Gift Guides

The Best Gifts for Kids Are Small. Or Big. Or Lots. Or Stomp

给孩子最好的礼物,可以很小。或者很大。或者很多。或者用脚踩。
No one cares as much about presents as children do. No pressure!
没有人比孩子更在乎礼物。别有压力!
Animation of a child riding a bike
Illustration by Miguel Porlan

When you are a kid, time can seem to organize itself around occasions for receiving treats—and, above all, presents. This is not because children are materialistic monsters (mostly) but because they have a limited ability to treat themselves. Generally speaking, an eight-year-old cannot reward herself, at the end of a tough week, by doing a little window-shopping and deciding that she deserves a cute bag, or its third-grade equivalent (glowing slime?). The calendar can become a series of buildups and letdowns around the prospect of surprise delights. This is the golden age of gift-getting. No one cares as much about presents as kids do. No pressure!

当你是个孩子的时候,时间似乎是围绕着收好东西的场合来组织的——尤其是礼物。这并不是因为孩子是物质主义的小怪物(大多数情况下不是),而是因为他们犒劳自己的能力有限。一般来说,一个八岁的孩子没法在辛苦一周之后,通过随便逛逛橱窗、然后决定自己配得上一个可爱的包包(或者三年级版本的等价物——发光史莱姆?)来奖励自己。日历可以变成围绕惊喜快乐的一连串期待与失落。这是收礼物的黄金时代。没有人比孩子更在乎礼物。别有压力!

Fortunately, choosing a gift for a child comes with fewer shades of social nuance than picking something for an adult. The goal is pure pleasure, not a statement or message; the worst-case scenario is indifference or mild disappointment—not, say, horror at your fundamental misunderstanding of a long-standing personal relationship. You are going for FUN. Think about the experience of seeing the present and opening the present, and about whom the present is actually going to please.

幸运的是,给孩子挑礼物比给大人挑礼物少了很多社交上的微妙考量。目标是纯粹的快乐,不是某种表态或信息;最坏的情况不过是无动于衷或轻微失望——而不是,比如说,对方因你从根本上误解了一段长期私人关系而感到惊骇。你要追求的是“好玩”。想想看到礼物和拆开礼物的体验,再想想这份礼物真正取悦的是谁。

Gifts “for” Babies

“给”婴儿的礼物

If you are buying a present for a person who lacks object permanence, that present is for their parents. Shop with this fact in mind. Clothes are an excellent gift, in a way that they won’t be again until the child’s adolescence—here is your chance to jazz up the Center of the Universe. Buy something that’s more expensive than anyone thinking about the cost of child care could justify buying themselves, but that’s still functional enough for everyday use. No to tiny buttons, the color white, and lace; yes to $64 balloon pants. Yes to leopard-print anything. (It’ll hide stains!) Yes to seasonally appropriate comical hats ($55-$99).

如果你要给一个还没有客体永久性概念的人买礼物,那这份礼物其实是给父母的。带着这个事实去选购。衣服是极好的礼物,好到孩子进入青春期之前都不会再有这种效果——这是你给“宇宙中心”添点花样的机会。买一件任何考虑托儿费用的人都舍不得给自己买、但仍然足够实用可以日常穿的东西。不要小纽扣、白色和蕾丝;要六十四美元的灯笼裤。要任何豹纹单品。(能遮污渍!)要应季的搞笑帽子(五十五到九十九美元)。

Parents spend a lot of time gazing upon their babies (how would the Center of the Universe look in pink sunglasses?), and they also spend a lot of time reading to their babies, at least if they are overachieving millennials who have imbibed the requisite parenting expertise. It is important that they have books to read aloud that are not bad. My husband, a bookseller, often notes that most books are bad, and this may be doubly true for children’s books, whose brevity leads foolhardy would-be authors to underestimate the difficulty of their task. Before you give a children’s book, think: Is this book fun to read aloud? Will it be fun to read aloud twelve million times? Rhythm counts for everything, subject matter for almost nothing. Babies do not care about “art” or “science,” and you can’t make them. What you’re after here is fluid prose and pictures that contain lots of interesting items to identify and talk about. There’s a reason everyone already has “Goodnight Moon.” Instead, consider “The House in the Night,” by Susan Marie Swanson, or “All the World,” by Liz Garton Scanlon, both sold in chompable board-book editions. Richard Scarry’s “I Am a Bunny,” though not explicitly bedtime-oriented, is another durable hit. (If you want to give a new parent something to read to themselves, consider “And Now We Have Everything,” by Meaghan O’Connell, a funny and unsparing account of parenthood’s earliest days.) ($9-$40)

父母花大量时间凝视自己的宝宝(宇宙中心戴上粉色太阳镜会是什么样?),也花大量时间给宝宝读书——至少如果他们是吸收了必备育儿知识的、追求卓越的千禧一代的话。重要的是,他们要有一些读起来不糟糕的书可以朗读。我丈夫是书商,他常说大多数书都很糟糕,而童书可能更是如此,因为篇幅短小让鲁莽的准作者低估了任务的难度。在送一本童书之前,想一想:这本书朗读起来有趣吗?读上一千二百万遍还会有趣吗?节奏决定一切,题材几乎无关紧要。婴儿不在乎“艺术”或“科学”,你也无法让他们在乎。你要找的是流畅的文字,以及包含大量有趣物品可供辨认和讨论的图画。《晚安,月亮》人手一本是有原因的。不妨考虑苏珊·玛丽·斯旺森(Susan Marie Swanson)的《夜之屋》,或者利兹·加顿·斯坎伦(Liz Garton Scanlon)的《全世界》,两者都有可以啃咬的硬纸板书版本。理查德·斯凯瑞(Richard Scarry)的《我是一只兔子》虽然并非明确的睡前主题,但也是经久不衰的热门。(如果你想送新手父母一本给自己读的书,可以考虑梅根·奥康奈尔(Meaghan O’Connell)的《现在我们拥有了一切》,一本关于育儿最初时光的幽默而毫不留情的记述。)(九到四十美元)

As for toys: true infants are scarcely capable of “play” in any sense that requires accessories or equipment; they’re still realizing that they have hands. Something with fabric that produces a crinkly sound ($10) when pawed inexpertly is pretty much the upper limit of possibility.

至于玩具:真正的婴儿几乎谈不上任何需要配件或设备的“玩耍”;他们还在意识到自己有手这件事。一块能发出窸窣声的布料(十美元),被笨拙地扒拉时沙沙作响,基本上就是可能性的上限了。

The Charm of Lots

“多”的魅力

Not long ago, my husband and I asked our three-and-a-half-year-old what we should get his grandfather as an eightieth-birthday present. “Cars and cars and cars and cars and cars,” he replied. It was an instructive answer: the sorts of gifts that people imagine giving others are a good indication of the gifts that they themselves enjoy receiving. In general, I’m all for quality, but when attempting to please a small child there’s something to be said for quantity. Sheer, dazzling quantity: cars and cars and cars and cars and cars ($7-$30). Present them loose in a bag or in a box; remember that it’s always nice to have spares to lose, or for a visitor to take home.

不久前,我和丈夫问我们三岁半的儿子,该给爷爷买什么八十岁生日礼物。“车车车车车,”他回答。这是一个很有启发性的答案:人们想象中送给别人的礼物,往往很好地反映了他们自己喜欢收到的礼物。总的来说,我完全赞成重质,但在取悦一个小孩的时候,数量也有它的道理。纯粹的、令人眼花缭乱的数量:车车车车车(七到三十美元)。把它们散装在一个袋子或盒子里送出去;记住,有备用的可以弄丢、或者让来访的小朋友带回家,总是件好事。

By a similar token, stickers and stickers and stickers and stickers and stickers ($9-$31). The recipient can stick them on a giant roll of paper ($33) (how giant? That’s up to you), taped out on the floor. The effect is something like an off-season approximation of a sidewalk, and, your winter climate permitting, sidewalk chalk (tons of it, for $18) is another good option. And books are not excluded from the thrill of scale. Richard Scarry’s “Biggest Word Book Ever!” ($45)—about twenty-four by thirty-two inches when wide open—is irresistibly grand, full of many quintessentially busy Scarry characters, and large enough for a small reader to literally climb inside.

同理,贴纸贴纸贴纸贴纸贴纸(九到三十一美元)。收礼人可以把它贴在一大卷纸上(三十三美元)(多大?随你),用胶带铺在地板上。效果有点像反季节的人行道替代品,而且如果你的冬季气候允许,人行道粉笔(一大堆,十八美元)是另一个好选择。书也不例外,同样可以享受规模的震撼。理查德·斯凯瑞的《有史以来最大的单词书!》(四十五美元)——完全摊开时约二十四乘三十二英寸——大得令人无法抗拒,里面满是许多典型忙碌的斯凯瑞式角色,大到一个小读者可以真的爬进去。

The Charm of Little

“小”的魅力

The appeal of something to climb inside is a valuable reminder of another language that kid gifts can speak: the charm of little. It can be fun to be small and to feel small, and this is why it is nice to build forts. Technically, doing so only requires a blanket, but you don’t need a gift guide to direct you to your linen closet. Expand your household’s fort horizons with the Nugget ($249-$299), a “play couch” made of sturdy, rearrangeable cushions that can be used to construct cozy reading corners and nooks for playing pretend. (A chair called the Smore, at $199-$239, from the same company, offers a similar concept, with a smaller footprint.)

能爬进去的东西的吸引力,是一个宝贵的提醒,提醒我们儿童礼物还能说另一种语言:小的魅力。小小的、感觉自己小小的,可以很有趣,这就是为什么搭堡垒很好玩。严格来说,搭堡垒只需要一条毯子,但你不需要礼物指南来指引你去翻自家壁橱。用Nugget(二百四十九到二百九十九美元)来拓展你家的堡垒视野吧,这是一张“游戏沙发”,由坚固、可重新排列的垫子组成,可以用来搭建舒适的阅读角落和玩过家家的隐蔽小窝。(同一家公司有一款叫Smore的椅子,一百九十九到二百三十九美元,概念类似,占地面积更小。)

It is also fun simply to think about small things. And so, to stock the fort’s library: the author and illustrator Phoebe Wahl produces books full of magical tiny beings, stories that are beautiful and sweet without being precious or twee. “Little Witch Hazel: A Year in the Forest” ($20) collects four stories—one for each season—about a witch who lives in a mossy stump and is small enough to ride on the back of an owl. Her friends and neighbors include the Mole Sisters, Mousepappa, and a frog named Wendell (who might plausibly have been named for Wendell Berry). Wahl’s “Backyard Fairies” ($19) depicts a kid who is sure that there are fairies just out of sight, in the woods behind her house, and tries to find them. For children inclined to such expeditions—or who just want to read in a dark spot—a camping headlamp ($35) makes an inexhaustibly useful accessory.

单纯地思考小东西也很有趣。所以,为了充实堡垒的藏书:作家兼插画家菲比·沃尔(Phoebe Wahl)创作的书里充满了神奇的小小生灵,故事美丽而甜美,却不矫揉造作。《小女巫黑兹尔:森林里的一年》(二十美元)收录了四个故事——每个季节一个——讲述一个住在长满苔藓的树桩里、小到可以骑在猫头鹰背上的女巫。她的朋友和邻居包括鼹鼠姐妹、鼠爸爸,还有一只名叫温德尔(Wendell)的青蛙(这个名字很可能是以温德尔·贝里命名的)。沃尔的《后院仙子》(十九美元)描绘了一个孩子,她确信在她家后面的树林里、就在视线之外的地方有仙子,于是试图找到她们。对于喜欢这种探险的孩子——或者只是想在黑暗的角落里看书的孩子——一个露营头灯(三十五美元)是一件用之不竭的实用配件。

Everything Changes

一切都在变

Becoming a parent, and shopping for a child, is a constant reminder that everything and nothing changes. I can easily recall the joy of forts; I would have loved “Backyard Fairies.” Yet certain stalwart kid pleasures have been reimagined in the intervening decades. Take training wheels and tricycles: they’re out. Now children have balance bikes, which are two-wheelers without pedals—an arrangement that supposedly makes for an easier transition to riding the real thing. Based on the anecdotal evidence of my local playground, I’m convinced. The little guys get good at gliding, fast. These new versions of that classic Big Present, a bike, can be procured from such manufacturers as Guardian ($149) and Woom ($249) (branding keyed to a target market of anxious parents).

成为父母、为孩子购物,不断提醒你一切都在变,又什么都没变。我依然能轻易回忆起搭堡垒的快乐;我小时候一定会喜欢《后院仙子》。然而,某些经典的儿童乐趣在过去的几十年里被重新构想了。比如辅助轮和三轮车:它们过时了。现在的孩子骑平衡车,这是一种没有脚踏的两轮车——据说这种设计能让过渡到骑真正的自行车更容易。根据我所在社区游乐场的轶事证据,我信了。小家伙们很快就能滑行得很好,速度飞快。这种经典大礼——自行车——的新版本可以从Guardian(一百四十九美元)和Woom(二百四十九美元)等制造商那里买到(品牌定位瞄准的是焦虑的父母这一目标市场)。

Even crayon technology has somehow improved in the years since I was coloring. Have you tried gel crayons ($20)? Instead of hard and waxy, they’re as soft as oil pastels, but miraculously smudge-proof once dry, with colors bright and opaque enough to draw on dark construction paper. And, for kids approaching the age of phones, Tin Can ($100) has given the humble landline a contemporary reinvention: it permits calls to preselected phone numbers using home Wi-Fi, and has (yes) a cord.

就连蜡笔技术在我涂涂画画的那些年里也莫名其妙地进步了。你试过凝胶蜡笔(二十美元)吗?它们不像传统蜡笔那样又硬又蜡质,而是像油画棒一样柔软,但神奇的是干了之后不会蹭花,颜色鲜艳且不透明,足以在深色卡纸上作画。而且,对于接近拥有手机年龄的孩子来说,Tin Can(一百美元)给不起眼的座机带来了当代的重新发明:它可以用家庭Wi-Fi拨打预设的电话号码,而且(没错)有一根电话线。

Three, Two, One

三、二、一

Eight-Pack of Soft Rockets

八枚装软火箭

Stomp Rocket

踩踏火箭

When I set out to make a list of gifts for kids, there was only one thing I was sure I wanted to include. If you take nothing else from this guide, know this: a Stomp Rocket ($30) is the perfect present.

当我着手列一份儿童礼物清单时,只有一样东西是我确定一定要收录的。如果你从这份指南中什么也没记住,请记住这一点:踩踏火箭(三十美元)是完美的礼物。

One kid can have fun with a Stomp Rocket; two kids can execute some impressive teamwork; three or four kids can share effortlessly. The learning curve is nonexistent. The payoff is immediate. The only way to improve it is to buy extra rockets ($10), which you should do. (And do not go off-brand with these—you want genuine Stomp product. Amazon imitations can get stuck on the launch tube, an unacceptable defect, and one that I discovered the hard way.) I have never seen a group of children get bored of a Stomp Rocket. I have seen a group of adults sipping early-evening drinks on a patio, idly Stomping and chatting, enjoying the beginning of a spring thaw and the return of sunlight. ♦

一个孩子可以玩踩踏火箭玩得很开心;两个孩子可以完成令人印象深刻的团队合作;三四个孩子可以毫不费力地分享。学习曲线为零。回报立竿见影。唯一能改进它的方法就是买额外的火箭(十美元),你应该买。(而且不要买杂牌——你要的是正品Stomp产品。亚马逊上的仿制品可能会卡在发射管上,这是一个不可接受的缺陷,也是我亲身经历才发现的。)我从未见过一群孩子对踩踏火箭感到厌倦。我见过一群成年人在露台上啜饮傍晚时分的饮品,悠闲地踩一踩、聊一聊,享受着初春解冻和阳光的回归。♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month