Books

A Dying Poet’s Farewell to the World

一位垂死诗人对世界的告别
In his final days, Franz Wright tapped into a rich vein of material, recording dark, beautiful, and self-deprecating poems on tape and in scribbles all over his apartment.
在生命最后的日子里,弗朗茨·赖特(Franz Wright)触及了一片丰饶的素材矿脉,用录音带和散落公寓各处的潦草字迹,记录下黑暗、优美而自嘲的诗篇。
Portrait of Franz Wright.
Illustration by Christoph Niemann; Source photograph by Elizabeth Oehlkers Wright

Writing poetry made the late Franz Wright miserable, but it was an improvement on just about everything else in his life. His mentor in this essentially comic predicament was his estranged father, the poet James Wright. When Franz was fifteen, he sent his dad a seven-line poem. The elder Wright’s response soon arrived from New York City, addressed jauntily from one “good craftsman” to another: “Franz, I am non-plussed,” the younger Wright recalled, in a poem. “I’ll be damned. You can write. What can I say? Welcome to Hell.”

写诗让已故的弗朗茨·赖特痛苦不堪,但这已经比他生命中几乎其他所有事都要好得多了。他这种本质上是喜剧性的困境,其导师正是与他关系疏远的父亲——诗人詹姆斯·赖特(James Wright)。弗朗茨十五岁时,给父亲寄去了一首七行诗。老赖特的回信很快从纽约寄到,语气轻快地以一位“好工匠”对另一位“好工匠”的口吻写道:“弗朗茨,我懵了,”小赖特在一首诗里回忆道,“我真服了。你居然会写诗。我能说什么呢?欢迎来到地狱。”

It was the only home they shared, and Wright took advantage of his father’s hospitality. In fourteen volumes of poems, including “Walking to Martha’s Vineyard,” which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2004, Franz Wright made Hell habitable, almost cheerful. “Axe in Blossom: Last Poems & Fragments” (Knopf), assembled by the poet’s widow, Elizabeth Oehlkers Wright, after his death, in 2015, collects work from the days when Wright was maintaining what John Keats called a “posthumous existence”; dying from lung cancer, he dictated some of these tender, hardboiled, and wisecracking poems into a tape recorder, too weak to write, or left them as voice-mail messages for friends in an “odd-sounding croak that was once a good voice.” Photos taken at Wright’s apartment after his death show lines of verse written on the walls, on the appliances, on coffee filters, and, the most Boston thing evah, carved with a ballpoint into a Styrofoam Dunkin’ Donuts cup. It looks like a crime scene, if writing poetry were a crime. “I feel like Philip Marlowe sometimes,” Wright wrote, lost in a “Los Angeles of words.”

那是他们父子唯一共享的家园,而赖特充分利用了父亲的“好客”。在包括2004年获得普利策奖的《走向玛莎葡萄园》在内的十四本诗集中,弗朗茨·赖特将地狱变得可以栖居,甚至近乎令人愉快。《繁花斧柄:最后的诗与残篇》(Axe in Blossom: Last Poems & Fragments,克诺普夫出版社)由诗人的遗孀伊丽莎白·厄尔克斯·赖特(Elizabeth Oehlkers Wright)在他2015年去世后编纂而成,收录了赖特维持着约翰·济慈(John Keats)所谓“死后存在”那段日子里的作品;因肺癌而垂死的他,虚弱得无法书写,便将其中一些温柔、冷硬又满嘴俏皮话的诗口述录进录音机,或者将它们作为语音留言,用一种“曾经是好嗓音的古怪沙哑低鸣”发给朋友。赖特去世后,在他公寓里拍摄的照片显示,墙壁上、家电上、咖啡滤纸上都写满了诗句,而最具波士顿特色的是,一个泡沫塑料的唐恩都乐咖啡杯上,用圆珠笔刻着诗行。如果写诗是犯罪,这看起来就像一个犯罪现场。“我有时觉得自己像菲利普·马洛(Philip Marlowe),”赖特写道,迷失在一个“词语的洛杉矶”里。

As his voracious sentience began to cleave away from his suffering frame, this “facsimile of the person” became more and more a poet of the estranged body: “I am traveling away from my body in widening rings,” he writes, and yet, “If I think I have problems, / I look for the mirror.” Any errand outdoors makes him a kind of zombie Frank O’Hara, clomping down the quiet chain-link and brick-faced blocks near his home in Waltham, Massachusetts. Even a trip six blocks to the post office is an “exceptional event, long planned.” Wright’s spectacular disarray—you worried about him, just running into him on the street—was always first an occasion for self-ridicule: spotting his own reflection on a bus one afternoon, “I looked like a suicide / returning an overdue book to the library.” On the edge of death, though, the scenario becomes nearly slapstick; strangers who come across Wright’s body on the sidewalk move “around him, the way you would / dog shit.”

随着他贪婪的感知力开始从他受苦的躯体上剥离,这个“人的仿制品”越来越成为一位书写疏离身体的诗人:“我正以不断扩大的圆环,旅行着远离我的身体,”他写道,然而,“如果我觉得自己有问题,/ 我就去找镜子。”任何外出的差事都让他变成某种僵尸版的弗兰克·奥哈拉(Frank O'Hara),在马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆市他家附近安静的铁丝网和砖墙街区沉重地踱步。就连去六个街区外的邮局,也是一件“筹划已久的特殊事件”。赖特那惊人的邋遢模样——你哪怕只是在街上碰到他,都会为他担心——首先总是自我嘲弄的由头:一天下午在公交车上瞥见自己的倒影,“我看上去像个正要去图书馆 / 还一本逾期未还的书的自杀者。”然而,在死亡边缘,这情景几乎变成了闹剧;在人行道上碰到赖特身体的陌生人,会“绕开他,就像绕开 / 狗屎一样”。

Wright’s poems are usually at least a little funny, and often work like extended punch lines; the way to read them is to try to guess the elided sick joke. What happens to the body of a lifelong smoker when he dies? In “Involuntary Detox: Smoking Porch,” it keeps smoking, of course, but not in any old crematorium:

赖特的诗通常至少有那么一点好笑,而且常常像拉长了的包袱;阅读它们的方式,就是试着去猜那个被省略的、病态的玩笑。一个终生吸烟的人死后,他的身体会怎样?在《非自愿戒瘾:吸烟廊》一诗中,它当然会继续抽烟,但不是在什么老旧的殡仪馆里:

Time for one more?

再来一根?

What are you waiting for?

你还在等什么?

Then come in.
The nicatorium’s all yours.

那就进来吧。尼古丁馆全归你了。

Nicatorium! Wright went through many periods of detox, and was institutionalized several times; here he is welcomed by a stock character, the catatonic roommate who promises he hasn’t “said a word / all day, and don’t intend to / now.” Or maybe that’s a bored crematory worker, just punching the clock—or is it God, whose weird, voyeuristic silence troubled Wright into composing some of his most powerful poems? In any case, the smoker gets his wish, and his comeuppance: “Consider yourself completely alone.” That’s a poet’s fantasy, and a child’s darkest fear.

尼古丁馆!赖特经历过多次戒瘾期,也数次被送进精神病院;在这里,迎接他的是一个老套的角色——那位患紧张性精神症的室友,他保证自己“一整天一个字 / 都没说,现在也 / 不打算说”。或者,那也可能是个无聊的火葬场工人,只是在混时间——又或者,那是上帝,他那怪异、窥淫癖般的沉默曾困扰着赖特,促使他写下了一些最有力的诗篇。无论如何,吸烟者如愿以偿,也得到了他的报应:“就当你是彻底孤身一人吧。”那是一个诗人的幻想,也是一个孩子最深的恐惧。

In these poems, anticipation is inextricable from dread. Emily Dickinson received “Heavenly Hurt” from the winter “Slant of light” entering her bedroom. As a boy, Wright kept his eye on the door, hoping that the father he idolized would someday return; to maintain this vigil into adulthood is to open oneself up to grace but also to injury. Waking in the night, Wright wonders if there is “someone else / who wakes disturbed, alone; / too bad we can’t talk / on our tiny phone.” In another insomnia poem, “Wait,” Wright keeps watch for the “late light,” which is “always / leaving” even “as it arrives.” For a child, this “steplight” could bring comfort, or it could bring a drunken thrashing. Wright wrote that his father beat him with a belt; his stepfather, he went on, “took over / somewhat more expertly.” If the soul survives, these poems suggest, it’s only by being battered out of the body.

在这些诗中,期待与恐惧密不可分。艾米莉·狄金森(Emily Dickinson)从冬日射入卧室的“斜光”里领受了“天堂般的痛楚”。而赖特小时候,眼睛一直盯着门,希望他崇拜的父亲有朝一日会回来;将这种守夜保持到成年,就是将自己敞开给恩典,也敞开给伤害。夜里醒来,赖特想知道是否还有“另一个人 / 醒来时也心神不宁,孤身一人;/ 真可惜我们不能 / 用我们的小电话交谈。”在另一首关于失眠的诗《等待》中,赖特守候着“迟来的光”,那光“总是 / 在抵达时”就“正在离去”。对一个孩子来说,这“阶梯上的光”可能带来安慰,也可能带来一场醉醺醺的毒打。赖特写道,他父亲用皮带抽他;他的继父,他接着说,“接过了手 / 手法多少更专业些。”这些诗暗示,如果灵魂幸存下来,那也只是因为它被从身体里猛揍了出来。

“Axe in Blossom” borrows its title from a line in “I Hear,” by the German Romanian poet and Holocaust survivor Paul Celan, who drowned in the Seine in 1970. Celan’s shattered “neversongs” taught Wright important elements of his own style: the lines narrowing as they approach silence, like water disappearing down a drain; the clauses and multisyllabic words split like cordwood by line breaks; the pressurized neologisms picking up where available vocabulary runs out of road; the rich, sometimes asphyxiating details that make a beeline into the senses. In an homage, “Axe in Blossom: To Paul Celan,” the dead are called back to life by the “mere scent of their wives baking bread.” It takes a little more, in fact, than the “mere scent”: it takes an elegiac poetry of sensory nearness that mixes such things as warm bread and burning bodies. Wright is something like a laureate of the putrid, the stale, the acrid, and the moldy, but also of unbidden, stunning adjacent beauty: the “still-daytime / three-quarters moon, / the first snowflakes, swirling,” even as the new day itself is unthinkable.

《繁花斧柄》的书名借自德裔罗马尼亚诗人、大屠杀幸存者保罗·策兰(Paul Celan)《我听见》中的一句诗,策兰于1970年投塞纳河自尽。策兰那些破碎的“永不之歌”教会了赖特自己风格中的重要元素:诗行在趋近沉默时收窄,如同水消失于下水道;从句和多音节词被断行像劈柴一样劈开;在现有词汇穷尽之处,高度凝练的新造词接续而上;丰富、有时令人窒息的细节直截了当地刺入感官。在一首致敬诗《繁花斧柄:致保罗·策兰》中,死者被唤回人世,凭借的是“他们妻子烤面包的纯粹气味”。事实上,这需要的比“纯粹气味”多一点:它需要一种感官贴近的哀歌体诗,将热面包和燃烧的尸体这类事物混合在一起。赖特有点像是一位书写腐臭、陈腐、辛辣和霉变的桂冠诗人,但也是书写不期而至、令人惊愕的毗邻之美的诗人:“仍是白昼的 / 四分之三月亮,/ 最初的雪花,纷飞旋转”,即使新的一天本身是难以想象的。

Celan’s influence is tricky to absorb for any poet who did not suffer in a labor camp or witness his parents taken away to be murdered by the S.S. It is impossible to isolate Celan’s aesthetic innovations from his trauma and its historical meanings; Wright preëmpts that bind by presenting his own suffering as sort of lame and clumsy. It keeps him, in these last poems, from putting his finger on the tragedy scale: there are “so many things worse than death,” he writes, and killing, even killing a fly, is one of them. He quotes the haiku master Issa:

对于任何没有在劳改营中受过苦,或目睹父母被党卫军带走杀害的诗人来说,策兰的影响都很难吸收。不可能将策兰的美学创新与他的创伤及其历史意义分离开来;赖特通过将自己所受的苦呈现得有点蹩脚和笨拙,先发制人地摆脱了这种束缚。这使他在这些最后的诗作中,无法在悲剧的天平上确定自己的位置:“有太多比死亡更糟糕的事,”他写道,而杀戮,哪怕是杀死一只苍蝇,也是其中之一。他引用了俳句大师一茶的诗:

Oh why would you swat them, the poor
things, forever
wringing their skinny hands

哦,你为什么要拍打它们,这些可怜的东西,永远在绞着它们瘦骨嶙峋的双手

Wright’s body is dog shit, after all—don’t kill his companions! “More than ever I am haunted by the lives of the small, brief, powerless, filthy, and poor,” he writes. But “filthy” suggests something less than a Buddhist’s commitment to the flies’ well-being. In other poems, Wright has some fun at the expense of a cricket (“my friend describing you over the phone, chronicling your brief life and fairly gruesome end, both of us guiltily chuckling”) and a moth (“once it observes you have noticed it or given any indication its presence is a nuisance, you will very soon find yourself the perpetual loser in a chronic contest of wills”). We don’t read Wright for the purity of his moral life but for the erratic comedy of his good intentions yielding to blurted reversals and denunciations.

毕竟,赖特的身体就是狗屎——别杀他的同伴!“我前所未有地被那些渺小、短暂、无力、肮脏和贫穷的生命所困扰,”他写道。但“肮脏”这个词暗示着,这并非佛教徒对苍蝇福祉的完全投入。在其他诗中,赖特拿一只蟋蟀(“我的朋友在电话里向我描述你,记录你短暂的生命和相当可怕的下场,我们俩都愧疚地轻声笑着”)和一只飞蛾(“一旦它发现你已经注意到它,或表现出任何迹象表明它的存在是个麻烦,你很快就会发现自己在一场漫长的意志较量中永远是输家”)开了些玩笑。我们读赖特,不是为了他道德生活的纯洁,而是为了他那善意屈从于脱口而出的反转和谴责时,所产生的那种飘忽不定的喜剧。

All the unresolved, zigzagging impulses give even Wright’s finished work here some of the raggedness of drafts. “Axe in Blossom” is in every sense an open book, practically an open studio. We see its striking title gestate through multiple phases—in a translation, an original poem, and a collage poem made from lines by Celan, Czesław Miłosz, and Rainer Brambach. There are “Three Homages,” two poems called “The Writing” (the second, marked “2,” is presented first), one poem called “The Lamp, 2” that insinuates an absent predecessor, two called “The Kiss,” and so on; the poems reshuffle the same vocabulary, the same images, the same settings and themes. The volume begins with more or less “complete” work, passes through some abandoned drafts, then trails off into an appendix, “Burial Herbs,” which works like a commonplace book of maxims, partial poems, and poems nominally complete but “unfinishable,” in the sense that certain poems, perhaps the most ambitious ones, only approximate their maker’s vision.

所有这些悬而未决、曲折迂回的冲动,甚至给赖特在这里的完成之作也赋予了一些草稿的粗粝感。《繁花斧柄》从各种意义上说都是一本敞开的书,几乎是一个开放的工作室。我们看到它那引人注目的书名经历了多个阶段的孕育——在一篇翻译、一首原创诗和一首由策兰、切斯瓦夫·米沃什(Czesław Miłosz)和赖纳·布拉姆巴赫(Rainer Brambach)的诗句组成的拼贴诗中。书中有“三首致敬诗”,两首名为《写作》的诗(标着“2”的第二首被放在了前面),一首名为《灯,2》的诗暗示着存在一首缺席的前作,两首名为《吻》的诗,等等;这些诗重新洗牌了相同的词汇、相同的意象、相同的场景和主题。这本诗集以或多或少“完成”的作品开始,经过一些被放弃的草稿,然后逐渐转入一个附录“安葬之草”,它像一本箴言、残篇和名义上完成但“无法完成”的诗的札记簿,“无法完成”是指某些诗,也许是最具雄心的那些,只能接近其创造者的愿景。

Among the “unfinishables” is a poem that I consider a masterpiece, probably one of Wright’s very best. Dedicated to the German poet Karl Krolow, “At His Desk in the Past” was “transcribed from self-recorded drafts on audio,” in 2012. It’s “raining in a dead language” out the window, as Wright measures the duration of his life against various phenomena—some brief, like an infant’s fever, some ancient, like the stars. The poem, written in linked prose blocks, is too long to quote in full, and is quite intricate. But one passage gives a sense of its eerie logic. Wright describes the words of his poem “still traveling toward the world although he is not there although he is not here or anywhere”:

在这些“无法完成”的诗中,有一首我认为是杰作,很可能是赖特最好的作品之一。这首献给德国诗人卡尔·克罗洛(Karl Krolow)的《在过去,在他的书桌前》,于2012年“根据自录的音频草稿誊写”。窗外“下着一种死语言”,赖特将自己的生命时长与各种现象进行比对——有些短暂,如婴儿的发烧,有些古老,如星辰。这首诗以相连的散文体段落写成,篇幅太长,无法全文引用,而且相当复杂。但有一段话能让人感受到它那怪异的逻辑。赖特描述他诗中的词语“仍在朝着世界旅行,尽管他已不在那里,尽管他已不在此处或任何地方”:

AND we’d do it again wouldn’t we—every last one of us choosing precisely what we had been given, a glimpse of a night sky—no—choosing precisely what we had been given not to be a sky of infinite diamonds unaware they live forever or exist at all but a pair of mortal eyes with the glory to see them, grieving their loss, a glimpse.

而且我们会再来一次,不是吗——我们每一个人,恰恰选择我们曾被赋予的东西,瞥见一眼夜空——不——恰恰选择我们曾被赋予的东西,不是成为一片由无尽钻石组成的、意识不到自己永生或存在的天空,而是一双凡人的眼睛,拥有看见它们的荣耀,为它们的消逝而悲伤,一瞥。

Wright welcomes those stars into his own “BRAIN or desert hive this named mind or single roaring.” The poem ends by conferring a childish name, a name that a kid might dream up, on these sad, undying presences, with their “honey-colored irises” and “muted wings” of light and motion: “BEE-iridescent.”

赖特欢迎那些星辰进入他自己的“大脑或荒漠蜂巢,这被命名的头脑或单一的咆哮”。这首诗的结尾,赋予这些悲伤、不灭的存在一个孩子气的名字,一个孩子可能想出来的名字,带着它们“蜜色的虹膜”和光与运动的“无声的翅膀”:“蜜蜂—虹彩”。

Rounding the bend, the book tours Wright’s points of origin: recollections of his first poems, his first trip to Europe, his first cigarette, the first signs of the addictions that so blighted the poet’s life. Wright hears now “the sound of my name posed, in my young mother’s voice before I finally slept.” The poet tucks into his deathbed, its “sheets / the color of old aspirin”:

转过弯来,这本书巡览了赖特的各个起点:对他最初诗作的回忆,他第一次去欧洲的旅行,他的第一支烟,以及如此摧残了诗人一生的瘾癖的最初迹象。赖特此刻听见“我名字的声音,在我终于入睡前,由我年轻的母亲提出”。诗人蜷进他的临终之床,床单“是旧阿司匹林的颜色”:

I had often wondered
where I would find it,
it find me, or
what it would look like.
Don’t you?

我常常想,我会在哪里找到它,它在哪里找到我,或者它会是什么样子。你不也这样想吗?

But, hey, it’s not a deathbed until you die in it: “I could get some work done / here, I shrugged,” Wright decides. “I had done it before.” ♦

但是,嘿,在你死在里面之前,它还不算一张临终之床:“我可以在这里干点活儿,”赖特耸耸肩,下了决心。“我以前就这么干过。” ♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month