The Current Cinema

“Amrum” Offers a Child’s-Eye View of Fascism in Retreat

《安鲁姆岛》:一个孩子眼中的法西斯溃败
In Fatih Akin’s coming-of-age drama, a twelve-year-old German islander witnesses the end of the Second World War from a perilous, momentous remove.
在法提赫·阿金这部成长题材的戏剧中,一名十二岁的德国岛民从险峻而关键的距离,目睹了第二次世界大战的终结。
April 18, 2026
A young figure walks through a body of water with a bike.
Video courtesy Kino Lorber

There’s a bracing image partway through “Amrum,” a new historical drama from the director Fatih Akin, that has the makings of an antifascist meme. It’s the spring of 1945, and word of the Second World War’s impending end has reached the residents of Amrum, an island off the coast of Germany. The general response to this news seems muted; apart from an outspoken potato farmer (Diane Kruger) who looks forward to the conclusion of “Hitler’s damn war,” the islanders know that their rage against the Nazi regime is, like an illegal radio or extra rations, something best kept to themselves. Hille Hagener (Laura Tonke), a Third Reich true believer, is shattered by grief; cradling her newborn baby, she murmurs, “What kind of a world is this for a child to grow up in?” Her tough-minded sister, Ena (Lisa Hagmeister), sees things with greater clarity. She pulls a photograph of Hitler out of its frame and—here’s the meme-able moment—quietly burns it on the kitchen stove, as if to mark the end of an era and, perhaps, of a collective delusion. Whatever uncertainty the future may bring, Ena knows that the only way forward is forward.

在法提赫·阿金(Fatih Akin)执导的新历史剧《安鲁姆岛》中段,有一幅令人警醒的画面,堪称反法西斯迷因的绝佳素材。时值1945年春天,第二次世界大战即将结束的消息传到了这座德国沿海岛屿。岛民们对此反应平淡——除了那位直言不讳的土豆农妇(黛安·克鲁格饰)期待着"希特勒那该死的战争"终结,其他人都明白,对纳粹政权的愤恨如同私藏收音机或超额配给粮,最好深埋心底。第三帝国的忠实信徒希勒·哈格纳(劳拉·汤克饰)悲痛欲绝,她抱着新生婴儿喃喃道:"这算什么让孩子成长的世界?"而她意志坚韧的妹妹埃娜(丽莎·哈格迈斯特饰)却看得更透彻。她从相框里抽出希特勒的照片——正是这个迷因感十足的时刻——在厨房炉灶上静静点燃,仿佛在标记一个时代的终结,或许也是一种集体幻灭的终结。无论未来充满多少不确定,埃娜深知:唯有向前,才是出路。

We watch the immolation of Hitler’s likeness and feel warmed, even hopeful. But Nanning (Jasper Billerbeck), the eldest of Hille’s four children, looks on with wide-eyed curiosity and a measure of confusion. He’s the movie’s protagonist; he’s also an angelic-looking young stand-in for the German filmmaker, actor, and novelist Hark Bohm, who died in November, at the age of eighty-six. (Akin and Bohm, who were longtime friends, are credited as co-writers; Bohm was originally planning to direct, but eventually asked Akin to take over.) “Amrum” is a fictionalized memoir of a wartime childhood, in which the remoteness of island life is shown to breed its own specific sufferings and bestow its own strange lessons. The conflict may be at something of a geographic remove—the transfixing sight of warplanes soaring over the beach, or of an airman’s corpse washed up by the tide, comes as a jolting reminder of a distant yet ever-present horror—but its psychological effects prove no easier to shake, especially for an impressionable child.

我们看着希特勒的肖像被焚毁,感到温暖,甚至充满希望。但希勒四个孩子中最年长的南宁(贾斯珀·比勒贝克饰)却睁大眼睛,带着好奇与些许困惑注视着这一切。他是这部电影的主角,也是德国电影人、演员兼小说家哈克·博姆的替身——这位去年十一月以八十六岁高龄辞世的艺术家,在片中化身为天使般面容的少年。(阿克与博姆是多年挚友,两人共同署名编剧;博姆原计划亲自执导,最终却邀请阿克接手。)《安鲁姆岛》是一部战时童年记忆的虚构化回忆录,孤岛生活的隔绝滋生出独特的苦难,也赋予其诡异的启示。战争或许在地理上保持着某种距离——战机掠过海滩的慑人景象,或是被潮水冲上海岸的飞行员遗体,都如惊雷般提醒着遥远却无处不在的恐怖——但其心理影响却同样难以摆脱,对一个易受感动的孩子而言尤其如此。

Put more bluntly, the film is a Nazi coming-of-age story and a drama of deliverance, in which Nanning, a twelve-year-old member of the Jungvolk (basically, a kinder-Hitler Youth), takes his crucial first steps toward throwing off the ideological shackles. They’re not easily cast aside. Nanning’s father, a Nazi officer, is off fighting in the war; his mother, who gives birth the same day that Hitler’s death is announced, sinks into a depression that seems more post-Führer than postpartum. When an exhausted Hille declares “All I want is white bread with butter and honey”—former staples that have now become unobtainable luxuries—Nanning, a good, obedient son, sets out to make his mother’s dream come true. Soon, we are caught up in a boy’s grand adventure, though one that is grounded by a keen understanding of wartime scarcities. Preparing his mother’s meal of choice will require him to barter and negotiate with a baker (Marek Harloff), a beekeeper (Jorid Lukaczik), and a fishmonger, Arjan (Lars Jessen), whose brand of smoked flatfish has become an island currency in itself.

更直白地说,这是一部纳粹少年的成长故事,也是一场精神解脱的戏剧。十二岁的南宁是少年团(Jungvolk,相当于低龄版希特勒青年团)成员,他迈出了挣脱意识形态枷锁的关键第一步。这些枷锁并不容易摆脱。南宁的父亲是纳粹军官,正在前线作战;母亲在希特勒死讯公布当天分娩,随后陷入抑郁——那更像是元首死后的虚空,而非产后忧郁。当疲惫的希勒说出"我只想要涂了黄油和蜂蜜的白面包"时(这些曾经的日常食物如今已成奢望),孝顺的南宁决心实现母亲的愿望。很快,我们被卷入这个男孩的宏大冒险,但故事始终扎根于对战时物资匮乏的敏锐洞察。要为母亲准备这顿梦想餐点,他必须与面包师(马雷克·哈洛夫饰)、养蜂人(约里德·卢卡奇克饰)以及鱼贩阿尔扬(拉斯·杰森饰)进行交易谈判——阿尔扬特制的熏比目鱼已成为岛上的硬通货。

Arjan, a grizzled fellow with mirthful eyes, is one of many locals who quietly expand Nanning’s horizons. The old man once went to New York to make his fortune; so did Nanning’s grandfather and other Amrumers, a revelation that sheds new light on the pride, insularity, and xenophobia of this community, where even German mainlanders are regarded, contemptuously, as outsiders. Nanning, who was born in Hamburg, is bullied by a schoolmate who tells him that he’s no more a native Amrumer than the Polish refugees who have recently arrived on the island. Hille tries to reassure Nanning, noting that they are dwelling in their ancestral home: “Through me, your Amrumer blood goes back nine generations.” Tonke, in a haunting performance, gives these words an unmistakably fanatical chill. Hille’s every thought, word, and deed is governed by an obsession with blood purity. Clinging to her sense of racial and cultural superiority with an ever more unyielding grip, she seems utterly beyond saving. Her children, mercifully, are another story.

阿扬(Arjan)是个头发花白、眼神快活的男人,和许多当地人一样,他不动声色地拓展着南宁(Nanning)的眼界。这位老人曾去纽约闯荡;南宁的祖父和其他阿姆鲁姆岛民也是如此——这个发现为这个社区的骄傲、封闭和排外心理提供了新的注脚,在这里,就连德国本土人都被轻蔑地视为外来者。在汉堡出生的南宁遭到同学欺负,对方说他跟最近来到岛上的波兰难民一样,都不是真正的阿姆鲁姆人。希勒(Hille)试图安慰南宁,指出他们正住在祖辈的房子里:"通过我,你的阿姆鲁姆血统可以追溯到九代之前。"托恩克(Tonke)以令人难忘的表演,赋予这些台词一种无可置疑的狂热寒意。希勒的每一个念头、每一句话、每一个行为,都受到对血统纯正的执念支配。她越来越顽固地坚守着种族和文化优越感,似乎已彻底无可救药。所幸,她的孩子们是另一回事。

Fraught questions of national identity and dislocation have long weighed on Akin, who was born to Turkish-immigrant parents in Hamburg, and who charted the difficult journeys of German Turkish protagonists in his two major international breakthroughs, “Head-On” (2005) and “The Edge of Heaven” (2008). Since then, Akin’s restless streak has sent him all over the map—geographically, dramatically, and stylistically—and although he seldom seems disengaged, he has struggled to retain, or regain, the bristling urgency and jagged formalism that gave his early work its undeniable vitality. He confronted the Armenian genocide in “The Cut” (2014); went after neo-Nazi terrorists in the revenge thriller “In the Fade” (2017); and, most inexplicably, chronicled the life and crimes of a notorious Hamburg serial killer in “The Golden Glove” (2019), a little-seen abomination. My personal favorite of Akin’s films might be one of his most lighthearted: the shambling foodie comedy “Soul Kitchen” (2010), whose culinary concerns give it the slenderest of links to “Amrum” and its bread-and-honey mission impossible.

关于民族认同与流离失所的沉重命题,长久以来萦绕在法提赫·阿金(Fatih Akin)心头。这位出生于汉堡的土耳其移民后代,曾凭借《勇往直前》(2005)与《在人生的另一边》(2008)两部国际突破之作,勾勒出德国土耳其裔主人公的艰难旅程。此后,阿金不安分的创作轨迹在地域、戏剧性与风格层面不断延展——尽管他鲜少流露出疏离感,却始终难以维系或重拾早期作品中那种锋芒毕露的紧迫感与棱角分明的形式主义,而这正是其早期作品不可否认的生命力所在。他在《割腕者》(2014)中直面亚美尼亚大屠杀;在复仇惊悚片《凭空而来》(2017)里追击新纳粹恐怖分子;最令人费解的是,他还在鲜有人问津的骇俗之作《金手套》(2019)中,记录了一位臭名昭著的汉堡连环杀手的生平与罪行。在我个人偏爱的阿金作品中,或许要数他最轻松愉快的《心灵厨房》(2010)——这部散漫的美食喜剧片对烹饪的专注,使其与《安鲁姆岛》及其"面包与蜂蜜"的终极任务之间,维系着最微弱的关联。

The new film is both Akin’s strongest and, with its stately, picturesque classicism, his least characteristic work in some time. “Amrum” almost acknowledges as much; it comes billed as “A Hark Bohm Film by Fatih Akin,” an unwieldy yet moving onscreen declaration of joint authorship. But, by dint of its story and its subject, the movie also feels like part of a broader cinematic conversation. It can’t help but conjure the vast range of films that have shown us the horrors of war from a kid’s perspective—a field that has yielded a few masterpieces, including Andrei Tarkovsky’s “Ivan’s Childhood” (1963) and Elem Klimov’s “Come and See” (1985), and, more recently, an underappreciated future classic, Steve McQueen’s “Blitz” (2024). Curiously, and through no fault of Akin’s or Bohm’s, the children-at-war picture that “Amrum” most resembles on its face is Taika Waititi’s “Jojo Rabbit” (2019), the rare film to which I’d admit a grudging, gun-to-my-head preference for even “The Golden Glove.”

这部新片既是阿金迄今为止最有力的作品,也因其庄重、如画的古典风格,成为他近年来最不具个人特色的作品。《安鲁姆》几乎承认了这一点;影片的宣传语是"法提赫·阿金执导的哈克·博姆电影",这句略显笨拙却动人的银幕宣言宣告了作品的共同作者身份。但凭借其故事与主题,这部电影也像是一场更广阔电影对话的组成部分。它不可避免地让人联想到那些从儿童视角展现战争恐怖的大量影片——这个领域曾诞生过若干杰作,包括安德烈·塔可夫斯基的《伊万的童年》(1963年)和依莱姆·克里莫夫的《自己去看》(1985年),以及近年一部被低估的未来经典:史蒂夫·麦奎因的《闪电战》(2024年)。耐人寻味的是,尽管并非阿金或博姆的过错,《安鲁姆》表面上最接近的战争儿童题材电影,竟是塔伊加·维迪提的《乔乔的异想世界》(2019年)——这是极少数让我不得不承认,即便拿枪指着脑袋,可能也会选择它而非《金手套》的影片。

Like “Jojo Rabbit,” “Amrum” tracks a young Nazi boy’s reverse indoctrination and moral awakening during the last gasp of the Second World War. (Both films also feature scenes of bunny slaughter, clearly a popular rite of passage for that demographic.) Unlike “Jojo Rabbit,” “Amrum” does not infantilize the audience, trivialize the Holocaust, abuse the music of David Bowie, turn Hitler into a grotesque imaginary-friend caricature, or shy away from the idea that Nazis might, in fact, be terrible people. The two films’ most relevant point of connection might concern their pint-size protagonists, both of whom appear to have been cast for maximal cherubic appeal, as if to short-circuit any qualms we might have about embracing a Hitler Youth in training. Billerbeck, a first-time actor and a superb discovery, is such an immediately likable screen presence that it’s only natural to wonder if you’re being worked over.

与《乔乔兔》相似,《安鲁姆岛》也讲述了一名纳粹少年在二战尾声经历思想改造与道德觉醒的故事。(两部影片都有屠杀兔子的场景,显然这是该年龄段男孩的某种成人礼。)但与《乔乔兔》不同,《安鲁姆岛》没有将观众幼稚化,没有淡化大屠杀的残酷,没有滥用大卫·鲍伊的音乐,没有把希特勒扭曲成怪诞的幻想朋友式漫画形象,更没有回避纳粹本质上就是恶徒的事实。两部影片最关键的共通点或许在于它们的小主人公——两位小演员都被选角导演赋予了天使般的极致魅力,仿佛要以此消解观众对拥抱一个正在受训的希特勒青年团员可能产生的犹疑。首次出演电影的比尔贝克是个绝佳的发现,他在银幕上有着令人瞬间倾心的感染力,让人不禁怀疑自己是否正被某种表演技巧所操控。

Worry not. Nanning is an engaging lead, but he isn’t sentimentalized. He is, like many children, susceptible to the pressures of obedience and groupthink—qualities that can be weaponized under totalitarian circumstances—but he also has sufficient clarity to be horrified when he learns how antisemitism has shaped his own family. His character is, in a way, as malleable and half-formed as the white coasts of Amrum: invitingly sandy beaches that can turn instantly harrowing when the tide rolls in. More than once, Nanning, carrying a precious portion of butter or sugar, must wander into that treacherous tide. In one instance, he’s forced to make a swift, momentous decision about the value of another human life.

不必担心。南宁这个主角虽然引人入胜,却并未被塑造成多愁善感的形象。和许多孩子一样,他容易屈从于服从的压力和群体思维——这些特质在极权环境下可能被武器化——但当他得知反犹主义如何塑造了自己的家族史时,仍保持着足以感到惊骇的清醒。某种意义上,他的性格就像阿姆鲁姆岛那片白色海岸般可塑而未定型:看似诱人的沙滩会在潮水涌来时瞬间变得险恶。南宁不止一次怀揣着珍贵的黄油或糖块,被迫踏入那片诡谲的潮水中。其中一次,他必须就他人生命的价值做出迅速而重大的抉择。

He chooses wisely, and you sense, by the movie’s end, that he’ll keep doing so. “Amrum” ends on a freeze-frame closeup of Nanning’s face, a visual gesture that immediately invokes one of the greatest of semi-autobiographical dramas, François Truffaut’s “The 400 Blows” (1959). But, unlike Antoine Doinel, that film’s troubled young hero, Nanning is smiling. He has not broken with his mother, as Antoine does, but he has come to a healthy understanding of her and her limitations. He is, no less than Antoine, a product of a failed system—and “Amrum,” without spelling out how, leaves us with little doubt that he will outlive it. ♦

他的选择明智,而到影片结尾时,你能感觉到他会继续这样做。《安鲁姆》以宁宁(Nanning)面部的定格特写收尾,这一视觉手法立刻让人联想到最伟大的半自传体电影之一——弗朗索瓦·特吕弗的《四百击》(1959)。但与那部电影中饱受困扰的年轻主角安托万·杜瓦内尔不同,宁宁在微笑。他没有像安托万那样与母亲决裂,而是对她及其局限达成了健康的理解。和安托万一样,他也是失败体制的产物——而《安鲁姆》虽未明言,却让我们毫不怀疑他将活得比这体制更长久。♦

2 free previews left — register to get 30 translations a month