发誓》不仅是大卫森的人生记录,更是他社会行动的直接延伸。作为教育工具的有效性,使其作为戏剧作品显得流畅而可预测。随着约翰在叙事中被朋友接纳、被陌生人攻击,琼斯的叙事节奏在突破与挫折间摇摆,机械得近乎节拍器般精准。然而这部影片是部制作精良、精心算计的作品,甚至预判了最本能的质疑——你可能在走出影院时既强忍泪水又忍不住翻白眼。片中唯一稍显复杂的角色是他的母亲希瑟,按照影片逻辑本该是个反派,却在亨德森演绎下变得复杂而悲情,这位演员擅长表现阴郁的微妙层次。耐人寻味的是,在纪录片《约翰没疯》里,现实中的希瑟显得全心奉献且令人同情。即便不是传记片真实性原教旨主义者,人们也不禁要问:琼斯的处理究竟有多贴近现实?又有多少是为了戏剧效果而人为增甜或加苦?

Aramayo’s role raises other questions. Some people may have strong feelings about the ethics of an actor who does not have Tourette’s performing the tics and gestures that accompany the condition; as it happens, I was disarmed by the friendly jut of Aramayo’s smile and the gentle clownery of his carriage. He strides through the movie with a startling mix of awkwardness and grace: the light-footed assurance of someone who has learned to anticipate—and perhaps overcorrect for—errant movements.

阿拉马约的出演也引发了其他问题。有人或许会对一位没有妥瑞氏症的演员演绎该病症伴随的抽搐和动作产生强烈的道德质疑;但事实上,我被阿拉马约友善的咧嘴笑容和略带笨拙的温和仪态所打动。他在影片中行走的姿态糅合了惊人的笨拙与优雅:那种轻快的从容属于早已学会预判——或许还过度矫正了——异常肢体动作的人。

For me, the possible false note lay not in Aramayo’s performance but in the script. At times, it seems that Jones’s film, far from being strictly diagnostic, might in fact be egging John on, for the sake of our entertainment, toward perverse new heights of verbal invention. After brewing a cup of tea for Tommy, John blurts out, “I use spunk for milk”—and spunk, more in the spiritual than the bodily sense, is what the movie has in spades. Its humor is so insistent that it’s almost unseemly, transforming “I Swear” into a curious kind of misfired-synapses comedy—one that, in tone and intent, seems to fly in the face of the sombre warning issued by the 1988 documentary: “John’s obscenities will always be a verbal time bomb, waiting to go off in public.”

在我看来,可能的不和谐音符并非来自阿拉马约的表演,而在于剧本。有时,琼斯的电影似乎远非严格诊断性的,反而可能为了娱乐观众,怂恿约翰在言语创造上走向反常的新高度。为汤米泡好茶后,约翰脱口而出:"我用精液当牛奶"——而这部电影真正充沛的,正是这种精神层面而非肉体意义上的"勇气"。其幽默如此执着,几乎到了不合时宜的地步,将《我发誓》变成了一种奇特的突触错位喜剧——无论是基调还是意图,似乎都与1988年纪录片发出的严肃警告背道而驰:"约翰的污言秽语永远是颗言语定时炸弹,随时可能在公众场合引爆。"

That grim prophecy was fulfilled—and how—on February 22nd, at the BAFTAs, where “I Swear” experienced a one-of-a-kind commingling of glory and disaster. To the shock of many, Aramayo won Best Actor, triumphing over a field that included the Oscar nominees Timothée Chalamet, Leonardo DiCaprio, Ethan Hawke, and Michael B. Jordan. Davidson was in the crowd, too, as the audience had been informed, with an announcement that any outbursts they might hear from him were involuntary and not representative of his views or beliefs. The warning proved scant consolation when Davidson shouted a racial slur at two Black actors—Jordan and Delroy Lindo, both from “Sinners”—who were presenting an award onstage. The BBC inexplicably neglected to excise the incident from its tape-delayed broadcast of the ceremony, and, amid the ugly fallout, much was written about the failures of the network and of BAFTA in their duty of care to all involved. More divisive has been the question of who, in the end, was the more aggrieved party: Jordan and Lindo, who were subjected to unconscionable humiliation, or Davidson, who was accused of racism online by countless individuals with no understanding of or empathy for his condition.

那个不祥的预言在2月22日的英国电影学院奖颁奖礼上应验了——而且是以何等戏剧性的方式。《我发誓》这部电影经历了一场荣耀与灾难交织的独特时刻。令许多人震惊的是,阿拉马约击败了包括奥斯卡提名者提莫西·查拉梅、莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥、伊桑·霍克和迈克尔·B·乔丹在内的强劲对手,斩获最佳男主角奖。戴维森也在现场——主办方已提前告知观众,若听到他发出任何叫喊皆属无意识行为,不代表其观点或信仰。然而当戴维森对台上颁奖的两位黑人演员——皆来自《罪人》剧组的乔丹与德尔罗伊·林多——吼出种族歧视秽语时,这番警告显得苍白无力。英国广播公司竟 inexplicably 未将这段插曲从延时播出的典礼录像中剪除,在随之而来的舆论风暴中,媒体纷纷指责该电视台与英国电影学院未尽到对相关人员的保护责任。更具争议的是:究竟谁才是更大的受害者?是遭受难以容忍之羞辱的乔丹与林多,还是在网络上被无数不理解其病情、缺乏共情的人们斥为种族主义者的戴维森?

What makes the episode worth considering anew, as “I Swear” arrives in American theatres this month, is how it seemed to both destroy and affirm the film in one nightmarish breath—to expose the hollowness of its feel-good machinery while also proving its larger point about the vindictive ignorance of so much of the public. There’s a particularly hideous irony in the fact that “I Swear,” which depicts a fictional Davidson prevailing through some of his gravest anxieties, wound up thrusting the real Davidson into the most public embarrassment of his life. What horror! But also, for sheer educational and entertainment value, what an opportunity. Had the filmmakers been inclined to tweak their work at the last minute, they might have reshot their prologue, guerrilla-style, ahead of the film’s U.S. release. Who needs a mild anti-monarchist outburst, given the far thornier international debacle on the BAFTAs stage? Fuck the Queen, indeed. ♦

随着《我发誓》本月在美国上映,这起事件值得重新审视,因为它似乎在一场噩梦般的喘息之间,既摧毁了这部电影,又肯定了它——既暴露了其温情励志机制的虚伪空洞,同时也证明了影片关于公众报复性无知的更大论点。尤其令人毛骨悚然的讽刺在于,《我发誓》描绘了一个虚构的戴维森如何克服内心最深重的焦虑,结果却将真实的戴维森推向了人生中最公开的窘境。多么恐怖!但就纯粹的教育和娱乐价值而言,这又是多么难得的机会。倘若制片方愿意在最后一刻修改作品,他们本可以在美国上映前以游击风格重拍序幕。既然英国电影学院奖舞台上已上演了远比这棘手的国际闹剧,谁还需要温和的反君主制爆发呢?去他妈的英国女王,确实如此。♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month