The Current Cinema

In “Disclosure Day,” Steven Spielberg Replays the Hits

《披露日》:斯皮尔伯格重弹旧调
His new alien thriller has shades of “Close Encounters of the Third Kind,” “Minority Report,” even “The Post”—but the retreads yield diminishing returns.
这部外星人题材的新惊悚片,隐约可见《第三类接触》《少数派报告》甚至《华盛顿邮报》的影子——但这些自我重复的回报正日渐稀薄。
June 10, 2026
Emily Blunt Josh O'Connor Colin Firth looking up at the sky
Illustration by Fabien Corre

It’s been nearly four years since we’ve had a new Steven Spielberg picture—an unusually long, but understandable, wait. Spielberg, though as nimble an entertainer as we’ve got, will turn eighty this December, and the halcyon overachieving years of “Jurassic Park” and “Schindler’s List” (1993), “Minority Report” and “Catch Me If You Can” (2002), and “War of the Worlds” and “Munich” (2005) seem far behind him. His most recent feature, “The Fabelmans” (2022), was the kind of piercingly confessional work that might have put a lesser filmmaker out to pasture (not that a lesser filmmaker could have made “The Fabelmans”). After digging deep into his formative memories—chief among them his childhood surrender to the movies, which would define him, and which he would forever redefine—where, exactly, could Spielberg go next?

我们已有将近四年没看到史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)的新作了——这段等待格外漫长,却也不难理解。斯皮尔伯格虽是我们所拥有的最敏捷的娱乐大师,今年十二月就将年满八十,而《侏罗纪公园》与《辛德勒的名单》(1993)、《少数派报告》与《猫鼠游戏》(2002)、《世界之战》与《慕尼黑》(2005)那些辉煌超产的年月,似乎已离他远去。他最近一部作品《造梦之家》(2022),是那种剖白至深的自传式创作,换作功力稍逊的导演,恐怕就此收山了(当然,功力稍逊的导演也拍不出《造梦之家》)。在深掘了自己那些塑造性的记忆之后——其中最重要的,是他童年时对电影的臣服,那既定义了他,又被他不断重新定义——斯皮尔伯格下一步,究竟还能往哪儿走?

The opening scenes of his new blockbuster, “Disclosure Day,” offer up a hilarious answer: a pro-wrestling match, of course, for a rejuvenating dose of adrenaline. It’s a more pummelling kind of Spielberg spectacle than we’re used to, and also a canny diversion; in the bleachers, a far more consequential clash of wills is secretly playing out. Daniel Kellner (Josh O’Connor), a sharp-witted cybersecurity expert, plans to blow the whistle on the sinister non-government agency wardex, short for Waived Reporting, Development, and Extraction. His former boss, Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth), is determined to stop him from exposing the group’s secrets: namely, that alien life-forms exist, and that the agency has concealed evidence of their visits for decades.

他的新大片《披露日》开场几幕,给出了一个滑稽的答案:一场职业摔角赛,当然是为了来一剂让人重焕活力的肾上腺素。这是斯皮尔伯格式奇观中比我们惯常见到的更拳拳到肉的一种,也是一次巧妙的声东击西;在看台上,一场远为重大的意志较量正在暗中展开。机智过人的网络安全专家丹尼尔·凯尔纳(乔什·奥康纳 Josh O'Connor 饰)计划揭发那个阴险的非政府机构 wardex——即“豁免报告、开发与提取”(Waived Reporting, Development, and Extraction)的缩写。他的前上司诺亚·斯坎伦(科林·费尔斯 Colin Firth 饰)则决意阻止他曝光该组织的秘密:即外星生命形式确实存在,而该机构数十年来一直隐瞒他们造访的证据。

Soon, Daniel has fled with his girlfriend, Jane (Eve Hewson), and a device loaded with incriminating evidence, which they plan to make public if Scanlon and his minions don’t kill them first. Explaining his Snowdenesque attack of conscience, Daniel insists that the truth isn’t proprietary but, rather, “belongs to eight billion people.” He’s not alone in his conviction. Several other wardex employees have also gone rogue, led by Hugo Wakefield (Colman Domingo), who helps Daniel remain (barely) one step ahead of his pursuers. They also have a potent, if unknowing, ally in Margaret Fairchild (Emily Blunt), a meteorologist from Kansas City, Missouri, who abruptly finds herself over the weather. Delivering her morning report, she begins emitting guttural click-click noises, as if she’s been possessed by a Predator. What does this mean? And how, for that matter, can she suddenly read people’s minds?

很快,丹尼尔便带着女友简(伊芙·休森 Eve Hewson 饰)和一个装满罪证的装置出逃,他们计划,如果斯坎伦及其手下没能先杀掉他们,就将这些证据公之于众。在解释自己斯诺登式的良心发现时,丹尼尔坚称真相并非私有财产,而是“属于八十亿人”。他并非孤身一人怀有这份信念。wardex 的其他几名雇员也已叛离,为首的是雨果·韦克菲尔德(科尔曼·多明戈 Colman Domingo 饰),他帮助丹尼尔勉强领先追捕者一步。他们还有一位强大却毫不知情的盟友:玛格丽特·费尔柴尔德(艾米莉·布朗特 Emily Blunt 饰),一位来自密苏里州堪萨斯城的气象学家,她突然发现自己播报天气时出了状况。在播送晨间预报时,她开始发出喉音浓重的咔嗒咔嗒声,仿佛被铁血战士附了身。这意味着什么?还有,她怎么突然间就能读懂别人的心思了?

Before long, Margaret and her nonplussed partner, Jackson (Wyatt Russell), are also on the run, and although the destination is uncertain, we find ourselves in vintage Spielberg terrain. The cross-country crosscutting is propulsive, and the many chase sequences are filmed with breathtaking agility; at one point, a car tussles with a freight train and loses, in predictable yet spectacular fashion. Spielberg shifts tonal gears with practiced ease, a sense of awe going hand in hand with an ebullient comic anarchy. An early confrontation between Scanlon and Daniel encapsulates these extremes: Firth has seldom looked more malevolently grizzled, whereas O’Connor, even under the direst circumstances, retains his elfin mischief. When you remember that both actors have played British royalty—Firth in “The King’s Speech” (2010) and O’Connor on two seasons of “The Crown”—their characters’ enmity feels even funnier. Not least among the inspired eccentricities of this American road movie is the fact that Spielberg has cast the major roles with English actors (plus Hewson, who’s Irish). This proves a particular coup in the case of Blunt, who here gets to merge her comedy and action chops within a more earnestly emotive register, playing Margaret as a fount of crackpot conviction.

没过多久,玛格丽特和她那位处变不惊的伴侣杰克逊(怀亚特·拉塞尔 Wyatt Russell 饰)也踏上了逃亡之路,尽管目的地尚不明确,我们却发现自己已置身于经典的斯皮尔伯格领地。横跨全国的交叉剪辑充满推进力,众多追逐场面以惊人的敏捷度拍摄完成;有一处,一辆轿车与一列货运火车缠斗并落败,方式虽可预见,却蔚为壮观。斯皮尔伯格以娴熟的技巧切换着调性,敬畏感与奔放的喜剧式混乱并行不悖。斯坎伦与丹尼尔之间的一场早期对峙浓缩了这两种极端:费尔斯极少显得如此恶狠狠的饱经风霜,而奥康纳,即便在最险恶的境地下,仍保留着他精灵般的顽皮。当你想起两位演员都饰演过英国王室——费尔斯在《国王的演讲》(2010)中,奥康纳在《王冠》的两季里——他们角色间的敌意就显得愈发滑稽了。这部美国公路片诸多灵感迸发的怪诞之处中,并非最不重要的一点是,斯皮尔伯格将主要角色都交给了英国演员(外加爱尔兰裔的休森)。这对布朗特来说尤其是一着妙棋,她得以在此将喜剧与动作功底融入一种更真挚动人的表达,把玛格丽特演绎成一个充满古怪信念的源泉。

Margaret, following her nutty North Star wherever it leads, would have been right at home in “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” (1977), in which U.F.O. sightings make enraptured believers of a select few. But that’s hardly the only Spielberg joint that gets revisited. A reference to Roswell harks back to the extraterrestrial shenanigans of “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” (2009), which, like this film, was written by David Koepp. (He also co-wrote “War of the Worlds,” another alien saga.) When Margaret begins using her telepathic powers, you might flash back to Agatha from “Minority Report,” spouting oracular warnings at every stranger who crosses her path. At times, the new movie recalls Spielberg’s journalistic thriller, “The Post” (2017), which likewise hinges on the dissemination of information that, the powers that be caution, would pose a grave threat to national security.

玛格丽特追随着她那疯狂的北极星,无论它指向何方,这个角色放在《第三类接触》(1977)里也会如鱼得水,在那部片中,UFO 目击事件让少数人成了心醉神迷的信徒。但这远非唯一被重访的斯皮尔伯格作品。一处提及罗斯威尔的细节,令人回想起《夺宝奇兵4:水晶骷髅王国》(2009)中的外星恶作剧,该片与本片一样,由大卫·凯普(David Koepp)编剧。(他还合写了另一部外星人传奇《世界之战》。)当玛格丽特开始运用她的心灵感应能力时,你可能会闪回到《少数派报告》中的阿加莎,对每个路遇的陌生人发出神谕般的警告。有时,这部新片又让人想起斯皮尔伯格的新闻惊悚片《华盛顿邮报》(2017),后者同样系于信息的传播,而当权者警告说,这些信息将对国家安全构成严重威胁。

The real menace here isn’t the aliens—prototypically gray-green, pear-headed beings who, in our occasional glimpses of them, look vulnerable, even frail—but, Scanlon suggests, humanity itself, which is far too hubristic and divided to handle the knowledge of their existence. He and his wardex colleagues have turned this foul conviction into a self-fulfilling prophecy: for decades, they have subjected aliens to unspeakable acts of torture, and then hidden evidence of those abuses. You may well think of “E.T.” (1982), with its rather rosier vision of an outer-space visitor being held against its will. These close encounters, by contrast, have been anything but kind.

这里真正的威胁并非外星人——那些典型灰绿色、梨形脑袋的生物,在我们偶尔瞥见时,显得脆弱甚至孱弱——斯坎伦暗示,真正的威胁是人类自身,人类太过傲慢、太过分裂,无法承受知晓他们存在的事实。他和他的 wardex 同僚们已将这种恶劣的信念变成了一种自我实现的预言:数十年来,他们对外星人施加了难以言喻的酷刑,然后隐瞒了这些暴行的证据。你很可能会想起《E.T. 外星人》(1982),那部片对一位被违背意愿扣留的外星访客,有着远为乐观的描绘。相比之下,这些“接触”绝非善意。

In February, former President Barack Obama made waves when, during an interview with the YouTuber Brian Tyler Cohen, he said that aliens are “real, but I haven’t seen them.” (He later clarified, in an Instagram post: “I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really!”) Hours after the interview was posted, Donald Trump rebuked Obama for revealing “classified information”—then, not to be out-revealed, said that his Administration would release government files related to U.F.O.s and U.A.P.s, or unidentified anomalous phenomena. Last month, the Pentagon published a tranche of “new, never-before-seen” images, with the promise of more to come, though the initial evidence has been generally deemed too vague to be conclusive.

今年二月,前总统巴拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)在接受 YouTube 博主布莱恩·泰勒·科恩(Brian Tyler Cohen)采访时引起轩然大波,他说外星人“是真的,但我没见过他们”。(他后来在 Instagram 帖文中澄清:“我在总统任期内没有看到任何证据表明外星人与我们有过接触。真的!”)采访发布数小时后,唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)便指责奥巴马泄露了“机密信息”——接着,不甘在爆料上落后,表示他的政府将公开与 UFO 和 UAP(不明异常现象)相关的政府档案。上个月,五角大楼公布了一批“前所未见的新”图像,并承诺会有更多公布,尽管初步证据普遍被认为过于模糊,无法定论。

Reality, then, has provided its share of free publicity for “Disclosure Day,” but it might be equally fair to say that it has let the air out of the movie’s tires. The tread is a bit worn, in any case. Ostensibly set in the present, with many grim, furrowed-brow references to a Third World War on the horizon, the film plays like a throwback to summer entertainments from earlier decades—and not just because the title evokes “Independence Day” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day,” two foundational science-fiction blockbusters of the nineties. Koepp’s screenplay samples everything from the sinister government conspiracies of “The X-Files” to the crop-circle mysteries of M. Night Shyamalan’s “Signs” (2002). There’s even a certain nostalgia, verging on naïveté, in the prominent narrative positioning of Margaret’s Kansas City news station. It’s touching to think that Daniel and Margaret’s revolution might be televised— or that American broadcast news, a medium as existentially threatened as it is politically polarized, might turn out to be a vital, globally unifying force.

如此看来,现实已为《披露日》提供了不少免费宣传,但同样公平地说,现实也放掉了这部电影轮胎里的气。无论如何,胎面花纹已有些磨损。影片表面上设定在当下,对一触即发的第三次世界大战多有阴郁、眉头紧锁的提及,但观感却像是对更早几十年的暑期娱乐片的回溯——这不仅仅是因为片名让人联想到《独立日》和《终结者2:审判日》这两部九十年代奠基性的科幻大片。凯普的剧本采样了从《X档案》中邪恶的政府阴谋到 M·奈特·沙马兰(M. Night Shyamalan)《天兆》(2002)中麦田怪圈之谜的一切元素。甚至,在将玛格丽特所在的堪萨斯城新闻台置于显著叙事位置这一点上,也透着某种近乎天真的怀旧。认为丹尼尔和玛格丽特的革命或许能通过电视播出——或者说,认为美国广播电视新闻这个既在政治上两极分化、又在生存上饱受威胁的媒体,竟可能成为一股至关重要的、团结全球的力量——这种想法令人动容。

In the end, Koepp’s script exaggerates the best and the worst of how humans might respond to such a revelation, and Spielberg struggles to split the difference between paranoid-thriller cynicism and his usual mode of emotional uplift. That waffling ultimately strands “Disclosure Day” on a heartfelt yet fuzzy middle ground, with a generalized plea for cross-species understanding that, even bolstered by the reliable stirrings of a John Williams score, left me dispiritingly dry-eyed. Domingo’s Hugo, saddled with one of the movie’s windier monologues, argues for “empathy as an evolutionary advantage.” Rather more persuasive is a peripheral character, Sister Maura (Elizabeth Marvel), a Catholic nun who articulates a benevolently progressive view of faith. The existence of extraterrestrial life, she insists, does not negate the existence of God; it confirms that God is, like the universe he created, infinitely greater than humans realize. (It could be the script’s most topical and intellectually provocative thread, given what the Times’ Ruth Graham has called the “unsettling theological implications” of Trump’s alien-data dump for the conservative Christians who form much of his base.)

最终,凯普的剧本夸大了人类面对此种启示时可能做出的最好与最坏反应,而斯皮尔伯格则在偏执惊悚片的冷嘲热讽与他惯常的情感升华模式之间,艰难地寻求折中。这种摇摆不定,最终将《披露日》搁浅在了一个用心良苦却模糊不清的中间地带,伴随着一个泛泛的、呼吁跨物种理解的恳求,即便有约翰·威廉姆斯(John Williams)配乐那可靠的煽情烘托,仍让我沮丧地无动于衷。多明戈饰演的雨果,背负着片中最冗长空洞的独白之一,为“作为进化优势的同理心”辩护。更具说服力的,是一个边缘角色,修女莫拉(伊丽莎白·马维尔 Elizabeth Marvel 饰),她阐述了一种仁慈进步的信仰观。她坚称,外星生命的存在并不否定上帝的存在;它恰恰证实了上帝,如同他所创造的宇宙一样,远比人类意识到的更为无限。(这可能是剧本中最具话题性和智识挑衅意味的一条线索,考虑到《纽约时报》的露丝·格雷厄姆(Ruth Graham)所称的特朗普外星人数据大放送,对构成其基本盘主体的保守派基督徒而言,具有“令人不安的神学意涵”。)

Spielberg may be a self-professed agnostic, but he believes fervently in certain kinds of miracles, and his film overflows with technological signs and wonders. Scanlon’s most lethal weapon is basically a dental chair, albeit one that allows him to drill into, and control, the minds of his enemies. Margaret, at one point, acquires the ability to turn herself and her comrades invisible, a piece of Houdini-level trickery so pleasing that it threatens to transform “Disclosure Day” into the last thing it needs to be: a commentary on the magic of movies. The metaphor is sealed, I fear, by a bathetic sequence that guides a character into an exact replica of her childhood house—a film set, more or less—so that the traumatic events that once unfolded there can be excavated and exposed. “The Fabelmans” made a rich feast of domestic angst, but even an artist as innately self-reflexive as Spielberg shouldn’t merely repeat himself. Though “Disclosure Day” teems with intelligent life, it also blurs the line—not the one separating us from them but the one between phoning home and phoning it in. ♦

斯皮尔伯格或许自称是不可知论者,但他对某些奇迹深信不疑,他的电影也充溢着科技的征兆与奇观。斯坎伦最致命的武器基本上就是一把牙科治疗椅,尽管这把椅子能让他钻入并控制敌人的心智。玛格丽特在某个时刻获得了让自己和同伴隐形的能力,这一胡迪尼级别的戏法如此讨喜,几乎要将《披露日》变成它最不需要成为的东西:一则关于电影魔法的评论。我担心,这个隐喻被一段煽情过度的段落坐实了,该段落引导一个角色进入她童年住所的精确复制品——差不多就是一个电影布景——以便那些曾在那里上演的创伤事件能被挖掘和曝光。《造梦之家》已将家庭焦虑烹制成一场盛宴,但即便是像斯皮尔伯格这样天生具有自我指涉性的艺术家,也不该仅仅重复自己。尽管《披露日》充满了智慧生命,它却也模糊了那条界线——不是分隔我们与他们的那条,而是介于“打电话回家”与“敷衍交差”之间的那条。 ♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month