The Current Cinema

Christopher Nolan Has Always Been Making “The Odyssey”

克里斯托弗·诺兰一直在拍《奥德赛》
In a starry, stirring adaptation of Homer’s epic, the director’s signature realism grounds, without dispelling, the drama’s emotional and mythological power.
在这部星光熠熠、动人心魄的荷马史诗改编作品中,导演标志性的现实主义手法,并未驱散戏剧的情感与神话力量,反而为其奠定了根基。
Various figures stand in the forest wearing armor.
Photograph by Melinda Sue Gordon / Universal Pictures

In one of many astonishing scenes in Christopher Nolan’s new film, “The Odyssey,” several men sit around a table on a remote island, noisily devouring a meaty stew that a woman has laid before them. They are reaping the benefits, or so it seems, of Zeus’ law, which is rooted in xenia, the ancient Greek concept of hospitality. The rule is unwritten, but, this being a Nolan movie, it doesn’t go unspoken; like nearly all the director’s structuring principles, Zeus’ law is invoked repeatedly, with an almost incantatory awe. It’s a directive and a warning: welcome the stranger into your home with food and drink, for you never know if they might be a god in disguise. In this case, though, the guests are mere mortals, Greek veterans of the Trojan War, and it is their host, played by a mesmerizing Samantha Morton, who turns out to be supernatural. She is the sorceress Circe, and she transforms the men into pigs—the very creatures, she says, that their gluttony has shown them to be.

在克里斯托弗·诺兰的新片《奥德赛》众多令人惊叹的场景中,有一幕是这样的:在一座偏远岛屿上,几个男人围桌而坐,狼吞虎咽地吃着一位女子端上来的炖肉。他们似乎正享受着宙斯律法的恩惠,这条律法植根于古希腊的待客之道。规矩虽不成文,但在诺兰的电影里,它不会被默不作声地略过;如同导演几乎所有的结构原则,宙斯的律法被反复提及,带着近乎咒语般的敬畏。这是一条指令,也是一个警告:要用食物和饮水欢迎陌生人进家,因为你永远不知道他们会不会是神祇伪装。然而,在这个场景中,客人们只是凡人,是特洛伊战争的希腊老兵,而他们的主人,由令人着迷的萨曼莎·莫顿饰演,才是超自然的存在。她是女巫喀耳刻,她把这些人变成了猪——她说,这正是他们的贪食所显露出的本性。

Even so, you can’t begrudge the men a hot meal. For years, they have been stuck at sea with their leader, the great warrior king Odysseus (Matt Damon), trying to find a route home to Ithaca; hunger and desperation have spurred his fiery second-in-command, Eurylochus (Himesh Patel), toward mutiny. What befalls them on Circe’s island smacks of a similar punishment from the animated fantasy “Spirited Away” (2002), in which a greedy couple are turned into boars after gorging themselves in an enchanted food court. Nolan gives the men’s faces a swinish aspect even before they start to go all oinky. The transformation itself is remarkably lifelike—an illusion achieved with fleshy, tactile closeups rather than C.G.I. pyrotechnics. Morton’s Circe, evoking the snarling villainy of the late Jean Marsh (in fantasy films such as “Willow” and “Return to Oz”), favors a hands-on approach to witchcraft; listen to her coo and coax as she calmly sculpts a face into a snout. You’re reminded of Nolan’s wonkish instincts as a filmmaker: again and again, he shows us the mechanics of the impossible—not just the big-picture what but also the nuts-and-bolts how.

即便如此,你也不能怪这些男人想吃顿热饭。多年来,他们和首领——伟大的武士国王奥德修斯(马特·达蒙 饰)——一起困在海上,试图找到返回伊萨卡的路;饥饿与绝望,已将他性情火爆的副手欧律洛科斯(希米什·帕特尔 饰)推向叛变的边缘。他们在喀耳刻岛上的遭遇,与动画奇幻片《千与千寻》(2002)中的惩罚相似:一对贪婪的夫妇在魔法美食街大吃特吃后变成了猪。诺兰甚至在这些人开始发出猪叫声之前,就已赋予他们的面孔几分猪相。变形过程本身异常逼真——这种幻觉是通过肉感、触感十足的特写镜头实现的,而非电脑特效的烟火。莫顿饰演的喀耳刻,让人想起已故的琼·马什(曾出演《风云际会》、《重返奥兹国》等奇幻片)那种咆哮的邪恶,她偏爱亲自动手的巫术;听她平静地将一张脸塑造成猪鼻时轻柔的哄劝声。这让你想起诺兰作为电影制作人的考据癖:他一次又一次地向我们展示不可能之事的运作机制——不仅是宏观的“是什么”,还有具体的“如何做”。

Here is one answer, then, to a question that some of us raised the moment this curious project was announced: How would Hollywood’s most stubborn logician adapt to Homer’s world of gods and monsters? Until now, nearly all mythology has been Greek to Nolan. This “Odyssey” takes place, we’re told at the outset, during “a time of apparent magic,” a skeptical formulation if ever there was one. And although the enchantments that follow are certainly real, they feel sparingly, even reluctantly, conjured. For his critics, Nolan’s realist instincts will seem like an inability to surrender fully to the wonderment of the tale, indicating a fundamental mismatch between filmmaker and material. But much of the pleasure of “The Odyssey” comes from watching Nolan think his way through this tension and figure out how much of his own mastery to assert over an existing masterwork. His rationalism is an armor against kitsch, obviousness, familiarity, and visual-effects bloat; it provides just the note of real-world groundedness that a great fantasy needs to achieve liftoff. It’s also a bridge between the ancient and the modern, ushering us into the minds of characters who inhabit a kind of polytheist-secularist limbo, and who suspect, for all their prayers and offerings, that the gods have long since abandoned them.

那么,当这个奇特的项目宣布时,我们一些人立刻提出的问题,这里有了一个答案:好莱坞最固执的逻辑学家,会如何改编荷马笔下神魔横行的世界?在此之前,几乎所有神话对诺兰而言都如同天书。这部《奥德赛》,开篇就告诉我们,故事发生在“一个看似存在魔法的时代”——这真是最怀疑论的说法了。尽管随后的魔法无疑是真实的,但它们给人的感觉是克制、甚至不情愿地施展出来的。对诺兰的批评者来说,他的现实主义本能,会显得像是无法完全臣服于故事的奇观,表明电影人与素材之间存在根本性的错位。但《奥德赛》的许多乐趣,恰恰在于看诺兰如何思考并穿越这种张力,琢磨出该在多大程度上,将他自己的掌控力施加于一部已有的杰作之上。他的理性主义,是抵御媚俗、陈词滥调、耳熟能详和视觉特效泛滥的铠甲;它恰好提供了一部伟大奇幻作品升空所需的现实世界的真实感。它也是一座连接古代与现代的桥梁,引领我们进入角色的内心,这些角色栖居于一种多神论-世俗论的边缘地带,尽管他们不断祈祷和献祭,却怀疑众神早已抛弃了他们。

“The Odyssey” begins elliptically, with images of a restless tide, an ominous rumble of drumbeats, and searching snippets of narration that situate us, as Nolan often does, in a labyrinth of guilty memories. Nearly twenty years after the fall of Troy, Odysseus, stricken with amnesia by the island nymph Calypso (Charlize Theron), is a lost man in every sense, tormented by misdeeds that he can neither undo nor fully remember. What haunts him most clearly is the ingenious trick he devised with the Trojan horse—here no rickety contraption on wheels, as it’s often depicted in popular culture, but a gleaming statue perched on its hind legs, eternally poised to attack. Was this pose the faintest of clues to the Trojans, signalling what would befall them once they dragged this offering through their city gates? Perhaps. As one Ithacan subject fondly recalls, Odysseus always had an unfashionable belief in playing fair.

《奥德赛》以省略的方式开场,伴随着躁动不安的潮水画面、不祥的隆隆鼓声,以及探索性的旁白片段,如诺兰惯常所做的那样,将我们置于一个充满负罪记忆的迷宫。特洛伊陷落近二十年后,奥德修斯被岛上仙女卡吕普索(查理兹·塞隆 饰)施法而失忆,他成了一个彻头彻尾迷失的人,被他既无法挽回也无法完全记起的恶行所折磨。最清晰地萦绕着他的,是他用特洛伊木马想出的那个巧妙诡计——此处的木马并非流行文化中常描绘的那种摇摇晃晃的带轮装置,而是一尊后腿站立、永远蓄势攻击的闪亮雕像。这个姿势,是否曾给特洛伊人一丝微弱的线索,预示着他们将这祭品拖进城后会发生什么?也许吧。正如一位伊萨卡臣民深情回忆的那样,奥德修斯总有一种不合时宜的信念,认为应当公平竞争。

Back in Ithaca, his wife, Penelope (Anne Hathaway), and their grown son, Telemachus (Tom Holland), who hasn’t seen his father since childhood, cling uneasily to the hope that Odysseus is alive and on his way home. So does the king’s loyal swineherd, Eumaeus (John Leguizamo), who, in this telling, has gone blind and is thus endowed with near-Tiresian powers of perception. Meanwhile, the palace has been besieged by loutish suitors, led by the scheming Antinous (Robert Pattinson), all of them vying for the queen’s hand in remarriage and mooching off the absent king’s food and wine. Given Nolan’s tendency to throw a narrative curveball or two, the great surprise of all this Ithacan setup is how devoid of surprises it is—how willingly it hews to the spirit and structure, if seldom the letter, of the poem. Indeed, Nolan’s well-known penchant for nonlinear plotting dovetails neatly with the way that Homer’s epic, influenced by the oral tradition from which it most likely sprang, shuffles perspectives and time lines.

回到伊萨卡,他的妻子佩涅洛佩(安妮·海瑟薇 饰)和他们已成年的儿子忒勒玛科斯(汤姆·赫兰德 饰),后者自童年后再未见过父亲,正不安地抱着奥德修斯还活着、正在归途的希望。国王忠诚的牧猪人欧迈俄斯(约翰·雷吉扎莫 饰)也是如此,在这个版本中,他已失明,因此被赋予了近乎忒瑞西阿斯般的洞察力。与此同时,王宫已被粗鄙的求婚者们围困,为首的是诡计多端的安提诺俄斯(罗伯特·帕丁森 饰),他们全都为赢得王后再婚而竞争,并白吃白喝着不在场的国王的食物和酒。考虑到诺兰喜欢在叙事中抛出几个曲线球的倾向,所有这些伊萨卡背景设定最大的惊喜,恰恰在于它毫无惊喜——它多么情愿地遵循了原诗的精神和结构,尽管很少拘泥于字句。事实上,诺兰著名的非线性叙事偏好,与荷马史诗(很可能受其起源的口述传统影响)打乱视角和时间线的方式,巧妙地吻合了。

The film, Nolan has noted in interviews, emerged from an exhaustive study of the work in multiple versions, chiefly Emily Wilson’s celebrated translation, from 2017. But he has also been ringing variations on the Odyssey for decades, and the new film has the quality of a palimpsest, in which even familiar twists in the tale reverberate anew with echoes from across his filmography. When he shows Odysseus and his men hiding inside the Trojan horse on the beach—an agonizing, days-long baptism by piss, shit, and seawater—you may recall “Dunkirk” (2017), with its hellish evocation of the tides of war. And when Calypso’s spell drains seven years from Odysseus’ life in seemingly an instant, it’s difficult not to flash back to “Memento” (2001), with its pitiless tale of manipulation and memory loss, or “Interstellar” (2014), in which an astronaut’s roughly three-hour detour costs him more than two decades of Earth time.

诺兰在采访中指出,这部电影源于对多个版本作品的详尽研究,主要是艾米丽·威尔逊2017年备受赞誉的译本。但他几十年来也一直在对《奥德赛》进行变奏创作,这部新片因此具有一种重写本的质感,故事中即便是熟悉的转折,也因他电影作品中的回响而产生了新的共鸣。当他展示奥德修斯和手下藏在海滩上的特洛伊木马里时——一场由尿、屎和海水构成的、长达数日的痛苦洗礼——你可能会想起《敦刻尔克》(2017)中对战争潮汐地狱般的描绘。当卡吕普索的咒语似乎在一瞬间就耗尽了奥德修斯七年的生命时,很难不闪回到《记忆碎片》(2001)中那个关于操纵和失忆的无情故事,或是《星际穿越》(2014)中,一位宇航员大约三小时的绕行,却让他付出了二十多年地球时间的代价。

Late in that space odyssey, Matt Damon popped up as a wayward astronaut, so desperate to return home that he betrayed his fellow-travellers. Did Nolan have an inkling, even then, that he had found his Odysseus? This production may seem like uncharted terrain, a rare opportunity for the director to set his heavyweight IMAX 70-mm. cameras adrift on the high seas. (The work of the cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema is unsurprisingly stunning.) But Nolan’s “Odyssey” is less a departure than a homecoming. A three-thousand-year-old pillar of the Western canon turns out to be something of an urtext for the filmmaker’s career.

在那部太空史诗的后期,马特·达蒙曾短暂出现,饰演一位迷途的宇航员,他归家心切,以至于背叛了同伴。诺兰那时是否就已隐约感到,他找到了自己的奥德修斯?这部作品看似一片未知领域,是导演难得的机会,让他那笨重的IMAX 70毫米摄影机在公海上漂流。(摄影师霍伊特·范·霍伊特玛的作品,其惊艳程度毫不令人意外。)但诺兰的《奥德赛》与其说是一次背离,不如说是一次归乡。这部西方经典中屹立三千年的支柱,结果成了这位电影人职业生涯的某种原始文本。

There are times when you can sense Nolan’s frustration—not with Homer so much as his own inability to reshape the material into something more than mere spectacle. When Odysseus and his men navigate a course between the stonelike, man-grabbing tentacles of Scylla and the enormous churning maelstrom of Charybdis—or, as they are known in less orthodox translations, Rocky and Poolwrinkle—Nolan seems even more impatient to press on than the men are. And when Telemachus pays a crucial visit to the Spartan king Menelaus (Jon Bernthal) and his faithless queen, Helen of Troy (a fiercely defiant Lupita Nyong’o)—in a sequence that also recaps the grim postwar fate of the Greek conqueror Agamemnon (an unrecognizably helmeted Benny Safdie)—you sense plot points being jammed capably, if perfunctorily, into position.

有些时候,你能感觉到诺兰的挫败感——与其说是对荷马,不如说是对自己无法将素材重塑为超越单纯奇观的东西感到无力。当奥德修斯和他的手下在斯库拉那如石头般抓人的触手和卡律布狄斯那巨大翻腾的大漩涡之间航行时——或者用不那么正统的译名,岩礁怪和漩涡怪——诺兰似乎比他的手下更急于前行。而当忒勒玛科斯对斯巴达国王墨涅拉俄斯(乔·博恩瑟 饰)及其不忠的王后、特洛伊的海伦(露皮塔·尼永奥 饰,展现出一种强烈反抗的姿态)进行关键拜访时——这段情节也概述了希腊征服者阿伽门农(戴着头盔、无法辨认的本·萨弗迪 饰)战后的悲惨命运——你能感觉到情节点被熟练地、却也敷衍地塞进了位置。

Mythology can be unyielding, and apart from one bold borrowing from Virgil’s telling of the Trojan-horse story—Sinon (Elliot Page), a warrior who appears in the Aeneid but not in the Odyssey—Nolan is compelled to follow the natural flow of Homer’s narrative events. It’s in the realm of language and theme that he finds the creative liberation he seeks. He has simplified and deformalized much of Homer’s poetry, and, in a shrewd decision, he has encouraged his actors to speak in a contemporary register, in more or less their native accents. Damon doesn’t go full Bostonian, but he gives us the most plainspoken American of epic heroes, down to the occasional F-bomb. His old-fashioned movie-star charisma has a bracing cut-the-crap terseness. When Odysseus outwits Polyphemus, the Cyclops—a towering puppet, brought to life by the actor Bill Irwin—he does so in near-total silence; gone is the character’s floridly articulated ruse to get his one-eyed captor drunk. Damon can be as crisp an orator as any actor now working, but his performance here reminds you why Jason Bourne, moving stealthily through a crowd like a sheathed dagger, remains one of his defining roles. There is something about a more taciturn Odysseus that suits Damon’s no-nonsense affect, his contained gravity. It feels right that, when he adds insult to the Cyclops’ injury, his taunt takes the form of an arrow.

神话可以是难以驾驭的,除了从维吉尔对特洛伊木马故事的叙述中大胆借用了一点——西农(艾略特·佩吉 饰),一位出现在《埃涅阿斯纪》而非《奥德赛》中的战士——诺兰被迫遵循荷马叙事事件的自然流程。正是在语言和主题的领域,他找到了他所寻求的创作自由。他简化了荷马的许多诗句,并使其不那么正式,而且,他做出了一个精明的决定,鼓励演员用当代语域说话,或多或少保留他们自己的口音。达蒙没有完全用波士顿口音,但他呈现了史诗英雄中最直言不讳的美国式表达,甚至偶尔会爆粗口。他那种老派电影明星的魅力,带有一种令人警醒的、少说废话的简洁。当奥德修斯智胜独眼巨人波吕斐摩斯——一个由演员比尔·欧文赋予生命的高大木偶——时,他几乎是在完全的沉默中做到的;原著中角色为灌醉独眼捕获者而精心编造的计谋不见了。达蒙可以是当今影坛最干脆利落的演说家,但他在这里的表演提醒你,为什么杰森·伯恩——像一柄入鞘的匕首般悄无声息地穿过人群——仍然是他最具代表性的角色之一。一个更沉默寡言的奥德修斯,恰好契合了达蒙那种不苟言笑的气质和他内敛的庄重感。当他给独眼巨人雪上加霜时,他的嘲弄以一支箭的形式出现,这感觉很对味。

Nolan doesn’t exactly share his hero’s reticence; one of his signature tactics as a writer is to place blocky, boldface ideas in furious opposition. “Oppenheimer” (2023), his despairing drama about the origins of atomic warfare, was about the chasm between theory and practice—an academic genius’s inability to confront the darkest applications of his brilliance. “The Prestige” (2006), a tale of rival professional conjurers from the late nineteenth century—talk about a time of apparent magic!—pitted the rigors of art against the compromises of commerce. Like those films, “The Odyssey” unfolds amid momentous social and technological upheaval: the Trojan War has ushered in a brutal new era of human domination, and the gods themselves have retreated in disgust from mortal affairs. The ideological conflict here is between Zeus’ law, which insists on compassion, and the rules of combat, which increasingly demand that every rule be broken.

诺兰并不完全认同他笔下英雄的缄默;作为编剧,他标志性的策略之一,就是将块状、粗体的理念置于激烈的对立之中。《奥本海默》(2023),他那部关于原子战起源的绝望戏剧,讲的是理论与实践之间的鸿沟——一个学术天才无法面对自己才华最黑暗的应用。《致命魔术》(2006),一个关于19世纪末互为对手的职业魔术师的故事——那才真叫一个看似存在魔法的时代!——将艺术的严谨与商业的妥协相对抗。如同那些电影,《奥德赛》也是在重大的社会和技术动荡中展开的:特洛伊战争开启了一个人类统治的残酷新时代,众神本身也因厌恶凡间事务而退却。这里的意识形态冲突,在于坚持同情心的宙斯律法,与日益要求打破所有规则的战争法则之间。

The secularism of Nolan’s film thus carries a genuine moral logic. We encounter just one Olympian deity, Athena (Zendaya), who pops up from time to time to offer Odysseus her counsel, and even she might well be a mere projection of our hero’s addled mind—like one of the extras in Nolan’s dreamworld fantasia, “Inception” (2010). Poseidon, the angry lord of the sea, is visible only through his handiwork, the great sloshing storms that nearly capsize Odysseus’ red-masted ships. Zeus himself is entirely absent, which is why the repeated invocations of his law feel so resonant: in a world of overwhelming human savagery, a simple gesture of kindness becomes a profound act of faith, reasserting a covenant between men and the gods who might still walk among them.

因此,诺兰电影的世俗主义带有一种真正的道德逻辑。我们只遇到一位奥林匹斯神祇,雅典娜(赞达亚 饰),她不时出现,为奥德修斯提供忠告,而即使是她,也很可能只是我们英雄混乱心智的投射——就像诺兰的梦境狂想曲《盗梦空间》(2010)中的某个额外角色。愤怒的海神波塞冬,只能通过他的杰作——那些几乎掀翻奥德修斯红桅船的滔天风暴——才得以显现。宙斯本人则完全缺席,正因如此,对他律法的反复提及才显得如此意味深长:在一个充斥着人类极端暴行的世界里,一个简单的善举,就成了一种深刻的信仰行为,重申了人类与可能仍行走在他们中间的神祇之间的盟约。

It’s no accident that the most powerfully imagined set pieces in “The Odyssey” are all predicated on violations of Zeus’ law. Circe’s swine-and-dine trick is one. Polyphemus’ violent inhospitality is another. Then, in the film’s most shattering moment, Odysseus realizes that no one has dishonored Zeus’ law with more world-altering consequences than he and his men did at Troy—a mass tragedy that, as presented here, is morally analogous to the horrors that J. Robert Oppenheimer’s invention unleashed on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nolan divides the sacking of Troy into two lengthy sequences, both shot under cover of darkness but edited (by Jennifer Lame) with a magisterial clarity. The first sequence plays out with breathtaking suspense, the second with wrenching tragedy; the difference is calibrated by the composer Ludwig Göransson, whose score pulses with mournful dissonance and martial fury. Violent mayhem hasn’t always been Nolan’s choreographic strong suit, but in “The Odyssey” he finds the propulsive rhythm of big-screen action. Blood spurts and weapons clash as they never have before in his films, and the impact of every loosed arrow registers with sickening force. Would Homer have admired the result? It’s hard to say, though I suspect that, here and there, Kurosawa might have.

《奥德赛》中最具想象力、最有力的场景,无一例外都建立在违反宙斯律法的基础上,这绝非偶然。喀耳刻的“先吃后变猪”把戏是一例。波吕斐摩斯暴力的不好客是另一例。然后,在影片最令人心碎的时刻,奥德修斯意识到,没有人比他和他的手下在特洛伊所做的,更严重地玷污了宙斯的律法,并带来了改变世界的后果——正如本片所呈现的,这场大规模悲剧在道德上,堪比J·罗伯特·奥本海默的发明在广岛和长崎释放的恐怖。诺兰将特洛伊的洗劫分成两个长段落,都在夜色掩护下拍摄,但剪辑(詹妮弗·拉梅 负责)却有着一种权威般的清晰。第一段以令人窒息的悬念展开,第二段则是令人心碎的悲剧;两者间的差异由作曲家路德维希·戈兰松校准,他的配乐脉动着哀伤的不和谐音与战争的狂暴。暴力混战并非一直是诺兰在动作编排上的强项,但在《奥德赛》中,他找到了大银幕动作戏的推进节奏。鲜血喷溅,兵器交锋,其冲击力在他以往的电影中前所未有,每一支离弦之箭都带着令人难受的力量。荷马会赞赏这个结果吗?很难说,不过我猜想,在某些地方,黑泽明可能会。

All of which is to say that the Odyssey, in depriving Nolan of opportunities for his ingenuity as a screenwriter, has also pushed him toward greater filmmaking risks. He evinces a more intuitive command of the medium and, at times, an uncanny sense of restraint. When Odysseus hears the Sirens’ deadly song, he does not urge his men to untie him from the mast, as the text declares; he simply breaks down sobbing, as if the lyrical force of the music had reminded him of every piercing regret and every errant desire that had ever afflicted him. And then there is Odysseus’ climactic return to Ithaca—a long-overdue family reunion and political reckoning that unfolds with classical directness and simplicity, featuring passages of great emotional tension and moments of silent, miraculous recognition. Tom Holland comes across as a vulnerable princeling without being petulant or drippy. And Anne Hathaway, in a bravura performance, situates Penelope on an emotional precipice, caught between indecision and indignation, between yearning for her husband and a palpable disgust with the alternatives.

这一切都说明,《奥德赛》在剥夺了诺兰施展其编剧巧思的机会的同时,也推动他冒了更大的电影制作风险。他展现出对媒介更直觉的掌控,有时甚至是一种不可思议的克制感。当奥德修斯听到塞壬致命的歌声时,他并没有像原文那样,催促手下把他从桅杆上解开;他只是崩溃地哭泣,仿佛那音乐抒情的魔力,让他想起了曾折磨过他的每一个尖锐的悔恨和每一次越轨的欲望。然后是奥德修斯高潮性的返回伊萨卡——一场姗姗来迟的家庭团聚和政治清算,以古典的直接和简洁展开,其中既有情感张力巨大的段落,也有沉默、奇迹般的相认时刻。汤姆·赫兰德演出了一个脆弱的年轻王子,既不任性也不矫情。而安妮·海瑟薇,以一次精彩的表演,将佩涅洛佩置于情感的悬崖边,夹在犹豫不决与愤慨之间,夹在对丈夫的渴望与对替代者们明显的厌恶之间。

Like Damon, Hathaway has now appeared in three Nolan movies (the two briefly shared screen time in “Interstellar”), and here she embodies a welcome rarity in his œuvre. Nolan’s work has long betrayed a morbid preoccupation with deceased female partners; in films including “Memento,” “The Prestige,” “Inception,” and “The Dark Knight,” the dead wife or girlfriend becomes a supreme motivator toward vengeance, an angrily defining obsession. Homer has steered him right. Penelope is no femme fatale from beyond the grave; she’s a living, breathing, genuinely regal woman, and the pull that she exerts on her husband’s memories is one of unambiguous benevolence, grace, and love. Nolan is by now as close to a Zeus figure as exists in Hollywood cinema, and “The Odyssey” is his latest lightning bolt, hurled from an Olympian perch of critical and commercial supremacy. It’s also proof that he should violate his own laws more often. ♦

和达蒙一样,海瑟薇如今也已出演了三部诺兰的电影(两人曾在《星际穿越》中短暂同框),在这里,她体现了诺兰作品中一个受欢迎的稀有存在。诺兰的作品长期以来流露出对已故女性伴侣的病态迷恋;在包括《记忆碎片》、《致命魔术》、《盗梦空间》和《黑暗骑士》在内的影片中,死去的妻子或女友成了复仇的终极动机,一种定义性的、愤怒的执念。荷马将他引向了正途。佩涅洛佩不是来自坟墓彼岸的蛇蝎美人;她是一个活生生的、呼吸着的、真正庄严的女人,她对丈夫记忆施加的吸引力,是明确无误的仁慈、优雅与爱。诺兰如今在好莱坞电影界,已近乎宙斯般的存在,而《奥德赛》则是他从奥林匹斯山般的评论与商业统治地位上,投下的最新一道闪电。它同样证明,他应该更经常地打破自己的法则。 ♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month